ANANTHAVOOR SERVICE COOPERATIVE BANK LTD,MALAPPURAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 & TPS, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the penalty levied under Section 271B is unsustainable in law and on facts. The Tribunal followed the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Kerala High Court in the case of Chavakkad Service Co-operative Bank Ltd., where it was held that delay in obtaining audit reports from statutory auditors can be a reasonable cause for delayed submission.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative bank, filed its return of income belatedly. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer (AO) initiated penalty proceedings under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for failure to furnish the Tax Audit Report (TAR) within the due date.
What were the issues?
Whether penalty under section 271B is leviable for delayed filing of Tax Audit Report when the report was available at the time of assessment and there was a reasonable cause for the delay.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 271B,Section 44AB,Section 139(1),Section 143(3),Section 250,Section 80P(2)(a)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Kerala in Chavakkad Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO27 citing169 Taxmann.com 45 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI ANIKESH BANERJEE, JM
Per: Anikesh Banerjee, JM The instant appeal of the assessee was filed against the order of the Learned National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [for brevity, ‘Ld. CIT(A)’] passed under section 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short, the Act’) for Assessment Year 2017-18, date of order 08/07/2025. The impugned order was emanated from the order of the National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi (in short, ‘Ld. AO’) order passed under section 271B of the Act, date of order 10/02/2022. 2 Ananthavoor Service Co-op. Bank Ltd.
The assessee is a cooperative bank and filed the return U/s 139(1) of the Act. The assessee claimed deduction under section 80P(2)(a) of the Act in its return filed on dated 26/01/2018. The asses
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 271B
- Devayatbhai Kalotara, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2, RajkotITA 679/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2867/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2866/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2865/PUN/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Waghire College Saswad, Pune vs ITO, Ward 14(5), PuneITA 2864/PUN/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026