Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gujarat Alkalies Chemicals Limited

395 ITR 247High Court2017#2342 most cited

What is Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gujarat Alkalies Chemicals Limited authority for?

Deduction under Section 80IA is allowable for captive power generation. The price for calculating this deduction is the rate at which the electricity board supplies power to its consumers, rather than the rate at which power generating companies supply to the electricity board.

49

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Commissioner v. Gujarat Alkalies Chemicals Limited · 395 ITR 247 · Section 80IA · deduction captive power · 80IA(8) · specified domestic transaction · Section 92BA · Section 92F · electricity transfer price · consumer electricity rate · Arm's Length Price

Sections most often in play

Section 80IASection 115JBSection 80A(6)Section 14ASection 80IA(8)Section 92BASection 92FSection 143(3)
Read the full judgment

Issues it is cited on

section 80ia(8)section 92f(ii)section 86section 92basection 92fspecified domestic transactiondeduction under section 80iasection 80iaeligible businesstested partydeduction u/s 80iasection 92b

Judgments citing Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gujarat Alkalies Chemicals Limited

Acc Ltd., Mumbai vs. Addl CIT(Ltu), Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed and appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 3139/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble

Section 14Section 143(3)Section 14A

…019 and ors.] (AY 2011-12) (Para 80-85; internal page 47-50) (ii) CIT v. Reliance Industries Ltd [2020] 421 ITR 686 (Bombay) (iii) CIT v. Godawari Power &Ispat Ltd. [(2014) 223 Taxman 234 (Chattisgarh HC)] (iv) PCIT v. Gujarat Alkalies& Chemicals Ltd. [(2017) 395 ITR 247 (Gujarat HC)] (v) West Coast Paper Mills Ltd. v. JCIT (2006) 100 TTJ 833 (Mumbai Trib.) – (vi) Eveready Spinning Mills (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (50 SOT 8) (Chennai) (URO) (vi) ACIT vs. Godavari Power &Ispat LTD (2011) 133 ITD 502 (Bilaspur) (vii) BalrampurChini Mills Ltd (ITA 1672/Kol/2019) (Kolkata ITAT) 57. During the course of appellate hearing, Ld…

DCIT(Ltu) - 1, Mumbai vs. Acc Ltd., Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3246/MUM/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Blem/S. Acc Ltd., V. Dcit – Range – 1(1) Mumbai {Formerly Known As The Associated Cement Companies, Ltd.,} Cement House, 121 M.K. Road, Churchgate Mumbai - 400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit (Ltu)-1 V. M/S. Acc Ltd., 29Th Floor, Centre No.1 Cement House, 121 World Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade M.K. Road, Churchgate Mumbai - 400005 Mumbai - 400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 14A

…lity in computing the market value by taking into account the rate charged to a supplier: it should have been compared with the market value of power supplied to a consumer." 10. Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies& Chemicals Ltd. [2017] 395 ITR 247/88 taxmann.com 722 also had occasion to examine such an issue. It referred to earlier order in case of Asstt. CIT v. Pragati Glass Works (P.) Ltd. [Tax Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, dated 30-1-2012] in which following observations were made:— "7. To our mind, Tribunal has committed no error. Assessing Officer and CIT (Appeals) while adopting Rs. 4.51…

Acc Limited (Formerly Known As the Associated Cement Companies Ltd.), Mumbai vs. Addll. CIT, RG. 1(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3203/MUM/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Feb 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman, Hon'Ble & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Blem/S. Acc Ltd., V. Dcit – Range – 1(1) Mumbai {Formerly Known As The Associated Cement Companies, Ltd.,} Cement House, 121 M.K. Road, Churchgate Mumbai - 400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit (Ltu)-1 V. M/S. Acc Ltd., 29Th Floor, Centre No.1 Cement House, 121 World Trade Centre, Cuffe Parade M.K. Road, Churchgate Mumbai - 400005 Mumbai - 400020 Pan: Aaact1507C (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 14A

…lity in computing the market value by taking into account the rate charged to a supplier: it should have been compared with the market value of power supplied to a consumer." 10. Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies& Chemicals Ltd. [2017] 395 ITR 247/88 taxmann.com 722 also had occasion to examine such an issue. It referred to earlier order in case of Asstt. CIT v. Pragati Glass Works (P.) Ltd. [Tax Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, dated 30-1-2012] in which following observations were made:— "7. To our mind, Tribunal has committed no error. Assessing Officer and CIT (Appeals) while adopting Rs. 4.51…

