CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd.

374 ITR 645High Court2015#14 most cited

What is CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd. authority for?

In Section 153A proceedings, the scope of assessment extends to abated proceedings, enabling an assessee to raise fresh legal claims that could have been made in regular assessment proceedings.

1,823

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 367,181 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2026.

Also referred to as

Continental Warehousing Corporation · Section 153A · scope of 153A assessment · abated proceedings · fresh claims in search assessment · assessee's claims 153A · Section 132 · assessment procedure · search and seizure assessment

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd.

Rosy Blue Securities P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 46, Mumbai

In the result, these appeals by the assessee stand allowed

ITA 1201/MUM/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai01 Mar 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya, Am & Shri Ram Lal Negi, Jm आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.1201 & 1220/Mum/2016 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2007-08 & 2008-09) M/S. Rosy Blue Securities Pvt. Ltd. Asst.Cit-46, बनाम/ 154-C, Mittal Court, Aaykar Bhavan, M. K. Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai-400 021 Mumbai-400 020 Vs. "थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No. Aaacr 4082 Q (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri Nitesh Josh ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ram Tiwari

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh JoshFor Respondent: Shri Ram Tiwari
Section 143(3)Section 153A

…3A which is an assessment pursuant to search and seizure action, no seized material has been referred to for making of this addition. The Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Continental Warehousing Corporation (Nhava Sheva) Ltd. [2015] 374 ITR 645 (Bom) has expounded that in case of an assessment u/s. 153A pursuant to search and seizure action where assessment has already been done earlier, no addition can be made dehorse any seized material. The ld. Departmental Representative could not point out any incriminating material found in search and fairly agreed that the addition in the prese…