THE MANGALOREAN GARDEN HOMES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ITO WARD 23 (3)(4), MUMBAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that similar issues have been decided in favor of the assessee by referring to decisions of the Kerala High Court and previous ITAT orders, allowing the claim for deduction of interest income.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a co-operative housing society, claimed deduction under section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act for interest income earned from co-operative banks. The Assessing Officer disallowed this claim, a decision upheld by the CIT(A), relying on a Karnataka High Court judgment.
What were the issues?
Whether the interest income earned by a co-operative housing society from co-operative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Pr. CIT v. Totagars Co-operative Sales Society306 citing83 Taxmann.com 140 · 2017 · HC
- PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd.208 citing442 ITR 141 · 2022 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D ‘ BENCH
Before: SHRI AMIT SHUKLA & SHRI GAGAN GOYAL
The aforesaid appeal has been filed by assessee against order dated 28.8.2023, passed by the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the quantum of assessment passed u/s. 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’) for Assessment Year (AY) 2016- 17. The only issue raised is regard to addition of Rs.50,16,338/-
The Mangalorean Garden Homes Co-op Hsg. Soc. Ltd.. made by the Learned Assessing Officer (Ld. AO) on account of the dis-allowance of deduction u/s. 80P(2)(d) of the Act.
The assessee is a co-operative housing society having income from Citizen Credit Cooperative Bank Ltd., Saraswat Co-operative Bank Ltd. and Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank Ltd. The Ld. AO noted that the assessee has an interest of Rs.50,16,338/- on bank fixed deposits and savings account, which was claimed as exempt u/s. 80P(2)(d) received from various co-operative societies and banks.
Accordingly, the Ld. AO relying upon the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hubballi vs. Totagars Co-operative Sale Society (2017) 83 taxmann.com 140 (Karnataka) disallowed the claim u/s. 80P(2)(d). The Learned CIT(A) too has confirmed the said addition following the same judgment of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court.
4. Before us it has been brought on record that this issue has come before the Tribunal in several cases wherein after discussing the decision of Hon’ble Karnataka High Court, claim of section 80P (2)(d) has been allowed interest received from co-operative banks of the co-operative societies. For sake of ready reference, the decision of ITAT order No. 1195/Mum/2023, dated 10.7.2023, in case of Rustomjee Aspiree Premises Co-op. Soc. Ltd., wherein the Tribunal after referring to various decisions has allowed the claim of 2
The Mangalorean Garden Homes Co-op Hsg. Soc. Ltd.. deduction. Mostly according to the decision of Hon’ble Kerala High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Percoorkada Services Company Bank Ltd. (2022) 442 ITR 141 (Kerala), the claim of deduction of interest income is allowed.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Order pronounced on 29th February, 2024
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- The Mangalorean Garden Homes Co Operative… vs ITO Ward 23(3)(4), MumbaiMumbai20 Sept 2024Allowed
Also relies on PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that interest income derived by a cooperative society from deposits with cooperative banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d). This decision followed previous rulings by coordinate benche...
- Incometax Officer, Ward 1, Udupi vs Brahmavara Vyavasaya Seva, BrahmavaraBangalore16 May 2024Allowed
Also relies on PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that the assessee is not justified in claiming deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) for interest earned on deposits with cooperative banks. This decision was based on the Karnataka High Court's ruling in P...
- Income-Tax Officer, Ward-1, Udupi vs Brahmavara Vyavayasaya Seva, BrahmavaraBangalore16 May 2024Allowed
Also relies on PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal held that interest income earned from cooperative banks is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) as cooperative banks are distinct from cooperative societies for the purpose of this section. Sec...
- Royal Indl Estate Co Op Soc Ltd, Mumbai vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax - 20(1)…Mumbai29 Feb 2024Allowed
Also relies on PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal noted that similar issues have been decided in favor of the assessee by this Tribunal, citing other ITAT and Kerala High Court decisions that allow such deductions. Therefore, the Tribunal followed these pre...
- Mumbai Kamgar Madhyawarti Grahak Sahakari… vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax - Circle…Mumbai30 Aug 2024Remanded
Also relies on PCIT v. Peroorkada Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. and 1 other authority
The Tribunal restored the issue of deduction under Section 80P(2)(c) to the Assessing Officer for fresh verification. For Section 80P(2)(d), the Tribunal held that deduction is allowable if the co-operative bank does not...
More judgments on Section 80P(2)(d)
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- S R P Jutha 13 Rajkot VI and Gr S Ma, Rajkot vs ITO WD 1(2)(1) Rajkot, RajkotITA 951/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7044/MUM/2026[2021-2022]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2021-2022
- Poonam Chambers B Wing Commercial Premises… vs Deputy Commissioner Income Tax, MumbaiITA 7043/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Suvarnakarara Co-Operative Society Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 2, KarwarITA 210/PAN/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026