CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro

88 Taxmann.com 178Supreme Court of India2017#1191 most cited

What is CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro authority for?

Subsidies granted under a Government Industrial Scheme to accelerate industrial development and generate employment are capital in nature, determined by the 'purpose test', regardless of the timing, source, or form of the subsidy.

95

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2018 to 2025.

Also referred to as

CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro · 400 ITR 27 · subsidy · capital receipt · revenue receipt · purpose test · Government Industrial Scheme · industrial development · employment generation · section 41(1)(a) · section 43(1)

Also reported as

252 Taxmann 360400 ITR 27

Sections most often in play

Section 115JBSection 14ASection 37(1)Section 43(1)Section 139(5)Section 153ASection 132Section 271(1)(c)

Issues it is cited on

section 41(1)(a)bright line testsection 43(1)amp expenditurecomparable uncontrolled price methodsection 92(1)cost plus methodfunctional analysissection 80jjasection 80jjaasection 92c(3)section 38

Judgments citing CIT v. Chaphalkar Bro

Srf Ltd., Gurgaon vs. Addl CIT, New Delhi

In the result, this ground of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 774/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi23 Feb 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. Anil Chaturvedi & Sh. Yogesh Kumar Ussrf Limited Vs. Acit Unitech Crest, Greenwood Range – 9, City Block – C, Sector – 45, Ltu, New Delhi Gurgaon – 122 003 Pan No. Aaacs 0206 P (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Pradeep Dinodia, Shri R. K. Kapoor C.A. Shri Ravi Kumar Revenue By Shri Mahesh Shah, Cit (Dr) Shri Rajesh Kumar, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing: 10/01/2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 23/02/2023 Order Per Anil Chaturvedi, Am: The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Directed Against The Order Dated 27.09.2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-44, New Delhi [For Short, Cit(A)] Under Section 143(3) R.W.S 144C Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [For Short, 'The Act'] For Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case As Culled Out From The Material On Record Are As Under:-

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14ASection 92C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘I’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. YOGESH KUMAR US, JUDICIAL MEMBER SRF Limited Vs. ACIT Unitech Crest, Greenwood Range – 9, City Block – C, Sector – 45, LTU, New Delhi Gurgaon – 122 003 PAN No. AAACS 0206 P (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by Shri Pradeep Dinodia, Shri R. K. Kapoor C.A. Shri Ravi Kumar Revenue by Shri Mahesh Shah, CIT (DR) Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT (DR) Date of hearing: 10/01/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 23/02/2023 ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM: The present appeal is filed by the assessee directed against the order…

Addl CIT 3(1), Mumbai vs. Bajaj Hindustan Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the appeal of the assesse is partly allowed

ITA 5208/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Jan 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amarjit Singhacit-3(1)(1) Vs. M/S Bajaj Hindustan Room No. 607, 6 Th Floor, Sugar Ltd. Aayakar Bhavan, ( Ea R L I E R K N O W N A S M / S B A J A J H I N D U S T A N L T D ) Bajaj Bhavan, 2 Nd Floor, M.K. Road, Jamanalal Bajaj, Marg- Mumbai – 400 020 226, Nariman Point Mumbai 400021 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaacb4351J Appellant .. Respondent M/S Bajaj Hindustan Vs. Acit-3(1)(1) Sugar Ltd. Room No. 607, 6 Th Floor, ( Ea R L I E R K N O W N A S M / S B A J A J H I N D U S T A N L T D ) Aayakar Bhavan, Bajaj Bhavan, 2 Nd Floor, M.K. Road, Jamanalal Bajaj, Marg- Mumbai – 400 020 226, Nariman Point Mumbai 400021 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaacb4351J Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Percy Pardiwala &For Respondent: Mahesh Akhade
Section 115JSection 143(3)

…P a g e | 1 ACIT-3(1)(1) M/s Bajaj Hindustan Sugar Ltd. ITA Nos.5208 & 5058/Mum/2012 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACIT-3(1)(1) Vs. M/s Bajaj Hindustan Room No. 607, 6 th Floor, Sugar Ltd. Aayakar Bhavan, ( Ea r l i e r k n o w n a s M / s B a j a j H i n d u s t a n L t d ) Bajaj Bhavan, 2 nd Floor, M.K. Road, Jamanalal Bajaj, Marg- Mumbai – 400 020 226, Nariman Point Mumbai 400021 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AAACB4351J Appellant .. Respondent M/s Bajaj Hindustan Vs. ACIT-3(1)(1) Sugar Ltd.…

