How many judgments cite Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO?

220 judgments on BharatTax cite Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO (70 Taxmann.com 227), spanning 2017 to 2026.

Which sections of the Income Tax Act does Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO come up under?

It is most often cited in judgments turning on Section 263, Section 143(3), Section 147, Section 148, Section 142(1), Section 10(37).

Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO

70 Taxmann.com 227Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2016#407 most cited

What is Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO authority for?

Before revising an assessment order under Section 263, the CIT/PCIT must conduct their own inquiries or verifications to establish that the Assessing Officer's order is erroneous and unsustainable in law, rather than merely directing further inquiry or pointing out the AO's lack of inquiry.

220

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO · Section 263 · revisional powers · PCIT · erroneous and prejudicial · inadequate enquiry by AO · Commissioner's own inquiry · assessment order unsustainable · Malabar Industrial · Section 143(3)

Sections most often in play

Section 263 Section 143(3)Section 147 Section 148 Section 142(1)Section 10(37)Section 145A(b)Section 151

Issues it is cited on

public servant inadequate enquiry section 263(1)lack of enquiry prejudicial to interest of revenue malabar industrial revision u/s 263 revision under section 263 assessment order erroneous erroneous and prejudicial non application of mind section 119

Judgments citing Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO

Britannia Industries Ltd., Kolkata vs. PCIT-1, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 177/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata01 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Rajpal Yadav & Shri Girish Agrawalassessment Year: 2017-18 Britannia Industries Ltd. Principal Commissioner Of 5/1A, Hungerford Street, Income-Tax Vs. Shakespeare Sarani, Circle-1 Kolkata-700 017 Kolkata (Pan: Aabcb2066P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present For: Appellant By : Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, Fca Respondent By : Shri Sudipta Guha, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 18.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 01.08.2022 O R D E R Per Girish Agrawal: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Revisionary Order Of Ld. Pr. Cit, Kolkata-1 Vide Order No. Itba/Rev5/2021- 22/1040498620(1) Dated 09.03.2022 For A.Y. 2017-18 U/S. 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As ‘The Act’).

For Appellant: Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, FCAFor Respondent: Shri Sudipta Guha, CIT, DR

Section 142(1)Section 143Section 143(3)Section 263Section 35Section 35(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2017-18 Britannia Industries Ltd. Principal Commissioner of 5/1A, Hungerford Street, Income-tax Vs. Shakespeare Sarani, Circle-1 Kolkata-700 017 Kolkata (PAN: AABCB2066P) (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Appellant by : Shri Akkal Dudhwewala, FCA Respondent by : Shri Sudipta Guha, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 18.05.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 01.08.2022 O R D E R PER GIRISH AGRAWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the rev…

M/S. Haris Marine Products, Mangaluru vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 383/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore29 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Vice Preseident & Shri Padmavathy S

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Susan Dolores George, CIT(OSD)

Section 143Section 153DSection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESEIDENT AND SHRI PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.383 /Bang/2022 Assessment year : 2017-18 M/s. Haris Marine Products, Vs. The Principal Commissioner of Trinity Commercial Complex, Income Tax [Central], N.G. Road, Attavara, Bengaluru. Mangaluru – 575 001. PAN: AAAFH 9819G APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate Respondent by : Smt. Susan Dolores George, CIT(OSD) Date of hearing : 21.07.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 29.07.2022 O R D E R Per Padmavathy S., Accountant Member This appeal…

Nekkanti Systems Private Limited, Hyderabad vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-16(2), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

ITA 637/HYD/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year : 2014-15 Nekkanti Systems Private Vs. Income Tax Officer, Limited, Ward – 16(2), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. Pan : Aaccn1440J. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Deputy Vs. Nekkanti Systems Private Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, Hyderabad. Circle – 16(1), Pan : Aaccn1440J. Hyderabad. Assessee By: Sri S. Rama Rao. Revenue By: Sri Rajendra Kumar – Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 18.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.07.2022 O R D E R Per Laliet Kumar, J.M. These Are The Two Connected Appeals Filed By The Assessee & Revenue For A.Y. 2014-15 & 2015-16 Against The Orders Of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Hyderabad Dt.29.03.2019 U/S 263 Of The Act & Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) – 4, Hyderabad Dt.23.01.2019 U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, Respectively.

