CIT v. Ranchhod Jivabhai Nakhava

21 Taxmann.com 159High Court2012#957 most cited

What is CIT v. Ranchhod Jivabhai Nakhava authority for?

When an assessee provides the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of lenders for cash credits under Section 68 by disclosing PAN, using account payee cheques, and furnishing confirmations, the initial burden is discharged. The onus then shifts to the Assessing Officer to verify the source of funds from the lenders' income tax records.

112

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Ranchhod Jivabhai Nakhava · Section 68 · cash credit · unexplained money · discharge of onus · identity of creditor · creditworthiness of creditor · genuineness of transaction · account payee cheque · PAN disclosure · Assessing Officer's duty · source of source

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Ranchhod Jivabhai Nakhava

Anuradha Anilkumar Agarwal, Surat vs. The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Surat

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2911/AHD/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat14 Nov 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A. No.2911/Ahd/2016/Srt िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2012-13 Anuradha Anilkumar Agarwal, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of G-1315, Surat Textile Market, Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Ring Road, Surat – 395 002. Surat – 395 001. [Pan: Aarpa 7732 J] अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Shri Mehul R. Shah - Ca िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee By राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue By Shri Vinod Kumar – Sr.Dr 23.10.2018 सुनवाई क" तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 14.11.2018 उ"ोषणा क" तारीख/Pronouncement On आदेश /O R D E R Per O. P. Meena, Accoutant Member: 1. This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Surat(In Short “The Cit (A)”) Dated 19.09.2016 Pertaining To Assessment Year 2012-13 Which In Turn Has Arisen From The Order Passed By The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Surat(In Short “The Ao”) Dated 30.03.2015 Under Section 143(3) Of Income Tax Act,1961 (In Short ‘The Act’).

Section 131Section 143(3)Section 68

…Anuradha Anilkumar Agarwal Vs. DCIT, Circle-1(2), Surat /ITA No.2911/Ahd/2016/SRT/AY.2012-13 Page 1 of 7 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,सुरत "यायपीठ, सुरत IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT "ी सी.एम.गग", "याियक सद"य तथा "ी ओ.पी.मीना, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI C.M.GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P.MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.सं./I.T.A. No.2911/AHD/2016/SRT िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year : 2012-13 Anuradha Anilkumar Agarwal, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of G-1315, Surat Textile Market, Income Tax, Circle-1(2), Ring Road, Surat – 395 002. Surat – 395 001. [PAN: AARPA 7732 J] अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respon…

M/S. Tirupati Energy Solution Pvt. Ltd., Surat vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2(1)(4), Surat

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 573/AHD/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Surat16 Oct 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri C.M.Garg & Shri O.P.Meenaआ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.573/Ahd/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/A.Y.:2012-13 M/S. Tirupati Energy Solution Vs. Income Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd. , 1/B Ratnadham Ward- 2(1)(4) Surat Vinay Apartment , Ratnadham Sankhul Piplod Surat Pan: Aacct 7044 G अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 68

…Tirupati Energy Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. ITO 2(1) (4) Surat/I.T.A. No.573/Ahd/2017/A.Y.:12-13 Page 1 of 31 आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण,सुरत "यायपीठ, सुरत IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SURAT BENCH, SURAT "ी सी.एम.गग", "याियक सद"य तथा "ी ओ.पी.मीना, लेखा सद"य के सम" BEFORE SHRI C.M.GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P.MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आ.अ.सं./I.T.A No.573/Ahd/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/A.Y.:2012-13 M/s. Tirupati Energy Solution Vs. Income Tax Officer, Pvt. Ltd. , 1/B Ratnadham Ward- 2(1)(4) Surat Vinay Apartment , Ratnadham Sankhul Piplod Surat PAN: AACCT 7044 G अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent िनधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee…

Citibuilders & Developers, Navi Mumbai vs. ITO 22(3)(1), Navi Mumbai

In the result, appeal of the Assessee is Allowed

ITA 1495/MUM/2011[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai23 Mar 2016AY 1996-97

Bench: Shri D. Karunakara Rao, Am & Shri Amarjit Singh, Jm आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1495/Mum/11 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 1996-97) Citi Builders & Developers Income Tax Officer Ward बनाम/ 211, Thaper Complex, 22(3)(1) Vs. 2Nd Floor, Plot No.51, Tower 6, 3Rd Floor, Cbd Belapur, Vashi Rly. Station, Navi Mumbai - 400614 Navi Mumbai - 400703 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. : Aacfc7080N

For Appellant: Shri Dharmesh ShahFor Respondent: Shri Akhilendra P. Yadav
Section 133(6)Section 68

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण,“सी” "यायपीठ, मुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “C” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI D. KARUNAKARA RAO, AM AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JM आयकर अपील सं/ I.T.A. No.1495/Mum/11 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 1996-97) Citi Builders & Developers Income Tax Officer Ward बनाम/ 211, Thaper Complex, 22(3)(1) Vs. 2nd Floor, Plot No.51, Tower 6, 3rd Floor, CBD Belapur, Vashi Rly. Station, Navi Mumbai - 400614 Navi Mumbai - 400703 "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AACFC7080N .. (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) Assessee by: Shri Dharmesh Shah Department by: Shri Akhilendra P. Yadav सुनवाई क…