UK GRID SOLUTIONS LIMITED ,UNITED KINGDOM vs. DCIT CIRCLE INTL. TAXATION 3(1)(1), NEW DELHI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that interest under Section 234B of the Act is not chargeable when tax has been deducted at source by the buyer. The chargeability of interest under Section 234D is consequential. For AY 2020-21, the AO was directed to verify the chargeability of interest under Section 234A.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a UK-based company, received payments from Indian customers for designing, manufacturing, and supplying power transmission equipment. The Assessing Officer (AO) treated a composite contract as a single unit, despite the assessee's claim of being only an offshore supplier. The AO also levied interest under Section 234B and 234D of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether interest under Section 234B is leviable when tax is deducted at source, and the applicability of other interest provisions for advance tax payments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(30)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Ishikawajima Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. v. DIT394 citing288 ITR 408 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. De Beers India Minerals (P.) Ltd.371 citing346 ITR 467 · 2012 · HC
- DIT v. Morgan Stanley & Co.360 citing292 ITR 416 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- DIT v. Nokia Networks OY276 citing358 ITR 259 · 2013 · HC
- DIT v. Ericsson A.B256 citing343 ITR 470 · 2012 · HC
- DIT v. Guy Carpenter & Co Ltd.171 citing346 ITR 504 · 2012 · HC
- CIT v. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.166 citing291 ITR 482 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
- DIT v. Morgan Stanley Co. Inc.162 citing399 ITR 34 · 2017 · SC
- CIT v. R.D. Aggarwal and Co.156 citing56 ITR 20 · 1965 · SC · Read judgment
- Raymond Ltd. v. Dy. CIT154 citing86 ITD 791 · 2003 · ITAT
- Steria (India) Ltd. v. CIT83 citing194 ITD 729 · 2016 · ITAT
- ESPN Star Sports Mauritius S.N.C. ET Compagnie v. Union of India71 citing388 ITR 383 · 2016 · HC
- National Petroleum Construction Company v. DIT69 citing101 TTJ 56 · 2016 · ITAT
- Linde AG, Linde Engineering Division v. DDIT55 citing365 ITR 1 · 2014 · HC
- Trib.) 4) TVM Limited v. Commissioner of Income-tax47 citing237 ITR 230 · 1999
- DIT vs Morgan Stanley & Co Inc: 292 ITR 416 (SC), DIT v. Morgan Stanley & Co Inc.29 citing25 ITR 27 · 1954 · SC
- (International Taxation) v. Samsung Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.29 citing426 ITR 1 · 2020 · SC
- Net App B.V v. DDIT25 citing78 Taxmann.com 97 · 2017 · HC
- CIT v. Hindustan Shipyard Ltd.21 citing109 ITR 158 · 1977 · HC
- Geo Consultants v. DIT21 citing323 ITR 277 · 2010
- Ishikawajma-Harima Heavy Industries Ltd. v. DIT21 citing237 CTR 438 · 2011 · HC
- 416 (SC), DIT vs Morgan Stanley & Co Inc: 292 ITR 416 (SC), The Anglo French Textile Co Ltd. v. CIT19 citing41 ITR 781 · HC
- SC), The Anglo French Textile Co Ltd vs CIT: 25 ITR 27 (SC), Annamalais Timber Trust and Co. v. CIT18 citing31 Taxmann 444 · HC
- DDIT v. Mitsui & Co Ltd.14 citing118 Taxmann.com 379 · 2020 · HC
- 56 ITR 20 (SC), CIT v. Hindustan Shipyard Ltd.12 citing164 ITR 401 · 1987 · HC
- IT Solution: 399 ITR 34 (SC), DIT v. Samsung Heavy Industries Co Ltd.12 citing399 ITR 505 · 2017 · HC
- 237 CTR 438 (Del), DIT v. Nokia Networks OY11 citing182 ITD 479 · 2020 · ITAT
- Linde AG, Linde Engineering Division v. DDIT10 citing242 Taxmann 371 · 2016 · SC
- 10 citing
- 190 Taxmann 3149 citing190 Taxmann 314
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH “D”: NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI C. N. PRASAD & SHRI M. BALAGANESH
PER M. BALAGANESH, A. M.:
The appeals in ITA Nos. 2239,884, 885 & 2240/Del/2023 for AYs 2015-16, 2016-17, 2017-18 & 2020-21, arise out of the orders of the ld AO, DCIT, Circle International Tax-3(1)(1), New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as „ AO‟, in short] dated 29.08.2023 for AY 2015-16, 30.0
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- Ge Hydro France, New Delhi vs DCIT, Circle-1(3)(1), International…Delhi13 Mar 2024Partly Allowed
The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding the disallowance of duty drawback written off and held that interest under Section 234B is not chargeable when tax is deducted at source by the buyer. Interest under Section 234C...
- Uk Grid Solutions Limited, United Kingdom vs DCIT Circle Intl. Taxation 3(1)(1), New…Delhi13 Mar 2024Partly Allowed
The Tribunal held that interest under Section 234B of the Act is not chargeable when tax has been deducted at source by the buyer. The chargeability of interest under Section 234D is consequential. For AY 2020-21, the AO...
- Uk Grid Solution Ltd, United Kingdom vs DCIT, Circle-3(1)(1), International…Delhi17 Apr 2023Allowed
The Tribunal held that the services provided by the assessee did not satisfy the 'make available' clause of the India-UK DTAA, and therefore, the global operation fee received was not taxable as Fees for Technical Servic...
- Uk Grid Solution Ltd, United Kingdom vs DCIT, Circle-3(1)(1), International…Delhi12 Apr 2023Allowed
The Tribunal held that the global operation fees received by the assessee did not satisfy the 'make available' clause of the India-UK DTAA and were therefore not taxable as Fees for Technical Services (FTS). The addition...
- M/S. Voith Paper Gmbh, New Delhi vs DDIT, New DelhiDelhi21 Feb 2020Dismissed
The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, upholding the AO's order. It found no error in the AO's decision regarding the taxability of income in India and the charging of interest under Section 234B, considering the ...
More judgments on Section 234B
- Vikas Ashokkumar Masand, Ahmedabad vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 3130/AHD/2026[A.Y. 2017-18]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shalin Jayantbhai Desai, Vadodara vs ACIT, Circle-4(2), Vadodara Present…ITA 2569/AHD/2026[2010-11]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2010-11
- Sarvjeet Singh Through Legal Heir Manjit… vs ITO Ward 1(1), AlwarITA 355/JPR/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Cornerstone Ondemand International Limited… vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 2128/MUM/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- S. Nithyananda vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Venkadeswara Grill Works vs. The Joint Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026
- Mufti Clothing And Co vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 16 Oct 2026