Bharathi Cement Corporation Private Limited, Hyderabad vs. DCIT Circle-2(1), Hyderabad

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 159/HYD/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad17 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Laliet Kumarassessment Year: 2017-18 Bharathi Cement Corporation Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Private Limited, Income Tax, Hyderabad. Circle – 2(1), Hyderabad. Pan : Aadcr3079G. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By: Shri S. Kalyanasundaram, Ca Revenue By: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing: 14.02.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 17.02.2023

For Appellant: Shri S. Kalyanasundaram, CAFor Respondent: Shri Jeevan Lal Lavidiya
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144CSection 144C(5)Section 80

…I.T.A. No.127/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Star Paper Mills Limited [2014] 42 taxmann.com 551/223 Taxman 234, in which the Court held and observed as under: ....... 10. Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. [2017] 395 ITR 247/88 taxmann.com 722 also had occasion to examine such an issue. It referred to earlier order in case of Asstt. CIT v. Pragati Glass Works (P.) Ltd. [Tax Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, dated 30-1- 2012] in which following observations were made:-- ....... 21 11. Judgment of Calcutta High Court in case of CIT v. ITC Ltd. [2016] 236 Taxman 612/[2015] 64…

Gujarat Fluorochemicals Limited., Vadodara vs. The DCIT, Circle-1(1)(1), Vadodara

The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 751/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad28 Dec 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Mrs. Annapurna Gupta & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumar"नधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd., Vs. Dcit, 2Nd Floor, Abs Tower, Old Circle 1(1)(1), Padra Road, Baroda-390007 Baroda Pan : Aaacg 6725 H अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate & Shri Parin Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Samir Tekriwal, Cit-Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 11.10.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 28.12.2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per Annapurna Gupta:

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr. Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Samir Tekriwal, CIT-DR
Section 115Section 115JSection 14ASection 14A(2)Section 8D(2)(i)

…at the rate on which the GEB supplied power to its customers ignoring the rate at which the power generating company supplied to the GEB. This issue is directly covered by the decision of this Court in the case of CIT vs. Gujarat Alkalies and Chemicals Ltd.; 395 ITR 247. It is also covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of M/s. Alembic Ltd. (Tax Appeal No.553 &554 of 2017). It appears that Special Leave Petitions filed by the revenue are pending before the Supreme Court questioning the correctness of the view taken by this Court in the aforesaid two judgments. So far as the Gujarat Alkalies and…

Century Textiles and Industries Limited, Mumbai vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax – 6(2)(1), Mumbai

Accordingly, the grounds raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 2085/MUM/2022[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Dec 2022AY 2009-2010
Section 80Section 801ASection 80I

…lues, it is rational and reasonable to adopt the rate at which the State Electricity Board Supplies electricity to similar types of consumers at the market value. The assessee also relied upon the cases i.e Principal CIT Vs. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. (395 ITR 247), West Coast Paper Mills Vs. Jt. CIT(100 TTJ 833), ACIT VS. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. (16 SOT 509) & CIT Vs. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd., 42 Taxmann.com 551. However, on the other hand, the Ld. Representative of the Department has refuted the said contentions. Taking into account, facts and circumstances of the case, we noticed that the issue in…

Asst Comm of Income Tax -6(1) (1), Mumbai vs. Century Textiles and Industries Ltd, Mumbai

Accordingly, the grounds raised by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 1967/MUM/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 Dec 2022AY 2011-12
Section 80Section 801ASection 80I

…lues, it is rational and reasonable to adopt the rate at which the State Electricity Board Supplies electricity to similar types of consumers at the market value. The assessee also relied upon the cases i.e Principal CIT Vs. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. (395 ITR 247), West Coast Paper Mills Vs. Jt. CIT(100 TTJ 833), ACIT VS. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. (16 SOT 509) & CIT Vs. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd., 42 Taxmann.com 551. However, on the other hand, the Ld. Representative of the Department has refuted the said contentions. Taking into account, facts and circumstances of the case, we noticed that the issue in…

Asstt Comm of Income Tax 6(1) (1), Mumbai vs. Century Textiles & Industries Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 1886/MUM/2022[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Nov 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey, Jm & Shri S Rifaur Rahman, Am आयकरअपीलसं/ I.T.A. No.1886 /Mum/2022 (निर्धारणवर्ा / Assessment Year: 2010-11) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax बिधम/ Century Textiles & Industries Ltd 6(1)(1) Vs. 2Nd Floor, Century Bhavan, Room No. 504, Aaykar Bhavan, Dr Annie Besant Road, M.K.Road, Churchgate, Worli, Mumbai- 400030 Mumbai- 400020 स्थधयीलेखधसं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. : Aaacc2659Q (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Assessee By: Shri. Yogesh Thar Revenue By: Shri. Asif Karmani, Sr Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख / Date Of Hearing: 26/10/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement: 29/11/2022 आदेश / O R D E R Per Aby T. Varkey, Jm:

For Appellant: Shri. Yogesh TharFor Respondent: Shri. Asif Karmani, Sr AR
Section 263Section 80Section 801ASection 80I

…ues, it is rational and reasonable to adopt the rate at which the State Electricity Board Supplies electricity to similar types of consumers at the market value. The assessee also relied upon the cases i.e. Principle CIT Vs. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. (395 ITR 247). West Coast Paper Mills Vs. Jt. CIT(100 TTJ 833). ACIT Vs. Jindal Steel & Power Ltd. (16 SOT 509) & CIT Vs. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd., 42 Taxmann.com 551. However, on the other hand, the Ld. Representative of the Department has refuted the said contentions. Taking into account, facts and circumstances of the case, we noticed that the issue in…

M/S. Coromandel Sugars Ltd., Chennai vs. DCIT, CC - 1 (2), Chennai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 3391/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Nov 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 3390 & 3391/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2005-06 & 2013 - 14 Coromandel Sugars Ltd., The Dcit, No.93, Santhome High Road, Vs. Corporate Circle -1(2), R.A. Puram, Chennai. Chennai – 600 028. Pan: Aaaci 2702G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 02.11.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh: These Appeals By The Assessee Are Arising Out Of The Common Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4(I/C), Chennai In Ita Nos.434 & 433/16-17/Cit(A)-4/Ays 2005-06 & 2013-14 Dated 09.09.2019. The Assessments Were Framed U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter The ‘Act’) By The Acit, Company Circle Ii(3), Chennai For The Assessment Year 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)

…iles vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, wherein one of us is a party. This view of ours is also supported by the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Gujarat Alkalies Chemicals Limited reported in 395 ITR 247(Guj.), wherein it has been held that the deduction u/s.80IA was allowable to the for generation of power for captive consumption and that the rate of power generation at which the electricity board supplied power to its consumers rather than the rate at which the power generating companies supply its power to the electricity board was to be taken…

M/S. Coromandel Sugars Ltd., Chennai vs. DCIT, CC - 1 (2), Chennai

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 3390/CHNY/2019[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Nov 2022AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.: 3390 & 3391/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2005-06 & 2013 - 14 Coromandel Sugars Ltd., The Dcit, No.93, Santhome High Road, Vs. Corporate Circle -1(2), R.A. Puram, Chennai. Chennai – 600 028. Pan: Aaaci 2702G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 02.11.2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.11.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per Mahavir Singh: These Appeals By The Assessee Are Arising Out Of The Common Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-4(I/C), Chennai In Ita Nos.434 & 433/16-17/Cit(A)-4/Ays 2005-06 & 2013-14 Dated 09.09.2019. The Assessments Were Framed U/S.143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter The ‘Act’) By The Acit, Company Circle Ii(3), Chennai For The Assessment Year 2005-06

For Appellant: Shri R. Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, Addl.CIT
Section 143(3)

…iles vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, wherein one of us is a party. This view of ours is also supported by the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Gujarat Alkalies Chemicals Limited reported in 395 ITR 247(Guj.), wherein it has been held that the deduction u/s.80IA was allowable to the for generation of power for captive consumption and that the rate of power generation at which the electricity board supplied power to its consumers rather than the rate at which the power generating companies supply its power to the electricity board was to be taken…

DCIT-Ltu - 2, Mumbai vs. Ambuja Cements Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2958/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Nov 2022AY 2010-11
Section 143(3)Section 14A

…ity in computing the market value by taking into account the rate charged to a supplier: it should have been compared with the market value of power supplied to a consumer." 10. Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. [2017] 395 ITR 247/88 taxmann.com 722 also had occasion to examine such an issue. It referred to earlier order in case of Asstt. CIT v. Pragati Glass Works (P.) Ltd. [Tax Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, dated 30-1-2012] in which following observations were made:— "7. To our mind, Tribunal has committed no error. Assessing Officer and CIT (Appeals) while adopting Rs. 4.51…

