M/S. FDC LIMITED,MUMBAI vs. ADDLL. CIT- 8 (1), MUMBAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeals for both assessment years and dismissed the revenue's appeal. Several grounds were decided in favor of the assessee, including issues related to transfer pricing adjustments, deduction for R&D expenses, disallowance of promotional items, and disallowance under Section 14A.
What were the facts?
The assessee, M/s FDC Limited, filed appeals for Assessment Years 2010-11 and 2011-12, and the revenue also filed an appeal for AY 2010-11. The appeals involved issues related to transfer pricing, deduction claims under Section 35(2AB), disallowance of promotional expenses, and other miscellaneous adjustments.
What were the issues?
Key issues included the determination of Arm's Length Price (ALP) for international transactions, eligibility for weighted deductions for R&D expenses, and the allowability of promotional expenses incurred for business purposes.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 35(2AB),Section 37(1),Section 14A,Section 115JB,Section 234C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(24)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. v. CIT5,834 citing229 ITR 383 · 1998 · SC
- CIT v. HDFC Bank Ltd.1,261 citing366 ITR 505 · 2014 · HC
- ACIT v. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.882 citing165 ITD 27 · 2017 · ITAT
- CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son581 citing352 ITR 480 · 2013 · SC
- CIT v. Ponni Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.577 citing306 ITR 392 · 2008 · SC · Read judgment
- Sesa Goa Ltd. v. JCIT291 citing117 Taxmann.com 96 · 2020 · HC
- CIT v. Claris Lifesciences Ltd.196 citing326 ITR 251 · 2010 · HC
- PCIT v. Ankit125 citing416 ITR 591 · 2019 · HC
- CIT v. Sadhu Forging Ltd.73 citing200 Taxmann 1 · 2011 · Read judgment
- PCIT v. Nitin Spinners Ltd.59 citing116 Taxmann.com 26 · 2020 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Kap Scan and Diagnostic Centre (P.) Ltd.58 citing344 ITR 476 · 2012 · HC
- Dy. CIT v. Harjivandas Juthabhai Zaveri44 citing258 ITR 785 · 2002 · HC
- JCIT v. Rolta India Ltd.44 citing330 ITR 470 · 2011 · SC · Read judgment
- Sobha Developers Ltd. v. DCIT44 citing125 Taxmann.com 72 · 2021 · HC
- Dy. CIT v. PHL Pharma (P.) Ltd.38 citing78 Taxmann.com 36 · 2017 · ITAT
- CIT v. Ashok Kumar Jain34 citing372 ITR 507 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Kwality Biscuits Ltd.32 citing284 ITR 434 · 2006 · SC
- CIT v. Khader Khan Sons.24 citing369 ITR 145 · 2014 · HC
- 236 ITR 832 (Guj) (para 21) Snowcem India Ltd. v. Deputy CIT21 citing313 ITR 170 · 2009 · HC
- CIT v. Natural Gems Ltd.16 citing327 ITR 269 · 2010 · HC
- 1. M/s. Solvay Pharma India Ltd. v. PCIT12 citing89 Taxmann.com 249 · 2018 · ITAT
- DCIT v. STP Ltd.10 citing93 Taxmann.com 213 · 2018
- Pr. CIT v. Caraf Builders & Constructions (P) Ltd.9 citing11 Taxmann.com 322 · HC
- Advance Enzyme Technologies P Ltd. v. ACIT5 citing116 Taxmann.com 498 · 2002 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “K” BENCH, MUMBAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH, VP & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
Heard together (3 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आदेशाि सार/ BY ORDER,
उप/सहायक पुंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.Registrar) आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण, मुिंबई / ITAT, Mumbai.
55 M/s FDC Limited Assessment Years: 2010-11 & 2011-12 Sr. No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictation sheets are attached Directly Typed Sr.PS/PS on Computer / Laptop 2 Draft dictated on Not Applicable/ Sr.PS/PS 3 Draft Placed before author Not Applicable Sr.PS/PS 4 Draft proposed & placed before the Second Member JM/AM 5 Draft discussed/approved by Second Member JM/AM 6 Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS 02.11.2021 Sr.PS/PS 7 Order pronouncement on 08.10.2021 Sr.PS/PS 8 File sent to the Bench Clerk 02.11.2021 Sr.PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the AR 11 Date of Dispatch of order
More judgments on Section 35(2AB)
- Aeon Formulations Private Limited, Chennai vs Income Tax Officer, Corporate Ward 2(1)…ITA 2481/CHNY/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Devarsons Industries Pvt.Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The D.C.I.T. Circle-1(1)(1), AhmedabadITA 2327/AHD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Ceat Limited, Mumbai vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income-Tax…ITA 8146/MUM/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
- Forbes Marshall Pvt. Ltd., Pune vs Income Tax Officer Circle 8, PuneITA 3206/PUN/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Pochjraja Industries Ltd., Hosur vs ACIT, Circle-1, HosurITA 1072/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026