New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT

296 ITR 495High Court2008#218 most cited

What is New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT authority for?

The High Court can return a reference unanswered if the assessee fails to appear or provide assistance. This illustrates the broader principle that appellate authorities have inherent power to dismiss appeals for non-prosecution when a party does not effectively pursue their case.

351

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT · 296 ITR 495 · dismissal for non-prosecution · assessee non-appearance · failure to assist court · High Court reference unanswered · Section 250(6) · inherent power to dismiss appeal · effective pursuit of appeal

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing New Diwan Oil Mills v. CIT

Jetha Nand Nagdev HUF, Delhi vs. CIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed for non-prosecution

ITA 1290/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 May 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. H.S. Sidhu & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2009-10 Jetha Nand Nagdev, Huf, C/O- Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Anil Agarwal, Advoate, F-11/32, Delhi-Xiii, New Delhi Krishna Nagar, Delhi Gir/Pan : Aachj7560A (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By None Respondent By Sh. T. Vasanthan, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing 24.05.2016 Date Of Pronouncement 27.05.2016 Order Per O.P. Kant, A.M.: This Appeal, By The Assessee, Is Directed Against Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), Dated 06.01.2014 For Assessment Year 2009-10 2. On 22.02.2016, When The Case Was Called Upon, No One Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee & The Case Was Adjourned For 24.05.2016. Again On 24.05.2016, Neither Any One Appeared, Nor Any Application For Adjournment Has Been Received On Behalf Of The Assessee Despite Issuance Of Notice For Hearing Through Rpad At The Address Furnished By The Assessee In Column 10 Of The Memo Of Appeal In Form No. 36. It Gives An Impression That Assessee Is Not Interested In Pursuing Its Appeal. 3. Considering The Facts Of The Case & Keeping In View The Provisions Of Rule 19(2) Of The Income-Tax (Appellate Tribunal) Rules, 1963 As Were Considered In The Case Of Cit Vs. Multiplan India Ltd., (38 Itd 320)(Del), The Assessee’S Appeal Is Liable To Be Dismissed For Want Of Prosecution.

…earing, or fails in taking steps for preparation of the paper books so as to enable hearing of the reference, the court is not bound to answer the reference. " 4. Similarly, Hon'ble Punjab & Haryana High Court in the case of New Diwan Oil Mills vs. CIT (2008) 296 ITR 495) returned the reference unanswered since the assessee remained absent and there was not any assistance from the assessee. 5. Their Lordships of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. B. Bhattachargee & Another (118 ITR 461 at page 477-478) held that the appeal does not mean, mere filing of the memo of appeal but effectively pursuing the sam…