KANIPPAYYUR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,THRISSUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 & TPS, GURUVAYOOR, GURUVAYOOR, THRISSUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the delay in obtaining audit reports from statutory auditors under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act and Rules constituted a reasonable cause for delayed submission. Following the decision of the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO, the penalty levied under section 271B was deemed unsustainable.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative bank, filed its return claiming deduction under section 80P. The case was selected for scrutiny, and during the assessment under section 143(3), it was found that the assessee did not file the tax audit report under section 44AB. A penalty under section 271B was imposed for non-filing of the tax audit report, which was upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether a penalty under section 271B is leviable for delayed filing of a tax audit report when there is a reasonable cause for the delay, citing a High Court precedent.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 271B,Section 139(1),Section 80P,Section 143(3),Section 44AB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Kerala in Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO27 citing169 Taxmann.com 45 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM
Per: Anikesh Banerjee, JM The instant appeal of the assessee was filed against the order of the Learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for brevity, ‘Ld.CIT(A)’] passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act’) for Assessment Year 2017-18, date of order 13/06/2025. The impugned order emanated from the order of the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi (in short, ‘Ld.AO’) passed under section 271B of the Act, date of order 17/01/2022. 2 Kanippayyur Service Co-op. Bank Ltd.
The assessee is a cooperative bank and filed the return U/s 139(1) of the Act. The assessee claimed deduction under section 80P of the Act in its return. The assessee’s case was selected for scrutiny and the assessment was
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271B
- Devayatbhai Kalotara, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, RajkotITA 679/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2867/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2866/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2865/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2864/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026