Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO

70 Taxmann.com 227Income Tax Appellate Tribunal2016#407 most cited

What is Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO authority for?

Before revising an assessment order under Section 263, the CIT/PCIT must conduct their own inquiries or verifications to establish that the Assessing Officer's order is erroneous and unsustainable in law, rather than merely directing further inquiry or pointing out the AO's lack of inquiry.

220

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,154 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO · Section 263 · revisional powers · PCIT · erroneous and prejudicial · inadequate enquiry by AO · Commissioner's own inquiry · assessment order unsustainable · Malabar Industrial · Section 143(3)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Narayan Tatu Rane v. ITO

M/S Poonawalla Fincoup Limited, Kolkata vs. PCIT-1, Kolkata

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 218/KOL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Sept 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Sanjay Garg, Hon’Ble & Shri Girish Agrawal, Hon’Blei.T.A. No. 218/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/S. Poonawalla Fincorp Limited Pcit-1, Kolkata Development House Vs 4Th Floor 24, Park Street Kolkata - 700016 Pan : Aabcm9445K अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Ms. Puja Somani, Ca Revenue By : Shri Amitava Bhattacharya, Cit (D/R) सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30/08/2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 26/09/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per Shri Girish Agrawal: This Appeal By The Assessee Is Arising Out Of The Order Of Ld. Pr. Cit – Kolkata-1 Vide Order Itba/Rev/F/Rev5/2021-22/1042104843(1), Dt. 30/03/2022, Passed U/S 263 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961, Hereinafter Referred To As The Act.

For Appellant: Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Ms. PujaFor Respondent: Shri Amitava Bhattacharya, CIT (D/R)
Section 143(3)Section 263

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI SANJAY GARG, HON’BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI GIRISH AGRAWAL, HON’BLE ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No. 218/Kol/2022 Assessment Year: 2017-18 M/s. Poonawalla Fincorp Limited PCIT-1, Kolkata Development House Vs 4th Floor 24, Park Street Kolkata - 700016 PAN : AABCM9445K अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "त् यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri S.K. Tulsiyan, Advocate & Ms. Puja Somani, CA Revenue by : Shri Amitava Bhattacharya, CIT (D/R) सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date of Hearing : 30/08/2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date of Pronouncement: 26/09/2022 आदेश/O R D E R PER SHRI GIR…

M/S. Janatha Fish Meal & Oil Products, Udupi vs. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, (Central), Bengaluru

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 489/BANG/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Bangalore20 Sept 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.V. Vasudevan & Ms.Padmavathy S.M/S. Janatha Fish Meal & Vs Pcit, Central Oil Products C.R. Building D.No. 1-4(9), Manur Fisheries Queen'S Road Road, Kota, Post Kota Bengaluru 560001 Udupi 0576221 Pan – Aaefj1257G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri V. Narendra Sharma, Advocte Revenue By: Shri Manjunath Karkihalli, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 14/09/2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 20/09/2022 O R D E R Per: Padmavathy, A.M. This Appeal Is Against The Revision Order Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act) Dated 28.03.2022 Passed For Ay 2018-19 By The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, (Pcit) Bangalore.

For Appellant: Shri V. Narendra Sharma, AdvocteFor Respondent: Shri Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT-DR
Section 115BSection 143Section 153DSection 263Section 269Section 269SSection 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL BENGALURU “B” BENCH, BENGALURU Before Shri N.V. Vasudevan, Vice President and Ms.Padmavathy S., Accountant Member M/s. Janatha Fish Meal & vs PCIT, Central Oil Products C.R. Building D.No. 1-4(9), Manur Fisheries Queen's Road Road, Kota, Post Kota Bengaluru 560001 Udupi 0576221 PAN – AAEFJ1257G (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri V. Narendra Sharma, Advocte Revenue by: Shri Manjunath Karkihalli, CIT-DR Date of hearing: 14/09/2022 Date of pronouncement: 20/09/2022 O R D E R Per: Padmavathy, A.M. This appeal is against the revision order passed under Section 263 of the In…

Juniper Networks International B.V., Mumbai vs. CIT (International Taxation)-3, Mumbai

In the result, appeal by assessee is allowed

ITA 982/MUM/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai05 Aug 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri M. Balaganeshआअसं. 982/मुं/2021 ("न.व. 2014-15) Juniper Networks International B.V, Boeing Avenue 240, 1119Pz Schipol-Rijk, Amsterdam,0 Netherlands Pan: Aadcj-0974-G ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (It), Mumbai -3, Room No.1601, 16Th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 .....""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant By : Shri J.D.Mistry, Sr. Advocate With Ms. Prachi Mehta &Shri Sandeep Bhalla ""तवाद" "वारा/Respondent By : Ms. Surabhi Sharma & Shri Milind Chavan सुनवाई क" "त"थ/ Date Of Hearing : 13/05/2022 घोषणा क" "त"थ/ Date Of Pronouncement : 05/08/2022 आदेश/Order Per Vikas Awasthy, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri J.D.Mistry, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Prachi Mehta &Shri Sandeep BhallaFor Respondent: Ms. Surabhi Sharma &
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 263

…आयकरअपील"यअ"धकरण मुंबईपीठ“आइ” "ी"वकासअव"थी, "या"यकसद"यएवं "ीएमबालगणेश, लेखाकारसद"यकेसम" IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “I”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI M. BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आअसं. 982/मुं/2021 ("न.व. 2014-15) Juniper Networks International B.V, Boeing Avenue 240, 1119pz Schipol-Rijk, Amsterdam,0 Netherlands PAN: AADCJ-0974-G ...... अपीलाथ"/Appellant बनाम Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (IT), Mumbai -3, Room No.1601, 16th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021 .....""तवाद"/Respondent अपीलाथ" "वारा/ Appellant by : Shri J.D.Mistry, Sr. A…