Bajaj Hindustan Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT 3(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed and the appeal of the assesse is partly allowed

ITA 5058/MUM/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai12 Jan 2023AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Amarjit Singhacit-3(1)(1) Vs. M/S Bajaj Hindustan Room No. 607, 6 Th Floor, Sugar Ltd. Aayakar Bhavan, ( Ea R L I E R K N O W N A S M / S B A J A J H I N D U S T A N L T D ) Bajaj Bhavan, 2 Nd Floor, M.K. Road, Jamanalal Bajaj, Marg- Mumbai – 400 020 226, Nariman Point Mumbai 400021 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaacb4351J Appellant .. Respondent M/S Bajaj Hindustan Vs. Acit-3(1)(1) Sugar Ltd. Room No. 607, 6 Th Floor, ( Ea R L I E R K N O W N A S M / S B A J A J H I N D U S T A N L T D ) Aayakar Bhavan, Bajaj Bhavan, 2 Nd Floor, M.K. Road, Jamanalal Bajaj, Marg- Mumbai – 400 020 226, Nariman Point Mumbai 400021 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./Pan/Gir No: Aaacb4351J Appellant .. Respondent

For Appellant: Percy Pardiwala &For Respondent: Mahesh Akhade
Section 115JSection 143(3)

…P a g e | 1 ACIT-3(1)(1) M/s Bajaj Hindustan Sugar Ltd. ITA Nos.5208 & 5058/Mum/2012 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “B” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ACIT-3(1)(1) Vs. M/s Bajaj Hindustan Room No. 607, 6 th Floor, Sugar Ltd. Aayakar Bhavan, ( Ea r l i e r k n o w n a s M / s B a j a j H i n d u s t a n L t d ) Bajaj Bhavan, 2 nd Floor, M.K. Road, Jamanalal Bajaj, Marg- Mumbai – 400 020 226, Nariman Point Mumbai 400021 स्थायी लेखा सं./जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No: AAACB4351J Appellant .. Respondent M/s Bajaj Hindustan Vs. ACIT-3(1)(1) Sugar Ltd.…

Greenlam Industries Limited, Tinsukia vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-Tinsukia, Tinsukia

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed as per the terms indicated above

ITA 402/GTY/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Guwahati19 Dec 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Sri Rajpal Yadav(Kz) & Dr. Manish Borad

Section 115JSection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 244ASection 25Section 250Section 251(1)(a)Section 31(3)(a)

…आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण गुवाहाटी 'डीबी' पीठ, कोलकाता में IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL GUWAHATI ‘DB’ BENCH AT KOLKATA [वर्ुअल कोटु] [Virtual Court] श्री राजपाल यादव, उपाध्यक्ष (कोलकाता क्षेत्र) एवं डॉ. मनीष बोरड, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष Before SRI RAJPAL YADAV, VICE PRESIDENT (KZ) & DR. MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. No.: 402/Gau/2019 Assessment Year: 2015-16 Greenlam Industries Limited...................................Appellant [PAN: AAFCG 2966 D] Vs. ACIT, Circle-Tinsukia, Assam…………....................Respondent Appearances by: Sh. Ashok Tulsyan, Adv., appeared on behalf of the Assessee. Sh. N.T. Sherpa,…

DCIT-Ltu - 2, Mumbai vs. Ambuja Cements Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2958/MUM/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Nov 2022AY 2010-11
Section 143(3)Section 14A

…ITA Nos. 1889 and 1241/Mum/2018, 2384, 2958, 3475 and 3843/Mum/2019 Assessment years: 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 Page 1 of 99 THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI K BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and Sandeep S Karhail (Judicial Member)] ITA No.2384 and 3475/Mum/2019 and 1241/Mum/2018 Assessment years: 2010-11, 2011-12 and 2012-13 Ambuja Cement Limited .…………………………Appellant (formerly known as Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd.) Elegant Business Park, MIDC Cross Road B, Andheri (E) Mumbai 400 059 [PAN: AAACG0569P] Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Large Tax Payer Unit, Mumbai ……………...………

