Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society

83 Taxmann.com 140High Court2017#256 most cited

What is Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society authority for?

Interest income earned by a co-operative society from deposits or investments made in a co-operative bank is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in view of Section 80P(4).

306

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society · 83 Taxmann.com 140 · Section 80P(2)(d) · Section 80P(4) · co-operative society interest deduction · interest from co-operative bank · deduction disallowance 80P · Totagars Karnataka High Court · investment income co-operative society

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, Hadapsar Pune vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 14 (1) Pune, Pune

Appeals of the assessee are ALLOWED

ITA 1046/PUN/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Partha Sarathi Choudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 1045 & 1046/Pun/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2018-19 & 2020-21 Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Sr No. 14, Satyaraj Complex, Hadapsar, Pune-411028 Pan: Aaaak3735D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Shingte [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Gaurav Singh [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…॥ आयकर अपीलीय न्यायाधिकरण, पुणे ‘एस.एम.स .’ न्यायपीठ, पुणे में ॥ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNE ‘SMC’ BENCH, PUNE BEFORE HON’BLE PARTHA SARATHI CHOUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपऩल सं. / ITA No. 1045 & 1046/PUN/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2018-19 & 2020-21 Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Sr No. 14, Satyaraj Complex, Hadapsar, Pune-411028 PAN: AAAAK3735D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/s Income Tax Officer, Ward-14(1), Pune . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वधरध / Appearances Assessee by : Mr Pramo…

Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, Hadapsar Pune vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward 14 (1) Pune, Pune

Appeals of the assessee are ALLOWED

ITA 1045/PUN/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Pune21 Feb 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Partha Sarathi Choudhury & Shri G. D. Padmahshaliआयकर अपऩल सं. / Ita No. 1045 & 1046/Pun/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2018-19 & 2020-21 Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Sr No. 14, Satyaraj Complex, Hadapsar, Pune-411028 Pan: Aaaak3735D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant

For Appellant: Mr Pramod Shingte [‘Ld. AR’]For Respondent: Mr Gaurav Singh [‘Ld. DR’]
Section 143(3)Section 250Section 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…॥ आयकर अपीलीय न्यायाधिकरण, पुणे ‘एस.एम.स .’ न्यायपीठ, पुणे में ॥ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PUNE ‘SMC’ BENCH, PUNE BEFORE HON’BLE PARTHA SARATHI CHOUDHURY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. D. PADMAHSHALI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपऩल सं. / ITA No. 1045 & 1046/PUN/2023 निर्धारण वषा / Assessment Year : 2018-19 & 2020-21 Karmaveer Bhaurao Patil Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit Sr No. 14, Satyaraj Complex, Hadapsar, Pune-411028 PAN: AAAAK3735D . . . . . . . अपीलार्थी / Appellant बिधम / V/s Income Tax Officer, Ward-14(1), Pune . . . . . . . प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent द्वधरध / Appearances Assessee by : Mr Pramo…

Vittal Grameena Sahakari Bank Niyamitha, Vittal vs. Income-Tax Officer, Ward-2(5), Mangaluru

ITA 895/BANG/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore06 Feb 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Chandra Poojariassessment Year: 2017-18 Vittal Grameena Sahakari Bank Niyamitha F.F. 94, Palace Road Vittal Bantwal Taluk Ito Vs. Vittal 574 222 Ward-2(5) Karnataka Mangaluru Pan No.Aaava1252A Assessee Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Harsha J., A.R. Revenue By : Shri Parithivel, D.R. Date Of Hearing : 06.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement : 06.02.2024 O R D E R Per Chandra Poojari: This Appeal By Assessee Is Directed Against Order Of Nfac For The Assessment Year 2017-18 Dated 12.9.2023 Passed U/S 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “The Act”). The Assessee Has Raised Following Grounds Of Appeal: 1. “The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Passed Under Section 250 Of The Act Is Opposed To Law, Equity, Weight Of Evidence, Probabilities & The Facts & Circumstances In The Appellant'S Case. 2. The Appellant Denies To Be Assessed To Tax On Total Income As Determined By The Learr.Ad Ao Of Rs. 2,52,38,729/- As Against The Total Income Reported By The Appellant Of Rs. Nil On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case.

For Appellant: Ms. Harsha J., A.RFor Respondent: Shri Parithivel, D.R
Section 250Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)Section 80P(4)

…es of the case. 3. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) erred in applying the ratio of judgment of Karnataka High Court in the case of M/s/Totgars Co-operative Sales Society reported Vittal Grameena Sahakari Bank Niyamitha, Vittal Page 2 of 22 in 83 Taxmann.com 140 for charging interest income as "IFOS" which are distinguishable on facts of the Appellant case: a. the Appellant is a credit co-operative society and not engaged in marketing of agricultural produce; and b. the Appellant has earned interest from investment of its operational funds used in business of investing and lending to members and n…

Jafari Momin Vikas Co-Op. Credit Society Ltd., Patan vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-4 Present Ward-1, Patan

Appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 279/AHD/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Ms. Suchitra R. Kambleassessment Year: 2018-19 Jafari Momin Vikas Co-Op. Credit Vs Income Tax Officer, Society Limited, Ward-4 At & Post Kakoshi, Tal. Siddhpur, Dist. (Present Ward-1), Patan, Kakoshi, Gujarat Patan Pan : Aaaaj 1053 F अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Hasmukh V. Doshi & Shri Mehal H. Doshi, Ars Revenue By : Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08/01/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 19/01/2024

For Appellant: Shri Hasmukh V. Doshi &For Respondent: Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr DR
Section 250Section 40A(7)Section 40A(9)Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD \ BEFORE Ms. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2018-19 Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op. Credit Vs Income Tax Officer, Society Limited, Ward-4 At & Post Kakoshi, Tal. Siddhpur, Dist. (Present Ward-1), Patan, Kakoshi, Gujarat Patan PAN : AAAAJ 1053 F अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Hasmukh V. Doshi & Shri Mehal H. Doshi, ARs Revenue by : Shri Purushottam Kumar, Sr DR सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 08/01/2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 19/01/2024 O R D E R This appeal filed by the assessee is direct…

M/S. Dodmane Group Gramagala Seva Sahakari Sangha Niyamita Karkimaki, Karkimakki vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Sirsi

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 751/BANG/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore21 Nov 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George Kassessment Year : 2018-19 Sri Dodmane Group Gramagala Seva Sahakari Vs. Ito, Sangha Niyamita Karkimakki, Ward – 1, 41, Siddapur-Kumta Road Karkimakki Sirsi. Tq 581 322, Karnataka. Pan : Aacad 0741 J Appellant Respondent Assessee By : Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, Ca Revenue By : Shri. Ganesh R Ghale, Advocate, Standing Counsel For Revenue. Date Of Hearing : 21.11.2023 Date Of Pronouncement : 21.11.2023

For Appellant: Ms. Sunaina Bhatia, CAFor Respondent: Shri. Ganesh R Ghale, Advocate, Standing Counsel for Revenue
Section 143(2)Section 234Section 250Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

…ciety 392 ITR 74. 6.1 The primary issue in this case is whether such interest income is eligible for the deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) or u/s 80P(2)(d). The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in a recent decision of PCIT Hubbali vs. Totagar Co- operative Sales Society 83 Taxmann.com 140 (Karnataka) had an occasion to examine this issue and held that where the assesse is a Cooperative society engaged in marketing of agriculture produce grown by its members and Page 4 of 9 providing credit facilities to those members and has deposited its surplus funds in Co-operative Bank, the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) and 80P(2)(a…