CIT v. Ranchhod Jivabhai Nakhava

21 Taxmann.com 159High Court2012#957 most cited

What is CIT v. Ranchhod Jivabhai Nakhava authority for?

When an assessee provides the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of lenders for cash credits under Section 68 by disclosing PAN, using account payee cheques, and furnishing confirmations, the initial burden is discharged. The onus then shifts to the Assessing Officer to verify the source of funds from the lenders' income tax records.

112

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Ranchhod Jivabhai Nakhava · Section 68 · cash credit · unexplained money · discharge of onus · identity of creditor · creditworthiness of creditor · genuineness of transaction · account payee cheque · PAN disclosure · Assessing Officer's duty · source of source

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Ranchhod Jivabhai Nakhava

The Jt. CIT, Sabarkantha Range, Himatnagar vs. Shree Ganesh Construction, Ahmedabad

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 394/AHD/2016[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad24 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Pramod M. Jagtap & Ms. Madhumita Royassessment Year : 2010-11 The Jt.Cit Shree Ganesh Construction S.K. Range Vs 511-B, Sarvodaya Commercial Centre Himatnagar Nr.Gpo Mirzapur Ahmedabad-380 001 Pan: Abffs 3302 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocate & Shri Parin Shah, Ar Revenue By : Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Sr.Dr सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 20/07/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 24/08/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per Pramod M. Jagtapthis Appeal Is Preferred By The Revenue Against The Order Of Ld. Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals)-10, Ahmedabad [Cit(A)] Dated 10Th December-2015. 2. In Ground No.1, The Revenue Has Challenged The Action Of The Ld.Cit(A) In Deleting The Addition Of Rs.2,88,85,846/- Made By The Assessing Officer U/S.68 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As “The Act”) On Account Of Unsecured Loans By Treating The Same As Unexplained Cash Credit. Jt.Cit Vs. Shree Ganesh Construction Asst.Year 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocate &For Respondent: Shri Shramdeep Sinha, Sr.DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 68

…आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ, अहमदाबाद अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ अहमदाबाद अहमदाबाद । अहमदाबाद IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “ A ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD ] ] BEFORE SHRI PRAMOD M. JAGTAP, VICE PRESIDENT AND Ms. MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Year : 2010-11 The Jt.CIT Shree Ganesh Construction S.K. Range Vs 511-B, Sarvodaya Commercial Centre Himatnagar Nr.GPO Mirzapur Ahmedabad-380 001 PAN: ABFFS 3302 P अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Assessee by : Shri S.N. Soparkar, Sr.Advocate & Shri Parin Shah, AR…

ACIT, Circle-3(2), Ahmedabad vs. M/S. Kraft Laminate, Ahmedabad

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

ITA 1841/AHD/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad16 Mar 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice- & Shri T.R. Senthil Kumarassessment Years : 2015-16 Assistant Commissioner Of M/S. Kraft Laminate, Income-Tax, Vs C/O. Laxmi Timber, Nr. Circle 3(2), Ahmedabad Mahalaxmi Textile Mill, Opp. Rajbai Patel Timber Market, Narol Naroda Highway, Narol, Ahmedabad-382405 Pan : Aamfk 8120 F अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Revenue By : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr. Dr Assessee By : Shri Manish J. Shah, Advocate सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 24/02/2022 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement: 16/03/2022 आदेश/O R D E R Per P.M. Jagtap, Vice-:

For Appellant: Shri Manish J. Shah, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri V.K. Singh, Sr. DR
Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, अहमदाबाद "यायपीठ ‘‘सी’’ अहमदाबाद। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, AHMEDABAD (through web-based video conferencing platform) ] ] BEFORE SHRI P.M. JAGTAP, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI T.R. SENTHIL KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER Assessment Years : 2015-16 Assistant Commissioner of M/s. Kraft Laminate, Income-tax, Vs C/o. Laxmi Timber, Nr. Circle 3(2), Ahmedabad Mahalaxmi Textile Mill, Opp. Rajbai Patel Timber Market, Narol Naroda Highway, Narol, Ahmedabad-382405 PAN : AAMFK 8120 F अपीलाथ"/ (Appellant) "" यथ"/ (Respondent) Revenue by : Shri V.K. Singh, Sr. DR Assessee by : Shri Manish J. Shah,…

Sejal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd., Surat vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(2), Surat

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 435/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat28 Feb 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shripawan Singh, Jm &Dr. A.L.Saini, Am आयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.435/Ahd/2017 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Court Hearing) Sejal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd, Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(2), V Ug-4/5 Rangila Park, Ghod Dod Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, Majura Gate, S. Road, Surat-395007 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No.: Aaqcs 8686 P (Appellant ) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Rasesh Shah, CAFor Respondent: Shri H.P. Meena– CIT-DR
Section 131Section 131(1)(d)Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, SURAT BENCH, SURAT BEFORE SHRIPAWAN SINGH, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM आयकरअपीलसं./ITA No.435/AHD/2017 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: (2012-13) (Virtual Court Hearing) Sejal Jewellers Pvt. Ltd, Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(2), V UG-4/5 Rangila Park, Ghod Dod Surat, Aaykar Bhavan, Majura Gate, s. Road, Surat-395007 Surat "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AAQCS 8686 P (Appellant ) (Respondent) Assessee by :Shri Rasesh Shah, CA Respondent by :Shri H.P. Meena– CIT-DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date of Hearing : 21/01/2022 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 28/02/2022 आदेश / O R D E R PER DR…