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Sri Rajendra Kumar – CIT DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL Hyderabad ‘ A ‘ Bench, Hyderabad Before Before Shri Rama Kanta Panda, Accountant Member AND Shri Laliet Kumar, Judicial Member Assessment Year : 2014-15 Nekkanti Systems Private Vs. Income Tax Officer, Limited, Ward – 16(2), Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN : AACCN1440J. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessment Year : 2015-16 The Deputy Vs. Nekkanti Systems Private Commissioner of Limited, Income Tax, Hyderabad. Circle – 16(1), PAN : AACCN1440J. Hyderabad. Assessee by: Sri S. Rama Rao. Revenue by: Sri Rajendra Kumar – CIT DR Date of hearing: 18.07.2022 Date of pronouncement: 27.07.2022 O…

Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-16(1), Hyderabad vs. Nekkanti Systems Private Limited, Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal of Revenue in ITA No

ITA 484/HYD/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad27 Jul 2022AY 2015-16

For Appellant: Sri S. Rama RaoFor Respondent: Sri Rajendra Kumar – CIT DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

Sadhu Salian, Udupi vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central, Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal by the assessee is allowed

ITA 457/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore27 Jul 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Vice Preseident & Shri Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2018-19

For Appellant: Shri V. Srinivasan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Susan Dolores George, CIT(OSD)

Section 143Section 153DSection 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, VICE PRESEIDENT AND SHRI PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment year : 2018-19 Sadhu Salian, Vs. The Principal Commissioner of D.No.16, MMV Bhavan, Income Tax [Central], Bunder Malpe, Bengaluru. Udupi – 576 106. PAN: ASZPS 5632F APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri V. Srinivasan, Advocate Respondent by : Smt. Susan Dolores George, CIT(OSD) Date of hearing : 21.07.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 27.07.2022 O R D E R Per Padmavathy S., Accountant Member This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Principal C…

Privilege Industries Ltd., Mumbai vs. Pr. CIT - 14, Mumbai

In the result, appeal is dismissed

ITA 3317/MUM/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Jul 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi, Am & Ms. Kavitha Rajagopal, Jm Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax– M/S Privilege Industries Ltd. 14 3Rd Floor, Dheeraj Arma, Anant Room No. 415, Vs. Kanekar Marg, 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051 Maharshi Karve Road, Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaecs6532N

For Appellant: Mr. Nimesh Thar, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Sanjay V. Deshmukh, DR

Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 263Section 56(2)(viib)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM AND MS. KAVITHA RAJAGOPAL, JM Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax– M/s Privilege Industries Ltd. 14 3rd Floor, Dheeraj Arma, Anant Room no. 415, Vs. Kanekar Marg, 4th Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Bandra (E), Mumbai-400 051 Maharshi Karve Road, Mumbai-400 020 (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN No. AAECS6532N Assessee by : Mr. Nimesh Thar, AR Revenue by : Mr. Sanjay V. Deshmukh, DR 22.06.2022 Date of hearing: Date of pronouncement : 26.07.2022 O R D E R Per PRASHANT MAHARISHI, AM: 01. This appeal is filed by the assessee against the orde…

Vanishree Holabsu Shettar, Guledgudd vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hubli

In the result, the appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee

ITA 270/BANG/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore25 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri George George K. & Ms. Padmavathy Sassessment Year : 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Ravi Shankar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Srinivas T. Bidari, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru

Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K., JUDICIAL MEMBER AND Ms. PADMAVATHY S, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment year : 2017-18 Vanishree Holabasu Shettar, Vs. The Principal Commissioner # 1, Hiral Street, of Income Tax, Behind Darak Medical, Hubli. Post : Guledgudd – 587 203. PAN: AEKPM 1689M APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by : Shri Ravi Shankar, Advocate Respondent by : Shri Srinivas T. Bidari, CIT(DR)(ITAT), Bengaluru. Date of hearing : 14.07.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 25.07.2022 O R D E R Per Padmavathy S., Accountant Member This appeal by the assessee is agai…

Sh. Surender Meena, 36, Pratap Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur vs. PCIT-1, Jaipur

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 162/JPR/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Jul 2022AY 2017-18

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Avdhesh Kumar (CIT)

Section 142(1)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 54Section 54F

