CIT v. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.

291 ITR 482Supreme Court of India2007#588 most cited

What is CIT v. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd. authority for?

The Supreme Court held that the 'project completion method' and the 'percentage of completion method' are recognized accounting methods for ascertaining profit for contracts. The case affirms these methods in the context of contract accounts.

166

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,005 Indian tax judgments — from 2011 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd · completed contract method · percentage of completion method · contract accounts · profit ascertainment · accounting methods · 291 ITR 482 · 161 Taxmann 191 · SC

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.

J.M. Voith Se & Co. Kg (Earlier Voith Paper Gmbh & Co. Kg), New Delhi vs. DCIT, Circle- 3(1)(1), International Taxation, New Delhi

In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 4862/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Apr 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Vice- & Shri Saktijit Dey, Vice-Assessment Year: 2015-16 J.M. Voith Se & Co. Kg Versus Dcit, Circle 3(1)(1), (Earlier Voith Paper Gmbh & Co. International Taxation, Kg), C/O Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi. Cas, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi. Pan: Aadcv4876D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Sh. Rajan Bhatia, Adv. Sh. Ankit Nanda & Sh. Anuj Mathur, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Dr & Sh. Vivek Vardhan, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing : 19.04.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 23.04.2024 Order

For Appellant: Sh. Rajan Bhatia, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR and Sh. Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 9(1)(i)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘D’ NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE-PRESIDENT AND SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY, VICE-PRESIDENT Assessment Year: 2015-16 J.M. Voith SE & Co. KG Versus DCIT, Circle 3(1)(1), (Earlier Voith Paper GmbH & Co. International Taxation, KG), C/o Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi. CAs, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi. PAN: AADCV4876D (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by : Sh. Rajan Bhatia, Adv. Sh. Ankit Nanda and Sh. Anuj Mathur, CA Revenue by : Sh. Sanjay Kumar, Sr. DR and Sh. Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR Date of hearing : 19.04.2024 Date of pronouncement: 23.04.2024 ORDER…

First Abu Dhabi Bank Pjsc, Mumbai vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-Circle 2(3)(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 3279/MUM/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Feb 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Amarjit Singhfirst Abu Dhabi Bank Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Pjsc, Unit No.1101 & Income-Tax (It), Circle 1201 Platina Building, C- 2(3)(1), Room No. 1614, 59, G Block, Bandra Kurla 16Th Floor, Air India Complex, Bandra East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400051 Mumbai – 400021 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No:Aaecn2845F Appellant .. Respondent Appellant By : Madhur Agarwal Respondent By : Anil Sant Date Of Hearing 07.02.2024 Date Of Pronouncement 27.02.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amarjit Singh (Am): This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, International Taxation, Circle 2(3)(1), Mumbai-2, Dated 20.07.2023 For A.Y. 2020-21. The Assessee Has Raised The Following Grounds Before Us: 1. Ground No. 1: The Learned Ao Has, On The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case & In Law, Erred In Initiating & Completing Assessment Proceedings Under Section 143(3) Of The Act Without Issuing A Valid Notice Under Section 143(2) Of The Act Ie, The Notice Under Section 143(2) Of The Act Dated 29 June 2021 For Initiating Assessment Was Issued By National Faceless Assessment Centre (Nafac) Instead Of Being Issued By The Learned Ao (I.E Jurisdictional Assessing Officer) 2. Ground No. 2:

For Appellant: Madhur AgarwalFor Respondent: Anil Sant
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153Section 155(18)Section 270ASection 80G

…P a g e | 1 First Abu Dhabi Bank Vs. DCIT(IT) Circle 2(3)(1) IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “I” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER First Abu Dhabi Bank Vs. Deputy Commissioner of PJSC, Unit No.1101 and Income-tax (IT), Circle 1201 Platina Building, C- 2(3)(1), Room No. 1614, 59, G Block, Bandra Kurla 16th Floor, Air India Complex, Bandra East, Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400051 Mumbai – 400021 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No:AAECN2845F Appellant .. Respondent Appellant by : Madhur Agarwal Respondent by : Anil Sant Date of Hearing 07…