Kerala in Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO

169 Taxmann.com 45High Court2024#4304 most cited

What is Kerala in Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO authority for?

Penalty under section 271B is not to be imposed on co-operative societies for delayed filing of audit reports if the delay in obtaining reports from statutory auditors under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and Rules constitutes a reasonable cause, and the audit reports are made available before the Assessing Authority at the time of assessment finalization.

27

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2025 to 2025.

Also referred to as

Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO · section 271B · section 44AB · audit report · delayed submission · reasonable cause · co-operative societies · Kerala Co-operative Societies Act · penalty exemption

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Kerala in Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO

KOLLAM DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,KOLLAM vs. ITO, WARD-2, KOLLAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 639/COCH/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Oct 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm Assessment Year: 2017-18 Kollam District Police Department .......... Appellant Employees Co-Operative Society Lt No Q 1179, Near S P Office, Kollam-691001 [Pan: Aacak5573H] Vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Surendranath Rao, Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Assessment Year: 2013-14 Porkulam Service Co-Op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant (Via) Pazhanji, Thalappilly, Thrissur- 680542 [Pan: Aaaap4486A] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, W-1& Tps ......... Respondent Assessee By: ------- None ------- Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 29.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.10.2025 Kollam District Police Deptt. Employees Co.Op. Society & Porkulam Scb O R D E R Per: Anikesh Banerjee, Jm The Instant Appeal Of Both The Assessee Was Filed Against The Order Of The Learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Brevity, ‘Ld. Cit(A)’] Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act’) For Assessment Year 2017-18, Date Of Order 10/07/2025 For Petitioner-1 & For Assessment Year 2013-14, Date Of Order 25/06/2025 For Petitioner-2.The Impugned Orders Were Emanated From The Order Of The Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department (In Short, ‘Ld. Ao’) Order Passed Under Section 271B Of The Act, Date Of Order 12/07/2023 For Ay Petritioner-1 &19/09/2022 For Petitioner-2. 2. Both The Appeals Have Common Issue & Common Fact. So, We Proceed To Dispose Off By Common Order. Ita No. 639/Coch/2025 Is Taken As Lead Case.

For Appellant: Shri Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271BSection 44ASection 80P(2)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM Assessment Year: 2017-18 Kollam District Police Department .......... Appellant Employees Co-operative Society Lt No Q 1179, Near S P Office, Kollam-691001 [PAN: AACAK5573H] vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department ......... Respondent Assessee by: Shri Surendranath Rao, CA Revenue by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Assessment Year: 2013-14 Porkulam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant (VIA) Pazhanji, Thalappilly, Thrissur- 680542 [PAN: AAAAP4486A] vs. The Income Tax Officer, W-1& TPS .........…

PORKULAM SERVICE CO-OP.BANK LTD,THALAPPILLY vs. INCOMETAX OFFICER, GURUVAYOOR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee bearing ITA No

ITA 605/COCH/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Oct 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Anikesh Banerjee, Jm Assessment Year: 2017-18 Kollam District Police Department .......... Appellant Employees Co-Operative Society Lt No Q 1179, Near S P Office, Kollam-691001 [Pan: Aacak5573H] Vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department ......... Respondent Assessee By: Shri Surendranath Rao, Ca Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Assessment Year: 2013-14 Porkulam Service Co-Op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant (Via) Pazhanji, Thalappilly, Thrissur- 680542 [Pan: Aaaap4486A] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, W-1& Tps ......... Respondent Assessee By: ------- None ------- Revenue By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 29.10.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 30.10.2025 Kollam District Police Deptt. Employees Co.Op. Society & Porkulam Scb O R D E R Per: Anikesh Banerjee, Jm The Instant Appeal Of Both The Assessee Was Filed Against The Order Of The Learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [For Brevity, ‘Ld. Cit(A)’] Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (In Short, The Act’) For Assessment Year 2017-18, Date Of Order 10/07/2025 For Petitioner-1 & For Assessment Year 2013-14, Date Of Order 25/06/2025 For Petitioner-2.The Impugned Orders Were Emanated From The Order Of The Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department (In Short, ‘Ld. Ao’) Order Passed Under Section 271B Of The Act, Date Of Order 12/07/2023 For Ay Petritioner-1 &19/09/2022 For Petitioner-2. 2. Both The Appeals Have Common Issue & Common Fact. So, We Proceed To Dispose Off By Common Order. Ita No. 639/Coch/2025 Is Taken As Lead Case.

For Appellant: Shri Surendranath Rao, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 271BSection 44ASection 80P(2)(a)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM AND SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM Assessment Year: 2017-18 Kollam District Police Department .......... Appellant Employees Co-operative Society Lt No Q 1179, Near S P Office, Kollam-691001 [PAN: AACAK5573H] vs. Assessment Unit, Income Tax Department ......... Respondent Assessee by: Shri Surendranath Rao, CA Revenue by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Assessment Year: 2013-14 Porkulam Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant (VIA) Pazhanji, Thalappilly, Thrissur- 680542 [PAN: AAAAP4486A] vs. The Income Tax Officer, W-1& TPS .........…

AMBALAPAD SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD NO 759,KUNDUKAD, THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, THRISSUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 78/COCH/2025[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin23 Jun 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ambalapad Service Co-Op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant Xi/57, Kundukad P.O., Thrissur 680028 [Pan: Aadaa9298G] Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Thrissur .......... Respondent Appellant By: Shri Ramdas M., Ca Respondent By: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date Of Hearing: 28.05.2025 Date Of Pronouncement: 23.06.2025 O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, Am This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Cit(A)] Dated 03.12.2024 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2012-13. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Appellant Is A Co-Operative Society Registered Under The Kerala State Co-Operative Societies Act, 1969. It Is Classified As Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Society. The Appellant Had Not Filed Regular Return Of Income Under The Provisions Of Section 139(1) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (The Act). The Income

For Appellant: Shri Ramdas M., CAFor Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 148Section 271BSection 44A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM AND SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM Assessment Year: 2012-13 Ambalapad Service Co-op. Bank Ltd. .......... Appellant XI/57, Kundukad P.O., Thrissur 680028 [PAN: AADAA9298G] vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(1), Thrissur .......... Respondent Appellant by: Shri Ramdas M., CA Respondent by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 28.05.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 23.06.2025 O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)] dated…

Showing 120 of 27 · Page 1 of 2

Kerala in Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (169 Taxmann.com 45) — Cited in 27 Judgments | BharatTax