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,’A’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM deys’k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 162/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2017-18 cuke Shri Surender Meena PCIT, Vs. 36, Pratap Nagar, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur-1 Jaipur LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: ACFPM 8554Q vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Avdhesh Kumar…

Sh. Narendar Kumar Agarwal, Jawali Bhawan, Station Road, Alwar vs. PCIT, Jaipur-1, Jaipur

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 133/JPR/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur21 Jul 2022AY 2012-13

For Appellant: Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA)For Respondent: Sh. Avdhesh Kumar (CIT)

Section 139Section 143(3)Section 148Section 263Section 271FSection 50CSection 54F

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,’A’ JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM deys’k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 133/JP/2022 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year :2012-13 cuke Sh. Narendra Kumar Agarwal PCIT, Vs. Jawali Bhawan, Station Road, Jaipur-1 Alwar LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No.: AKEPA 0553 E vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by : Sh. P. C. Parwal (CA) jktLo dh vksj ls@ Revenue by : Sh. Avdhesh Ku…

Shri Hiralal D. Thakkar, Ahmedabad vs. The Pr. CIT (Central), Ahmedabad

ITA 1073/AHD/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Jul 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & T.R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Divyang Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, CIT-DR

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263Section 263(1)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘A’ अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, AHMEDABAD (Conducted Through Virtual Court) ] ] BEFORE S/SHRI PRAMOD M. JAGTAP, VICE PRESIDENT AND T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.1072 & 1073/Ahd/2018 Assessment Year :2008-09 & 2009-10 AND Assessment Year : 2010-11 Shri Hiralal D. Thakkar Pr.CIT (Central) Satkar Guest House Vs Ahmedabad. Swaminarayan Kutir S.G. Highway, Opp: YMCA Club Nr.Nirma Firm Ahmedabad अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/(Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Divyang Shah, AR Revenue by : Shri Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, CIT-DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date o…

Shri Hiralal D. Thakkar, Ahmedabad vs. The Pr. CIT (Central), Ahmedabad

ITA 1072/AHD/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad07 Jul 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & T.R. Senthil Kumar

For Appellant: Shri Divyang Shah, ARFor Respondent: Shri Vijay Kumar Jaiswal, CIT-DR

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263Section 263(1)

M/S. Anand Projects Ltd., Mumbai vs. Pr. CIT-2, Mumbai

ITA 813/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Blem/S. Anand Projects Limited V. Pr.Cit – 2 19/3, Sujata Building Room No. 344, 3Rd Floor Rani Sati Marg, Malad (East) Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400097 Mumbai - 400020 Pan: Aaact1389G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri Chetan Shah Department By : Smt Shailaja Rai

For Appellant: Shri Chetan ShahFor Respondent: Smt Shailaja Rai

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN, HON'BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s. Anand Projects Limited v. Pr.CIT – 2 19/3, Sujata Building Room No. 344, 3rd Floor Rani Sati Marg, Malad (East) Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Mumbai-400097 Mumbai - 400020 PAN: AAACT1389G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri Chetan Shah Department by : Smt Shailaja Rai Date of Hearing : 08.06.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 29.06.2022 O R D E R PER S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (AM) 1. This appeal is filed by the assessee against order of the Principal C…

Mayur Khara, Yavatmal vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Nagpur

In the result, Both the appeals of above mentioned assessee’s are allowed

ITA 64/NAG/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Nagpur28 Jun 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Sandeep Gosain, Jm & Shri Arun Khodpia, Am Assessment Year: 2016-17 Shri Mayur Khara Vs. The Pcit Datta Chowk Nagpur-2 Yavatmalm 445 001 (Maharastra) Pan No.:Abwpk 8869 N Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2016-17 Shri Amit Khara Vs. The Pcit Datta Chowk Nagpur-2 Yavatmalm 445 001 (Maharastra) Pan No.:Abwpk 8868 P Appellant Respondent Assessee By: Shri Mahavir Atal, Ca Revenue By :Shri Piyush Kolhe (Cit-Dr) Date Of Hearing: 28/04/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 Order Per: Sandeep Gosain, J.M. Both These Appeals Have Been Filed By The Above Mentioned Assessees Against Two Different Orders Passed U/S 263 Of The Act By The Ld. Pr.Cit, Nagpur- 2 Dated 17-02-2017 & 16-02-20217 For The Assessment Year 2016-17 Respectively. The Grounds Of Raised By The Above Mentioned Assessees Are As Under:-