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT RG 2(2)(2), Mumbai

In the result, appeal by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 7287/MUM/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Pramod Kumar & Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail

For Appellant: Shri H.P. MahajaniFor Respondent: Smt. Mahita Nair
Section 143(3)Section 144C(13)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 92C

…the purpose of determining the taxability of receipt of the said subsidy. We also find that this issue has been addressed in the following decisions of Hon‘ble Supreme Court in favour of the assessee as under:- (a) Chaphalkar Brothers, case reported in (2017) 88 Taxmann.com 178 (SC); (b) Shree Balaji Alloys and others, case reported in (2017) 80 Taxmann.com 239 (SC). 10.5. Respectfully following the said decision, we hold that the subsidy in the sum of Rs.45,36,95,084/- is to be treated as capital receipt. Accordingly, the concise ground No.8 raised by the assessee is allowed.‖ 37. The learned DR could not show…

DCIT (Ltu) 1, Mumbai vs. Ambuja Cements Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is thus dismissed

ITA 3307/MUM/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Nov 2022AY 2008-09
Section 115JSection 14Section 143(3)Section 14A

…ITA Nos.2968/Mum/2015 & 1665/Mum/2019 ITA Nos. 3307/Mum/2015 & 2428/Mum/2019 Assessment years: 2008-09 and 2009-10 Page 1 of 51 THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI K BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and Sandeep S Karhail (Judicial Member)] ITA Nos.2968/Mum/2015 and 1665/Mum/2019 Assessment years: 2008-09 and 2009-10 Ambuja Cement Limited .…………………………Appellant (formerly known as Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd.) Elegant Business Park, MIDC Cross Road B, Andheri (E) Mumbai 400 059 [PAN: AAACG0569P] Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Large Tax Payer Unit, Mumbai ……………...…………Respondent ITA…

Asst CIT Ltu, Mumbai vs. Ambuja Cements Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 6405/MUM/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Nov 2022AY 2007-08
Section 143(3)Section 28

…ITA Nos. 6375 and 6405/Mum/2013 CO No. 166/Mum/2015 Assessment year: 2007-08 Page 1 of 42 THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI K BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and Sandeep S Karhail (Judicial Member)] Assessment year: 2007-08 Ambuja Cement Limited .…………………………Appellant (formerly Known as Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd.) Elegant Business Park, MIDC Cross Road B, Andheri (E) Mumbai 400 059 [PAN: AAACG0569P] Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Large Tax Payer Unit, Mumbai ……………...…………Respondent CO No. 166/Mum/2015 In ITA No. 6375/Mum/2013 Assessment year: 2007-08 Assistant Commissioner of…

Ambuja Cements Ltd ( Formerly Known As Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd), Mumbai vs. Addl CIT 3(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is thus dismissed

ITA 2428/MUM/2013[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai07 Nov 2022AY 2006-07
Section 115JSection 14Section 143(3)Section 14A

…ITA Nos.2968/Mum/2015 & 1665/Mum/2019 ITA Nos. 3307/Mum/2015 & 2428/Mum/2019 Assessment years: 2008-09 and 2009-10 Page 1 of 51 THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI K BENCH, MUMBAI [Coram: Pramod Kumar (Vice President), and Sandeep S Karhail (Judicial Member)] ITA Nos.2968/Mum/2015 and 1665/Mum/2019 Assessment years: 2008-09 and 2009-10 Ambuja Cement Limited .…………………………Appellant (formerly known as Gujarat Ambuja Cements Ltd.) Elegant Business Park, MIDC Cross Road B, Andheri (E) Mumbai 400 059 [PAN: AAACG0569P] Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Large Tax Payer Unit, Mumbai ……………...…………Respondent ITA…

