PCIT v. Ankit

416 ITR 591High Court2019#823 most cited

What is PCIT v. Ankit authority for?

Capital receipts, including interest subsidy received under schemes like TUF, are excluded when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. This principle also extends to the reduction of provisions written back from book profits for MAT purposes.

125

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,418 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2025.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Ankit Metal & Power Ltd. · Ankit · Section 115JB · book profits · Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) · exclusion from book profits · capital receipts · interest subsidy · TUF scheme · provisions written back · Section 2(24)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Ankit

M/S. Fdc Limited, Mumbai vs. Addll. CIT- 8 (1), Mumbai

Appeal stand dismissed

ITA 6901/MUM/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai08 Oct 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am (Hearing Through Video Conferencing Mode) 1. आयकरअपील िं./ I.T.A. No.6901/Mum/2018 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) & 2. आयकरअपील िं./ I.T.A. No.6840/Mum/2018 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2011-12) M/S Fdc Limited Acit Circle– 8(1) बिाम/ 142-48, S. V. Road {Now Acit Circle 9(3)(1)} Jogeshwari (West) R. No. 215, Aayakar Bhavan Vs. Mumbai – 400 102 Mumbai-400 020 स्थायीलेखा िं./ जीआइआर िं./ Pan/Gir No. Aaacf-0253-H (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : & 3. आयकरअपील िं./ I.T.A. No.7016/Mum/2018 (धििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Acit Circle– 8(1) M/S Fdc Limited बिाम/ {Now Acit Circle 9(3)(1)} 142-48, S. V. Road R. No. 215, Aayakar Bhavan Jogeshwari (West) Vs. Mumbai-400 020 Mumbai – 400 102 स्थायीलेखा िं./ जीआइआर िं./ Pan/Gir No. Aaacf-0253-H (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : Assessee By : Shri S. S. Nagar, Ld. Ar Revenue By : Shri Sunil Deshpande, Ld. Cit-Dr ुनवाई की तारीख/ : 20/07/2021 Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / : 08/10/2021 Date Of Pronouncement

For Appellant: Shri S. S. Nagar, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Deshpande, Ld. CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 92C

…Income Tax Act nor can be included in the Profit & Loss account prepared under Part-II and Part-III of Schedule-VI of the Companies Act, reliance has been placed on the decision of Hon’ble High Court of Calcutta in Pr.CIT V/s Ankit Metal and Power Ltd. (2019; 416 ITR 591) and the decision of Delhi Tribunal in Malana Power Co. Ltd. (ITA No. 3957/1550/Del/2015). 21.2 After going through the cited decisions, prima facie, we concur with the submissions of Ld. AR that considering the purpose test, the subsidies received by the assessee would be capital in nature and therefore, would not form part of normal income as w…

Jmw India Pvt. Ltd., Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle- 13(2), New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 4056/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Vijay Pal Raoassessment Year: 2013-14 Jmw India Pvt. Ltd., Vs Dcit, C-498, 1St Floor, Jojna Vihar, Circle-13(2), Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aaacj3260C (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri C.S. Anand, Advocate & Shri Sankalp Anand, Advocate Revenue By : Ms Anima Barnwal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 26.08.2021 Date Of Pronouncement : 24.09.2021 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 8Th March, 2018 Of The Cit(A)-5, Delhi Relating To Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under:- “1. That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case , The Ld Cit(A) Had Erred In Not Allowing Exclusion Of Interest Subsidy Amounting To Rs. 30,01,143/- & Of Excise Duty Refund Amounting To Rs. 4,98,49,144/-, Being Capital In Nature, In Computing Book Profit U/S 115Jb . 2. That On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case ,The Book Profit U/S 115Jb Ought To Had Been Computed At A Negative Figure, As Per The Revised Computation Of Income Filed By The Assessee.”

For Appellant: Shri C.S. Anand, Advocate &For Respondent: Ms Anima Barnwal, Sr. DR
Section 115JSection 2(24)

…is in appeal before the Tribunal. 6. The ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the issue stands squarely covered in favour of the assessee by the decision of the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Ankit Metal & Power Ltd., reported in 416 ITR 591 where it has been held that where receipt was not in the nature of income it could not be included in the book profits for the purpose of computation u/s 115JB. Therefore, the interest and the power subsidies received by the assessee under the 3 Government schemes would have to be excluded while computing the book profits u/s 115JB since these we…