For Appellant: Shri Mahavir Atal, CAFor Respondent: Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR)

Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR BEFORE SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI ARUN KHODPIA, AM Assessment Year: 2016-17 Shri Mayur Khara Vs. The PCIT Datta Chowk Nagpur-2 Yavatmalm 445 001 (Maharastra) PAN No.:ABWPK 8869 N Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2016-17 Shri Amit Khara Vs. The PCIT Datta Chowk Nagpur-2 Yavatmalm 445 001 (Maharastra) PAN No.:ABWPK 8868 P Appellant Respondent Assessee by: Shri Mahavir Atal, CA Revenue by :Shri Piyush Kolhe (CIT-DR) Date of Hearing: 28/04/2022 Date of Pronouncement: 28 /06 /2022 ORDER PER: SANDEEP GOSAIN, J.M. Both these appeals have been filed by t…

Goldiam Jewellery Ltd., Mumbai vs. The Pr. CIT (Central)-1, Mumbai

In the result, appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 729/MUM/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Shekhar L. Gajbhiye, CIT–DR

Section 10ASection 142Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 253(1)(c)Section 263Section 263(1)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “G” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI SANDEEP SINGH KARHAIL, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.729/Mum./2021 (Assessment Year : 2010–11) ITA No.728/Mum./2021 (Assessment Year : 2011–12) Goldiam Jewellery Ltd. G–10, Ground Floor, Gems & Jewellery Complex–II ……………. Appellant SEEPZ SEZ, Andheri (East) Mumbai 400 096 PAN – AACCG3424F v/s Principal Commissioner of Income Tax ……………. Respondent Central Circle–1, Mumbai Assessee by : Shri Madhur Agrawal Revenue by : Shri Shekhar L. Gajbhiye, CIT–DR Date of Hearing – 08.03.2022 Date of Order – 01/06/2…

Goldiam Jewellery Ltd., Mumbai vs. Pr. CIT (Central)-1, Mumbai

In the result, appeals by the assessee are allowed

ITA 728/MUM/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Jun 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri Madhur AgrawalFor Respondent: Shri Shekhar L. Gajbhiye, CIT–DR

Section 10ASection 142Section 143Section 147Section 148Section 253(1)(c)Section 263Section 263(1)

Shri Radha Govind Lashkari, Jaipur vs. PCIT-2, Jaipur

In the result, this appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 32/JPR/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Jaipur12 Apr 2022AY 2015-16

For Appellant: Shri S.R. Sharma (CA) and Shri R.K. Bhatra, (CA)For Respondent: Smt. Savita Bundas, (CIT D/R)

Section 139Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण] जयपुर न्यायपीठ] जयपुर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” VC JAIPUR Jh lanhi xkslkbZ] U;kf;d lnL; ,oa Jh jkBkSM+ deys'k t;arHkkbZ] ys[kk lnL; ds le{k BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 32/JP/2021 fu/kZkj.k o"kZ@Assessment Year : 2015-16. cuke Shri Radha Govind Lashkari, Principal Commissioner of Vs. 16, Shubham Enclave, Income-tax, Jaipur-2, Jamnalal Bajaj Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. Jaipur. LFkk;h ys[kk la-@thvkbZvkj la-@PAN/GIR No. AAHPL 2851 M vihykFkhZ@Appellant izR;FkhZ@Respondent fu/kZkfjrh dh vksj ls@ Assessee by…

Sach Electro Mech Pvt. Ltd., Surat vs. Pr. CIT-2, Surat

In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 392/SRT/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Surat06 Apr 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Pawan Singh & Dr. Arjun Lal Saini(Hearing In Virtual Court)

Section 145ASection 14ASection 254(1)Section 263Section 40A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRI PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (Hearing in Virtual Court) Sach Electro Mech Private Limited Pr. Commissioner of Income C/2, Maheshwari Apartment, Tax-2, Vs. Nanpura, Timaliawad, Room No. 227, 2nd Floor, Surat. Aayakar Bhawan, Majura Gate, PAN : AAICS 8963 M Surat-395001 APPELLANT RESPONDEDNT Appellant by Shri Rasesh Shah, CA Respondent by Shri H. P. Meena, CIT-DR Date of hearing 21/01/2022 Date of pronouncement 06/04/2022 Order under section 254(1) of Income Tax Act PER PAWAN SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER: Thi…