Asst CIT Cir 2(2)(1), Mumbai vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1739/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh () & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal () Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Vs Asst.Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Corporation Taxation, P.K. Kurne Circle-2(2)(1), Mumbai Chowk, Worli, Mumbai-400 018 Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Pan : Aaacm3025E Mumbai-400 020 Appellant Respondent Asst.Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vs 020Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Circle-2(2)(1), Mumbai Corporation Taxation, P.K. Kurne Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Chowk, Worli, Mumbai-400 018 Mumbai-400 Pan : Aaacm3025E Appellant Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14ASection 35Section 40Section 80I

…the purpose of determining the taxability of receipt of the said subsidy. We also find that this issue has been addressed in the following decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court in favour of the assessee as under:- (a) Chaphalkar Brothers, case reported in (2017) 88 Taxmann.com 178 (SC) (b) Shree Balaji Alloys and others, case reported in (2017) 80 Taxmann.com 239 (SC) 10.5. Respectfully following the said decision, we hold that the subsidy in the sum of Rs.45,36,95,084/- is to be treated as capital receipt. Accordingly, the concise ground No.8 raised by the assessee is allowed.” 53. Respectfully following the abov…

Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, Mumbai vs. ACIT, Cir -2(2)(1), Mumbai

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 1676/MUM/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Oct 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh () & Smt. Kavitha Rajagopal () Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Vs Asst.Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Corporation Taxation, P.K. Kurne Circle-2(2)(1), Mumbai Chowk, Worli, Mumbai-400 018 Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Pan : Aaacm3025E Mumbai-400 020 Appellant Respondent Asst.Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Vs 020Mahindra & Mahindra Limited Circle-2(2)(1), Mumbai Corporation Taxation, P.K. Kurne Aayakar Bhavan, M.K. Road Chowk, Worli, Mumbai-400 018 Mumbai-400 Pan : Aaacm3025E Appellant Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 14ASection 35Section 40Section 80I

…the purpose of determining the taxability of receipt of the said subsidy. We also find that this issue has been addressed in the following decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court in favour of the assessee as under:- (a) Chaphalkar Brothers, case reported in (2017) 88 Taxmann.com 178 (SC) (b) Shree Balaji Alloys and others, case reported in (2017) 80 Taxmann.com 239 (SC) 10.5. Respectfully following the said decision, we hold that the subsidy in the sum of Rs.45,36,95,084/- is to be treated as capital receipt. Accordingly, the concise ground No.8 raised by the assessee is allowed.” 53. Respectfully following the abov…

Joint CIT (OSD) Cent Cir. 1(4), Mumbai vs. Grasim Industries Ltd., Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed

ITA 2155/MUM/2016[1996-97]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai29 Apr 2022AY 1996-97
Section 143(3)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘G‘ BENCH MUMBAI BEFORE: SHRI M.BALAGANESH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.2156/Mum/2016 (Assessment Year :1997-98) ITA No.2154/Mum/2016 (Assessment Year :1999-00) & JCIT(OSD)-Central Circle Vs. M/s. Grasim Industries 1(4), Mumbai Limited Room No.902, 9th Floor Corporate Finance Division Old CGO Building Aditya Birla Centre A Wing, 2nd Floor M.K.Road, Churchgate SK Ahire Marg, Worli Mumbai – 400 020 Mumbai – 30 PAN/GIR No. AAACG4464B (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Revenue by Shri J.D. Mistry,Senior Advocate and Shri Ronak Doshi Assessee by Shri…

The Supreme Industries Limited, Mumbai vs. ACIT Ltu Mumbai, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 5840/MUM/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jan 2022AY 2011-12
For Appellant: Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 115JSection 14A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORESHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER& SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 5840/Mum/2019 (A.Y 2011-12) The Supreme Industries Vs. The ACIT, LTU-2 Ltd, 29th Floor, World Trade 612, Raheja Chambers, Centre No. 1, Cuffee 213, Nariman Point, Parade, Mumbai – 400 Mumbai-400 021 005. स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAACT1344F Appellant .. Respondent ITA No. 7230/Mum/2014 (A.Y 2010-11) The ACIT, LTU-2 Vs. The Supreme 29th Floor, World Trade Industries Ltd, Centre No. 1, Cuffee 612, Raheja Chambers, Parade, Mumbai – 400 213, Nariman Point,…

