New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT

296 ITR 495High Court2008#218 most cited

What is New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT authority for?

The High Court can return a reference unanswered if the assessee fails to appear or provide assistance. This illustrates the broader principle that appellate authorities have inherent power to dismiss appeals for non-prosecution when a party does not effectively pursue their case.

351

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT · 296 ITR 495 · dismissal for non-prosecution · assessee non-appearance · failure to assist court · High Court reference unanswered · Section 250(6) · inherent power to dismiss appeal · effective pursuit of appeal

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT

Surinder Kumar Gupta, Delhi vs. DCIT, New Delhi

ITA 4870/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi14 Jan 2016AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S.V. Mehrotra : & Ms. Suchitra Kamble:Asstt. Yrs: 2011-12 Surinder Kumar Gupta, Vs. Dcit Central Circle-2, 45/6B, Mall Road, Delhi. New Delhi. Pan: Aaehs 7458 G ( Appellant ) (Respondent) Appellant By : None Respondent By : Shri Amrit Lal Date Of Hearing : 11/12/2015. Date Of Order : 12/01/2016. O R D E R Per S.V. Mehrotra, A.M..: This Appeal, By The Assessee , Has Been Preferred Against The Order Dated 10- 06-2015, Passed By The Cit(A)-I, New Delhi, In Appeal No. 319/14-15, Relating To A.Y. 2011-12. 2. At The Time Of Hearing None Put In Appearance On Behalf Of The Assessee Despite Personal Knowledge Of The Date Of Hearing As Is Apparent From The Order Sheet Dated 09.11.2015, When The Hearing Was Adjourned At The Request Of Assessee’S Counsel To 11.12.2015 & Both The Parties Were Intimated Of The Date Fixed In The Open Court. This Time The Assessee Has Not Cared Even To Apply For Adjournment. It Gives An Impression That The Assessee Is Not Serious In Pursuing The Present Appeal Filed. Considering The Facts Of The Case & Keeping In View The Provisions Of Rule 19(2) Of The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal Rules As Were Considered In The Case Of Cit Vs. Multiplan India Ltd., (38 Itd 320)(Del), The Assessee’S Appeal Is Liable To Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution. 3. The Hon'Ble Madhya Pradesh High Court In The Case Of Estate Of Late Tukojirao Holkar Vs. Cwt (223 Itr 480) Has Held As Under:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Amrit Lal

…earing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference. " 4. Similarly, Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of New Diwan Oil Mills vs. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) returned the reference unanswered since the assessee remained absent and there was not any assistance from the assessee. 5. Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the sa…