Gurbakshish Singh Batra, New Delhi vs. Pr. CIT - 12, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 396/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Mar 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri N.K. Choudhryassessment Year: 2016-17 Gurbakshish Singh Batra, Vs Pr.Cit-12, E-1511, Wazir Nagr, New Delhi. Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi. Pan: Adspb2480J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri R.S. Singhvi, Ca Revenue By : Shri Shashi Bhushan Sukla, Cit, Dr Date Of Hearing : 15.02.2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 31.03.2022 Order Per R.K. Panda, Am: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 22Nd March, 2021 Of The Pcit, Delhi-12, Passed U/S 263 Of The It Act For The Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is An Individual & Filed His Return Of Income On 6Th October, 2016 Declaring The Total Income At Rs.44,86,160/-. The Return Was Processed U/S 143(1) Of The It Act. Subsequently, The Case Of The Assessee Was Selected For ‘Limited Scrutiny’ Based On The Following Reasons:-

For Appellant: Shri R.S. Singhvi, CAFor Respondent: Shri Shashi Bhushan Sukla, CIT, DR

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 263Section 50C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH : C : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R.K. PANDA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI N.K. CHOUDHRY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year: 2016-17 Gurbakshish Singh Batra, Vs Pr.CIT-12, E-1511, Wazir Nagr, New Delhi. Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi. PAN: ADSPB2480J (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri R.S. Singhvi, CA Revenue by : Shri Shashi Bhushan Sukla, CIT, DR Date of Hearing : 15.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement : 31.03.2022 ORDER PER R.K. PANDA, AM: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 22nd March, 2021 of the PCIT, Delhi-12, passed u/s 263 of the…

Britannia Industries Ltd, Bangalore vs. PCIT-1, Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 150/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Mar 2022AY 2016-17

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263Section 35

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENCH “B” KOLKATA Before: Shri Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member and Shri Girish Agrawal, Accountant Member आयकरअपीलसं.य/ Assessment Year:2016-17 बनामV/s. Principal CIT-1, Kolkata M/s. Britannia Industries Ltd. Prestige Shantiniketan Tower Aaykar Bhawan ‘C‘ The Business, 16th& 17th P-7 Chowringhee Square Floor, Whitefield Main Road, Kolkata-69 Mahadevpura Post Bangalore - 560048 PAN: AABCB2066P अपीलाथ" /Appellant ""यथ" /Respondent .. अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/By Appellant Shri N.S. Saini and Ms. Priyanka Salarpuria, Ld. AR ""यथ"क"ओरसे/By Respondent Shri Sudipta Guha, Ld. CIT(DR) सुनवाईक"तार"…

M/S. Veena Patil Hospitality P. Ltd., Mumbai vs. Pr. CIT-8, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 627/MUM/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Feb 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri Pavan Kumar Gadalem/S. Veena Patil Vs. Pcit-8 Hospitality Pvt Ltd Room No. 611, 701To 705, Neelkanth 6Th Floor, Aayakar Corporate Park, Kirol Bhavan, Mk Road, Road, Vidhyavihar Mumbai – 400 020 West, Mumbai - 400086 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaecv4768R Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Shri. Yogesh Thar.C.A. Ar Respondent By : Shri. Achal Sharma.Dr Date Of Hearing 30.11.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 14.02.2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale Jm: The Assessee Has Filed The Appeal Against The Order Of The Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax (Pr.Cit)-8, Mumbai, Passed U/S 263 Of The Act. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Of Appeal:

For Appellant: Shri. Yogesh Thar.C.A. ARFor Respondent: Shri. Achal Sharma.DR

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “F” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER M/s. Veena Patil Vs. PCIT-8 hospitality Pvt Ltd Room No. 611, 701to 705, Neelkanth 6th Floor, Aayakar Corporate Park, kirol Bhavan, MK Road, Road, Vidhyavihar Mumbai – 400 020 West, Mumbai - 400086 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAECV4768R Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Shri. Yogesh Thar.C.A. AR Respondent by : Shri. Achal Sharma.DR Date of Hearing 30.11.2021 Date of Pronouncement 14.02.2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER PAVAN KUMAR GADALE JM: The assesse…