CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd.

103 Taxmann.com 57Supreme Court of India2019#254 most cited

What is CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd. authority for?

The Supreme Court holds that the issue of payment of excessive price on purchase of sugarcane by assesses is no longer res integra. The court elaborately dealt with this issue.

306

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,607 Indian tax judgments — from 2019 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd. · section 37(1) · sugarcane purchases · excessive price · business expenditure · approved Final Cane Price · FCP · res integra

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Tasgaon Taluka S.S.K. Ltd.

Dyaneshwar Ssk Ltd, Ahmednagar vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Ahmednagar

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed for statistical purposes in the manner aforesaid as the case may be

ITA 1090/PUN/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Pune25 Jul 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Vikas Awasthy, Jm आयकर अपील सं. / Ita No.1090/Pun/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Dyaneshwar Ssk Ltd., A/P Dyneshwar Nagar (Bhende), Taluka: Nevasa, Ahmednagar-414603. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant Pan : Aaaas4092H बनाम / V/S. Acit, Ahmednagar Circle, ……""यथ" / Respondent Ahmednagar. Assessee By : Shri Pratik Sandbhor Revenue By : Smt. Shabana Parveen सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.07.2019 घोषणा क" तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 25.07.2019 आदेश / Order Per D. Karunakara Rao, Am: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Cit(A)-2, Pune Dated 07.11.2016 For The Assessment Year 2013-14. 2. The Grounds Raised By The Assessee Are As Under :- “1. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case The Id. Cit(A) Has Erred In Not Allowing The Cane Purchase Price Actually Paid By The Appellant & By Holding That Excess Payment Over Frp Constitutes Distribution Of Profit. 2. On The Facts & In The Circumstances Of The Case & Without Prejudice To Ground No.1 The Cit(A) Has Erred In Deducting The Amount Of Harvesting & Transport From The Fair Remunerative Price For Arriving At The Excess Cane Purchase Price To Be Disallowed.

For Appellant: Shri Pratik SandbhorFor Respondent: Smt. Shabana Parveen
Section 35(1)(ii)Section 80P(2)(a)

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण “ए” "यायपीठ पुणे म" । IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “A” BENCH, PUNE "ी डी. क"णाकरा राव, लेखा सद"य एवं "ी िवकास अव"थी, "याियक सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JM आयकर अपील सं. / ITA No.1090/PUN/2017 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2013-14 Dyaneshwar SSK Ltd., A/p Dyneshwar Nagar (Bhende), Taluka: Nevasa, Ahmednagar-414603. .......अपीलाथ" / Appellant PAN : AAAAS4092H बनाम / V/s. ACIT, Ahmednagar Circle, ……""यथ" / Respondent Ahmednagar. Assessee by : Shri Pratik Sandbhor Revenue by : Smt. Shabana Parveen सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date of Hearing : 23.07.2019 घोष…