Jai Janta Trading Co., New Delhi vs. ITO, New Delhi
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed
ITA 3414/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi19 Oct 2015AY 2007-08
Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Smt. Beena A. Pillai, Jm Ita No. 3414/Del/2011 : Asstt. Year : 2007-08 Jai Janta Trading Co., Vs Income Tax Officer, 2730, 1St Floor, Naya Bazar, Ward-29(1), Drum Shaped Delhi-110006 Building, I.P. Estate, New Delhi-110002 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaafj2040H Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. K. Jain, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 19.10.2015 Date Of Pronouncement : 19.10.2015 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am: This Is An Appeal By The Assessee Against The Order Dated 15.06.2011 Of Ld. Cit(A)-Xxv, New Delhi. 2. Earlier This Case Was Disposed Off Vide Order Dated 10.01.2012. Thereafter The Assessee Moved Miscellaneous Application For Recalling The Ex-Parte Order & Vide Order Dated 04.09.2015 In M.A. No. 173/Del/2012, The Order Dated 10.01.2012 Was Recalled & The Date Of Hearing For Today I.E. 19.10.2015 Was Announced On The Said Date In The Open Court, This Fact Is Mentioned In The Order Dated 04.09.2015. However, At The Time Of Hearing Nobody Was Present On Behalf Of The Assessee Nor Any Adjournment Was Sought. It, Therefore, 2 Jai Janta Trading Co. Appears That The Assessee Is Not Interested To Prosecute The Matter.
For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. K. Jain, Sr. DR
…hearing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference.” 5. Similarly, Hon’ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of New Diwan Oil Mills vs. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) returned the reference unanswered since the assessee remained absent and there was not any assistance from the assessee. 6. Their Lordships of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that 3 Jai Janta Trading Co. the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but ef…