The Supreme Industries Ltd, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Ltu, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 7261/MUM/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jan 2022AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 115JSection 14A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORESHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER& SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 5840/Mum/2019 (A.Y 2011-12) The Supreme Industries Vs. The ACIT, LTU-2 Ltd, 29th Floor, World Trade 612, Raheja Chambers, Centre No. 1, Cuffee 213, Nariman Point, Parade, Mumbai – 400 Mumbai-400 021 005. स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAACT1344F Appellant .. Respondent ITA No. 7230/Mum/2014 (A.Y 2010-11) The ACIT, LTU-2 Vs. The Supreme 29th Floor, World Trade Industries Ltd, Centre No. 1, Cuffee 612, Raheja Chambers, Parade, Mumbai – 400 213, Nariman Point,…

DCIT, Ltu, Mumbai vs. The Supreme Industries Limited, Mumbai

In the result the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 4754/MUM/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Jan 2022AY 2009-10
For Appellant: Nitesh JoshiFor Respondent: Sanjeev Kashyap
Section 115JSection 14A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORESHRI VIKAS AWASTHY, JUDICIAL MEMBER& SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No. 5840/Mum/2019 (A.Y 2011-12) The Supreme Industries Vs. The ACIT, LTU-2 Ltd, 29th Floor, World Trade 612, Raheja Chambers, Centre No. 1, Cuffee 213, Nariman Point, Parade, Mumbai – 400 Mumbai-400 021 005. स्थायी लेखा सं./ जीआइआर सं./PAN/GIR No. : AAACT1344F Appellant .. Respondent ITA No. 7230/Mum/2014 (A.Y 2010-11) The ACIT, LTU-2 Vs. The Supreme 29th Floor, World Trade Industries Ltd, Centre No. 1, Cuffee 612, Raheja Chambers, Parade, Mumbai – 400 213, Nariman Point,…

Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax(OSD), Central Cirlce-1(4), Hyderabad vs. Medha Servo Drives Private Limited, Hyderabad

In the result, the CO filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 655/HYD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Aug 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri V. Shiva KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey, DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD (Through Virtual Hearing) BEFORE SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.654 & 655/Hyd/2018 AYs: 2013-14 and 2014-15 JCIC (OSD), VS. Medha Servo Drives Central Circle-1(4), Private Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN: AABCM 3917 A PAN: AABCM 3917 A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri V. Shiva Kumar Revenue by: Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey, DR C.O. No. 23/Hyd/2018 (A.Y.: 2014-15) (In ITA No.655/Hyd/2018) JCIC (OSD), VS. Medha Servo Drives Central Circle-1(4), Private Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. P…

Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax(OSD), Central Cirlce-1(4), Hyderabad vs. Medha Servo Drives Private Limited, Hyderabad

In the result, the CO filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 654/HYD/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Hyderabad24 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri S.S. Godara & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri V. Shiva KumarFor Respondent: Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey, DR
Section 143(3)Section 14A

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD BENCH “A”, HYDERABAD (Through Virtual Hearing) BEFORE SHRI S.S. GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI LAXMI PRASAD SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA Nos.654 & 655/Hyd/2018 AYs: 2013-14 and 2014-15 JCIC (OSD), VS. Medha Servo Drives Central Circle-1(4), Private Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. PAN: AABCM 3917 A PAN: AABCM 3917 A (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by: Shri V. Shiva Kumar Revenue by: Shri Sunil Kumar Pandey, DR C.O. No. 23/Hyd/2018 (A.Y.: 2014-15) (In ITA No.655/Hyd/2018) JCIC (OSD), VS. Medha Servo Drives Central Circle-1(4), Private Limited, Hyderabad. Hyderabad. P…

Income Tax Officer 1 (1), Indore vs. M/S Agya Auto Limited, Indore

In the result Revenue’s appeal is dismissed

ITA 540/IND/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Indore09 Feb 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Agya Auto Ltd, The Income Tax Vs. 121 A.B. Road, Vijay Nagar, Officer 1(1), Indore Scheme No.54, Indore (Revenue ) (Respondent) Pan No.Aacca6203C Revenue By Smt. Vinita Dubey, Sr.Dr Respondent By S/Shri Manoj Gupta & Pankaj Shah, Cas Date Of Hearing 04.01.2021 Date Of Pronouncement 09.02.2021 O R D E R

Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

…आयकर अपील"य अ"धकरण, इंदौर "यायपीठ, इंदौर IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, INDORE BENCH, INDORE BEFORE SHRI KUL BHARAT, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI MANISH BORAD, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Agya Auto Ltd, The Income Tax Vs. 121 A.B. Road, Vijay Nagar, Officer 1(1), Indore Scheme No.54, Indore (Revenue ) (Respondent) PAN No.AACCA6203C Revenue by Smt. Vinita Dubey, Sr.DR Respondent by S/Shri Manoj Gupta & Pankaj Shah, CAs Date of Hearing 04.01.2021 Date of Pronouncement 09.02.2021 O R D E R PER MANISH BORAD, AM. The above captioned appeal filed at the instance of revenue pertaining to Asse…

M/S. Jindal World Wide Ltd., Ahmedabad vs. The ACIT, Circle-2(1)(2), Ahmedabadq

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2316/AHD/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Ahmedabad20 Nov 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Prasad & Shri Amarjit Singh) (Through Virtual Court)

For Appellant: Shri Vartik Choksi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Lalit P. Jain, Sr. D.R
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 40

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AHMEDABAD “C” BENCH (BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (Through Virtual Court) ITA. No: 2316/AHD/2018 (Assessment Year: 2014-15) M/s Jindal World Wide V/S ACIT, Circle-2(1)(2), Ltd. Jindal Corporate Ahmedabad House, Opp. D Mart, Shyamal Shivranjini Cross Road, Satellite, Ahmedabad (Appellant) (Respondent) PAN: AAACJ3816G Appellant by : Shri Vartik Choksi, AR Respondent by : Shri Lalit P. Jain, Sr. D.R. (आदेश)/ORDER Date of hearing : 23 -10-2020 Date of Pronouncement : 24 -11-2020 PER MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEM…

Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT Cir 2(2)2, Mumbai

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes and appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1449/MUM/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai19 Jun 2020AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Shri M.Balaganesh, Am & Sa No.462/Mum/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No.1449/Mum/2016) (Assessment Year : 2011-12) Mahindra & Mahindra Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Limited, Income-Tax Corporation Taxation, Circle-2(2)(2) P.K. Kurne Chowk, Aayakar Bhavan, Worli, Mumbai – 400020 M.K.Road, Mumbai-400020 Pan/Gir No.Aaacm3025E (Appellant) .. (Respondent) & Sa No.461/Mum/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No.7382/Mum/2017) (Assessment Year : 2013-14) Mahindra & Mahindra Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Limited, Income-Tax Corporation Taxation, Circle-2(2)(2) P.K. Kurne Chowk, Aayakar Bhavan, Worli, Mumbai – 400020 M.K.Road, Mumbai-400020 Pan/Gir No.Aaacm3025E (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Dy. Commissioner Of Vs. Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, Income-Tax Corporation Taxation, Circle-2(2)(2) P.K. Kurne Chowk, Aayakar Bhavan, Worli, Mumbai – 400020 M.K.Road, Mumbai- 400020 Pan/Gir No.Aaacm3025E (Appellant) .. (Respondent) Mahindra & Mahindra Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Limited, Income-Tax Corporation Taxation, Circle-2(2)(2) P.K. Kurne Chowk, Aayakar Bhavan, Worli, Mumbai – 400020 M.K.Road, Mumbai-400020 Pan/Gir No.Aaacm3025E (Appellant) .. (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)

…the purpose of determining the taxability of receipt of the said subsidy. We also find that this issue has been addressed in the following decisions of Hon’ble Supreme Court in favour of the assessee as under:- (a) Chaphalkar Brothers, case reported in (2017) 88 Taxmann.com 178 (SC) (b) Shree Balaji Alloys and others, case reported in (2017) 80 Taxmann.com 239 (SC) 10.5. Respectfully following the said decision, we hold that the subsidy in the sum of Rs.45,36,95,084/- is to be treated as capital receipt. Accordingly, the concise ground No.8 raised by the assessee is allowed. 11. The next issue to be decided in…