Zakaulla Siddqui, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 47, Mumbai
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2011-12 is partly allowed whereas the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed
ITA 302/MUM/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai26 Feb 2018AY 2011-12
Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2006-07 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 Mr. Zakaullah Siddiqui Asst. Commissioner Of A-Wing, 604 A, Simla Income-Tax, Central Vs. House, Napean Sea Road, Circle-47, Mumbai-400036. Mumbai. Pan No. Aakps6026J Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2011-12 A.C.I.T.-Cc-8(4) Mr. Zakaullah Siddiqui 6Th Floor, Room No. 658, A-Wing, 604 A, Simla Vs. Aayakarbhavan, M.K. House, Napean Sea Road, Road, Mumbai-400036. Mumbai-400020 Pan No. Aakps6026J Appellant Respondent Assesseeby : Mr. Ajay R. Singh, Ar Revenue By : Mr. A.K. Jha, Cit-Dr Date Of Hearing : 06/12/2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 26/02/2018
For Appellant: Mr. Ajay R. Singh, ARFor Respondent: Mr. A.K. Jha, CIT-DR
Section 132Section 132(1)Section 143(3)Section 153Section 153A
…proceedings also. Therefore, I have no other option but a confirm this amount of Rs.29,50,000/- and delete the balance Rs.15,50,000/-.” 2.3 Before us, the Ld. counsel of the assessee relies on the decision in CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (2015) 374 ITR 645 (Bom) and submits that since the addition made by the AO in the assessment completed u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 153A is not based on seized material or any incriminating material found during the course of search action, the same may be deleted. Zakaulla Siddiqui 2.4 On the other hand, the Ld. DR relies on the order passed by the Ld. CIT(A). 2.5 We have…