PCIT v. Ankit

416 ITR 591High Court2019#823 most cited

What is PCIT v. Ankit authority for?

Capital receipts, including interest subsidy received under schemes like TUF, are excluded when computing book profits under Section 115JB of the Income Tax Act. This principle also extends to the reduction of provisions written back from book profits for MAT purposes.

125

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,418 Indian tax judgments — from 2020 to 2025.

Also referred to as

PCIT v. Ankit Metal & Power Ltd. · Ankit · Section 115JB · book profits · Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) · exclusion from book profits · capital receipts · interest subsidy · TUF scheme · provisions written back · Section 2(24)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing PCIT v. Ankit

Reliance Industrial Investment and Holdings Limited, Mumbai vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax 3(3)(1), Mumbai

ITA 1065/MUM/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Mar 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shriamit Shukla, Jm& Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.1065/Mum/2022 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Reliance Industrial Dcit Cir – 3(3)(1), Investment & Holdings 6Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Limited. बिधम/ M. K. Road, 9Th Floor, Maker Chambers Mumbai-400 020 Vs. Iv, 222Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 स्थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./ Pan No.Aaacr5053R (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) : अपीलाथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri Madhur Agrawal, Ld. Ar प्रत्यथीकीओरसे/Respondentby : Shri Jayant Jhaveri, Ld. Cit- Dr सुनवाईकीतारीख/ : 30.11.2023 & 24.03.2023 Date Of Hearing घोषणाकीतारीख / : 29.03.2023 Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Amit Shukla: The Aforesaid Appeal Has Been Filed By The Assessee Against Impugned Order Dated 17.03.2012, Passed By Ld. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Mumbai-3 („Pcit/Cit‟) In His

For Appellant: Shri Madhur Agrawal, Ld. ARFor Respondent: Shri Jayant Jhaveri, Ld. CIT-
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 263

…or the purpose of section 115JB of the Act. The issue of taxing the capital receipt has been dealt by the Calcutta High Court in case of PCIT v. Ankit 31 I.T.A. No. 1065/Mum/2022 Reliance Industrial Investment and Holdings Limited. Metal & Power Ltd. [2019] 416 ITR 591 wherein it was held that the subsidy granted by State Government for setting up new industry in the State, being non-taxable capital receipt, cannot form part of the book profits u/s.115JB of the Act as it does not fall within the definition of “income” u/s.2(24) of the Act. 19. Inaddition to above, the CBDT Circular No 24/2017, itself has exclud…

Acc Limited (Formerly Known As the Associated Cement Companies Ltd.), Mumbai vs. ACIT - Ltu, Mumbai

ITA 417/MUM/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Blem/S. Acc Limited V. Addl. Cit -Range 1(1) (Formerly Known As The Associated Cement Mumbai Companies Ltd.) Cement House, 121, M.K. Road Churchgate, Mumbai-400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent) M/S. Acc Limited V. Asst. Cit-Ltu (Formerly Known As The Associated Mumbai Cement Companies Ltd.) Cement House, 121, M.K. Road Churchgate, Mumbai-400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit – Ltu V. M/S. Acc Limited 28Th Floor, Centre-1 (Formerly Known As The Associated Cement Companies Ltd.) World Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade Cement House, 121, M.K. Road Mumbai - 400005 Churchgate, Mumbai-400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 251Section 44A

…nature, in computing Book Profit u/s 115JB of the Act. 50. Learned representatives fairly agree that the above issues are now covered, in favour of the assessee, by Hon’ble Calcutta High Court’s judgment in the case of PCIT Vs Ankit metal & Power Ltd [(2019) 416 ITR 591 (Cal)], by Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court’s judgment in the case of CIT Vs Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd [ITA No 1132 of 2014, dated 4th January 2017] and by a coordinate bench decision in the case of ACIT Vs JSW Steel Limited [(2019) 112 taxmann.com 55 (Mum)]. Learned Departmental Representative, however, relied upon the stand of the authorities…

Addl CIT RG 1(1), Mumbai vs. Acc Ltd, Mumbai

ITA 5692/MUM/2011[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Blem/S. Acc Limited V. Addl. Cit -Range 1(1) (Formerly Known As The Associated Cement Mumbai Companies Ltd.) Cement House, 121, M.K. Road Churchgate, Mumbai-400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent) M/S. Acc Limited V. Asst. Cit-Ltu (Formerly Known As The Associated Mumbai Cement Companies Ltd.) Cement House, 121, M.K. Road Churchgate, Mumbai-400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit – Ltu V. M/S. Acc Limited 28Th Floor, Centre-1 (Formerly Known As The Associated Cement Companies Ltd.) World Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade Cement House, 121, M.K. Road Mumbai - 400005 Churchgate, Mumbai-400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 145ASection 251Section 44A

…nature, in computing Book Profit u/s 115JB of the Act. 50. Learned representatives fairly agree that the above issues are now covered, in favour of the assessee, by Hon’ble Calcutta High Court’s judgment in the case of PCIT Vs Ankit metal & Power Ltd [(2019) 416 ITR 591 (Cal)], by Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court’s judgment in the case of CIT Vs Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd [ITA No 1132 of 2014, dated 4th January 2017] and by a coordinate bench decision in the case of ACIT Vs JSW Steel Limited [(2019) 112 taxmann.com 55 (Mum)]. Learned Departmental Representative, however, relied upon the stand of the authorities…