JAFARI MOMIN VIKAS CO-OP. CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,PATAN vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4 PRESENT WARD-1, PATAN

PDF · subscribers
ITA 279/AHD/2023Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad19 January 2024AY 2018-19Bench: Ms. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE (Judicial Member)4 pages

In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that interest income earned by a co-operative society from deposits in a co-operative bank, which is a member of the co-operative society, is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). The Tribunal distinguished the Supreme Court decisions relied upon by the Revenue.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a co-operative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned from a co-operative bank. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, treating the interest as income from other sources. The CIT(A) partly allowed the assessee's appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether interest income earned by a co-operative society from a co-operative bank is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 80P(2)(d),Section 56

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Before: Ms. SUCHITRA R. KAMBLE

For Appellant: Shri Hasmukh V. Doshi &, Shri Mehal H. Doshi, ARs
Hearing: 08/01/2024Pronounced: 19/01/2024

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter referred to as "CIT(A)" for short] dated 17.03.2023 passed under Section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act" for short] for the Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19.

2.

The solitary ground raised by the assessee in its appeal reads as under:-

“Ld. CIT(A) has erred in confirming the order of AO in not considering the claim of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of IT Act in respect of net interest income of Rs.1,86,285/- from Co. Op. banks.”

3.

The assessee is a co-operative society and filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2018-19 declaring a total income of Rs. Nil. The assessee claimed deduction of Rs.57,71,324/- u/s 80P of the Act. The assessee has earned interest income of Rs.6,71,081/- from nationalized/co-operative bank and claimed deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Act. The case of the assessee was selected for complete scrutiny on the issues of disallowance u/s 40A(9) [contribution to fund, etc.],

Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op. Credit Society Ltd Vs. ITO Assessment Years: 2018-19 Page 2 of 4 Investment/Advances/Loans, Disallowance u/s 40A(7) [Gratuity provision] and deduction from total income under Chapter VI-A. After taking cognizance of the reply of the assessee, the Assessing Officer made addition of Rs.1,86,285/- thereby disallowing the interest income earned from the co-operative bank and treated the same as income from other sources u/s 56 of the Act.

4.

Being aggrieved by the assessment order, the assessee filed appeal before the CIT(A). The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal of the assessee.

5.

The Ld. AR submitted that, in the decision of Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of CIT Vs. Sabarkantha District Co-operative Milk Producers Union Ltd. in Tax Appeal No. 473 of 2014, it has categorically mentioned that the fixed deposit with banks and interest earned thereon will come under the purview of Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The ld. AR also relied upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of the SACO Bank Staff Co-op. Credit Society Ltd. Vs. ITO (ITA No.441/Ahd/2023 order dated 03.11.2023).

6.

The ld. DR submitted that the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court which was decided in case of PCIT Vs. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society, [2017] 392 ITR 74 (Karnataka) will not be applicable in assessee’s case as the latest decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. vs. CIT (Civil Appeal Nos. 7343-7350 of 2019 dated 12.01.2021), the co-operative banks are excluded from the ambit of Section 80P of the Act. Thus, the interest income derived from deposits/investments in co-operative banks are not eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. The ld. DR further submitted that the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. ACIT, (2017) 84 taxmann.com 114 (SC), has upheld this view as well, and another decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Bangalore Club Vs. CIT, 29 taxmann.com 29, has also supported this decision. The ld. DR further submitted that the Constitution Bench of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.3327 of 2007, in the case of Commissioner of Customs (Import), Mumbai Vs. Dilip Kumar & Co. & Others, delivered on 30.07.2018,

Jafari Momin Vikas Co-op. Credit Society Ltd Vs. ITO Assessment Years: 2018-19 Page 3 of 4 has categorically held that the exemption statutes have to be interpreted strictly, and in case of ambiguity, it must be interpreted in favour of the Revenue.

7.

Heard both the parties and perused all the relevant material available on record. It is pertinent to note that the assessee is earning interest income from Mehsana District Co-op. Bank Ltd., which is a registered co-operative bank under Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act and is a member of the Co-operative Society; and the interest earned thereon comes under the purview of Section 80P(2)(d) of the Act as held by the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Sabarkantha Dist. Co-op. Milk Producers Union Ltd. (supra). Therefore, the assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act. As relates to the decisions of Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd (supra), Bangalore Club (supra) and the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society, [2017] 83 taxmann.com 140 (Karnataka), will not be applicable in the light of decision of Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of The Mavilayi Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. (supra) which clearly held that the deduction u/s 80P will exclude only co-operative banks, which are co-operative societies who must possess a licence from the RBI to do banking business. In fact, the interpretation taken by the Revenue appears to be on the wrong footing, and the co-operative banks which are the members of co-operative societies and the deposits made by the co-operative societies in such cooperative banks are eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) of the Act.

8.

In result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced in the open Court on this 19th day of January, 2024.

Similar judgments

Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.

More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)

All 2,440 judgments and leading authorities on Section 80P(2)(d) →

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →