KOLLAM DISTRICT POLICE DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,KOLLAM vs. ITO, WARD-2, KOLLAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal referred to the Kerala High Court's decision in Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO, which held that if audit reports are made available before the Assessing Authority at the time of assessment finalization and the delay in obtaining them from statutory auditors under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and Rules is a reasonable cause, then no penalty under section 271B should be imposed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative bank, claimed deduction under section 80P(2)(a). The tax audit report (TAR) was due by 07/11/2017 but was filed on 06/02/2018. The Assessing Officer initiated penalty proceedings under section 271B for non-filing of the TAR within the due date and imposed a penalty of Rs. 1,50,000/-. The CIT(A) upheld the penalty.
What were the issues?
Whether the penalty imposed under Section 271B for delayed filing of the Tax Audit Report is sustainable when the report was submitted before the finalization of assessment and there was a reasonable cause for the delay.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 271B,Section 139(1),Section 80P(2)(a),Section 143(3),Section 44AB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Kerala in Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO27 citing169 Taxmann.com 45 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM
Per: Anikesh Banerjee, JM The instant appeal of both the assessee was filed against the order of the Learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for brevity, ‘Ld. CIT(A)’] passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act’) for Assessment Year 2017-18, date of order 10/07/2025 for petitioner-1 & for Assessment year 2013-14, date
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271B
- Devayatbhai Kalotara, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, RajkotITA 679/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2867/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2866/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2865/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2864/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026