POONAWALLA INVESTMENTS & INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that disallowance under Section 14A in a non-abated assessment under Section 153C is not sustainable without incriminating material. Other grounds related to gratuity scheme contributions were dismissed, while disallowance of Portfolio Management Services (PMS) fees was allowed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, engaged in stud farm activities, faced a search and seizure action. Assessments were completed under Section 153C read with Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. The appeals dealt with disallowances under Section 14A and other expenses.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A can be made in a non-abated assessment under Section 153C without incriminating material. The allowability of expenses like gratuity contributions and PMS fees were also examined.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Malabar Industrial Co. Ltd. v. CIT2,943 citing243 ITR 83 · 2000 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd.1,823 citing58 Taxmann.com 78 · 2015 · HC
- All Cargo Global Logistics Ltd. v. DCIT907 citing147 TTJ 513 · 2012 · ITAT
- Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Company Ltd. v. DCIT683 citing394 ITR 448 · 2017 · SC · Read judgment
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
आदेश आदेश आदेश
PER D. KA
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Md. Akhtar Ansari, Proprietor Of M/S Indian Associates vs. State Of Jharkhand, Through Commissioner Of State Tax, Commercial Tax Dept.Jharkhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Amarjothi Granites (INDIA) PVT. LTD., Berhampur, Ganjam vs. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mishka Steels LLP And Anr. vs. The Superintendent Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Cx, Range-Ii, Behala Div. And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Gujarat Co-Operative Milk Marketing Federation Limited vs. Union Of INDIAGujarat · 14 Oct 2026
- Ramesh K Devadiga vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co Operative Housing Society LTDBombay · 14 Oct 2026