Atul Limited, Ahmedabad vs. The ACIT., Range-1, Ahmedabad

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 1681/AHD/2011[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad23 Feb 2022AY 2005-06
For Appellant: Shri Bandish Soparkar, A.RFor Respondent: Shri Mohd Usman, CIT/DR
Section 250(6)Section 92C

…d. I.T.A No. 1681/Ahd/2011 A.Y. 2005-06 Page No 42 Atul Ltd. vs. ACIT 44. Before us, Ld. Counsel for the assessee contended that this issue was squarely covered by the decision of the Jurisdictional High Court in the Case of Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. 395 ITR 247, Alembic Ltd. in ITA No. 553 & 554 of 2017 and by the decision of the ITAT Ahmedabad Bench in the case of Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd. in ITA No. 805 & 2744/Ahd/2017. Copies of all the above orders was placed before us in compilation of orders at paper book page no. 10 to 27. 45. Ld. D.R. on the other hand supported the order of the revenue autho…

DCIT, Circle-5(1), Kolkata vs. Kesoram Industries Limited, Kolkata

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2012-13, 2014-

ITA 1864/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vp (Kz) & Hon’Ble Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

…on before Chhattisgarh High Court in case of CIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd. [2014] 42 taxmann.com 551/223 Taxman 234, in which the Court held and observed as under: …… 10. Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. [2017] 395 ITR 247/88 taxmann.com 722 also had occasion to examine such an issue. It referred to earlier order in case of Asstt. CIT v. Pragati Glass Works (P.) Ltd. [Tax Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, dated 30-1-2012] in which following observations were made:— ……. 11. Judgment of Calcutta High Court in case of CIT v. ITC Ltd. [2016] 236 Taxman 612/[2015] 64 taxmann.c…

DCIT, Circle - 5(1), Kolkata vs. M/S. Kesoram Industries Ltd., Kolkata

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2012-13, 2014-

ITA 1777/KOL/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vp (Kz) & Hon’Ble Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

…on before Chhattisgarh High Court in case of CIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd. [2014] 42 taxmann.com 551/223 Taxman 234, in which the Court held and observed as under: …… 10. Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. [2017] 395 ITR 247/88 taxmann.com 722 also had occasion to examine such an issue. It referred to earlier order in case of Asstt. CIT v. Pragati Glass Works (P.) Ltd. [Tax Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, dated 30-1-2012] in which following observations were made:— ……. 11. Judgment of Calcutta High Court in case of CIT v. ITC Ltd. [2016] 236 Taxman 612/[2015] 64 taxmann.c…

Kesoram Industries Ltd., Kolkata vs. D.C.I.T., Circle-5(1), Kolkata

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2012-13, 2014-

ITA 1197/KOL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vp (Kz) & Hon’Ble Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

…on before Chhattisgarh High Court in case of CIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd. [2014] 42 taxmann.com 551/223 Taxman 234, in which the Court held and observed as under: …… 10. Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. [2017] 395 ITR 247/88 taxmann.com 722 also had occasion to examine such an issue. It referred to earlier order in case of Asstt. CIT v. Pragati Glass Works (P.) Ltd. [Tax Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, dated 30-1-2012] in which following observations were made:— ……. 11. Judgment of Calcutta High Court in case of CIT v. ITC Ltd. [2016] 236 Taxman 612/[2015] 64 taxmann.c…

M/S. Kesoram Industries Ltd., Kolkata vs. DCIT, Circle - 5(1), Kolkata

In the result, all the appeals of the revenue for AYs 2012-13, 2014-

ITA 1650/KOL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata28 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri P. M. Jagtap, Vp (Kz) & Hon’Ble Shri A. T. Varkey]

Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 2Section 2(24)(x)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43

…on before Chhattisgarh High Court in case of CIT v. Godawari Power & Ispat Ltd. [2014] 42 taxmann.com 551/223 Taxman 234, in which the Court held and observed as under: …… 10. Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. [2017] 395 ITR 247/88 taxmann.com 722 also had occasion to examine such an issue. It referred to earlier order in case of Asstt. CIT v. Pragati Glass Works (P.) Ltd. [Tax Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, dated 30-1-2012] in which following observations were made:— ……. 11. Judgment of Calcutta High Court in case of CIT v. ITC Ltd. [2016] 236 Taxman 612/[2015] 64 taxmann.c…

Star Paper Mills Limited, Kolkata vs. DCIT, Cir. 4(2), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 127/KOL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata26 Oct 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri P. M .Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri A. T. Varkey, Jm]

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 80ISection 92B

…20 I.T.A. No.127/Kol/2021 Assessment Year: 2016-17 Star Paper Mills Limited [2014] 42 taxmann.com 551/223 Taxman 234, in which the Court held and observed as under: ……. 10. Gujarat High Court in case of Pr. CIT v. Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Ltd. [2017] 395 ITR 247/88 taxmann.com 722 also had occasion to examine such an issue. It referred to earlier order in case of Asstt. CIT v. Pragati Glass Works (P.) Ltd. [Tax Appeal No. 1646 of 2010, dated 30-1-2012] in which following observations were made:— ……. 11. Judgment of Calcutta High Court in case of CIT v. ITC Ltd. [2016] 236 Taxman 612/[2015] 64 taxmann.c…

Jayant Agro Organics Ltd., Mumbai vs. Addl. CIT (Tp) 2 (2), Mumbai

In the result, both the appeals are allowed

ITA 6073/MUM/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai14 Sept 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Saktijit Dey () & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman ()

Section 92C

…I.T.A. Nos.6073 &6074/Mum/2019 1 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “K” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) I.T.A. No.6073/Mum/2019 - Assessment year 2013-14 I.T.A. No.6074/Mum/2019 - Assessment year 2014-15 Jayant Agro Organics Limited vs Addl. CIT (TP)-2(2), Mumbai 701, Tower A, Peninsula Business Park, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai-400 013 PAN : AAACJ7581Q APPELLANT RESPONDENT Appellant by Shri Madhur Agarwal / Shri Siddhant Banwat, AR Respondent by Shri Brajendra Kumar (DR) Date of hearing 04-08-2021 Date of pronouncemen…

DCIT Corporate Circle 2(1), Chennai vs. The India Cements Ltd., Chennai

In the result, the cross objection filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 737/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos: 2145 & 2210/Chny/2017, Ita 737/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2008-09 & 2013-14 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. The India Cements Ltd., Income Tax, V. No.93, Coromandel Towers, Corporate Circle – 2(1), Santhome High Road, Chennai – 34. R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028. Pan: Aaact 1728P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No: 2038/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. The India Cements Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, V. No.93, Coromandal Towers, Corporate Circle – 2(1), Santhome High Road, Chennai – 34. R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028. Pan: Aaact 1728P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & Co No.: 76/Chny/2018 (In Ita No.737/Chny/2018) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. The India Cements Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, V. No.93, Coromandal Towers, Corporate Circle – 2(1), Santhome High Road, Chennai – 34. R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028. Pan: Aaact 1728P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 115VSection 14A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी दुगा" राव,"या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी. मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos: 2145 & 2210/CHNY/2017, ITA 737/CHNY/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2008-09 & 2013-14 The Deputy Commissioner of M/s. The India Cements Ltd., Income Tax, v. No.93, Coromandel Towers, Corporate Circle – 2(1), Santhome High Road, Chennai – 34. R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028. PAN: AAACT 1728P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर…

DCIT-2(1), Chennai vs. The India Cements Ltd, Chennai

In the result, the cross objection filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 2210/CHNY/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Aug 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos: 2145 & 2210/Chny/2017, Ita 737/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2008-09 & 2013-14 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. The India Cements Ltd., Income Tax, V. No.93, Coromandel Towers, Corporate Circle – 2(1), Santhome High Road, Chennai – 34. R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028. Pan: Aaact 1728P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No: 2038/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2009-10 M/S. The India Cements Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, V. No.93, Coromandal Towers, Corporate Circle – 2(1), Santhome High Road, Chennai – 34. R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028. Pan: Aaact 1728P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & Co No.: 76/Chny/2018 (In Ita No.737/Chny/2018) िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/S. The India Cements Ltd., The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, V. No.93, Coromandal Towers, Corporate Circle – 2(1), Santhome High Road, Chennai – 34. R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028. Pan: Aaact 1728P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vikram Vijayaraghavan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri G. Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 115VSection 14A

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘डी’ "यायपीठ, चे"ई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI "ी वी दुगा" राव,"या"यक सद"य एवं "ी जी. मंजुनाथ, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI V. DURGA RAO, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA Nos: 2145 & 2210/CHNY/2017, ITA 737/CHNY/2018 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13, 2008-09 & 2013-14 The Deputy Commissioner of M/s. The India Cements Ltd., Income Tax, v. No.93, Coromandel Towers, Corporate Circle – 2(1), Santhome High Road, Chennai – 34. R.A. Puram, Chennai – 600 028. PAN: AAACT 1728P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकर…