ACIT v. Hukum Chand Jain

337 ITR 238High Court2011#1096 most cited

What is ACIT v. Hukum Chand Jain authority for?

Allegations of duress or coercion regarding a statement recorded under Section 132(4) are to be overruled if made after a significant lapse of time without any material evidence. Such a statement holds great evidentiary value.

101

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

ACIT v. Hukum Chand Jain · Section 132(4) statement · retracted statement · allegation of duress · allegation of coercion · evidentiary value of sworn statement · delayed retraction · lack of material evidence · statement during search · validity of statement

Also reported as

191 Taxmann 319

Sections most often in play

Section 131Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 133ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)

Issues it is cited on

section 133(a)abatement of assessmentsection 153b(1)(a)time barred assessmentsection 148(1)bona fide mistakesection 153(1)(a)statement under section 132(4)retracted statementsection 90asection 153b(1)section 153(4)

Judgments citing ACIT v. Hukum Chand Jain

Ved Prakash, Haryana vs. ACIT, Bhiwani

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is on this ground is dismissed

ITA 1411/DEL/2017[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2019AY 2003-04

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 Ita No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 Ita No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Ita No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income S/O Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, Sco 202-203, Office Of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, Huda City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Azyps0463J Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Rohtak Each Dated 30.12.2016. 2. In Ita No. 1409/Del/2017, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Effective Grounds: “1. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Has Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Without Considering That The Assessed Income After Giving Appeal Effect Of Order Of Ld. Cit(A) & Hon'Ble Itat Was Wrongly Determined On 03/03/2011 At Rs.1,58,925/- Instead Of Correct Computation At Rs.66,425/-. Even This Issue Has Not Been Considered Though Raised. 2. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts Of The Case Has Erred In Confirming The Assessment Of Income From School Without

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 ITA No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 ITA No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 ITA No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 ITA No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income S/o Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, SCO 202-203, Office of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, HUDA City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AZYPS0463J Assessee…

Ved Prakash, Haryana vs. ACIT, Bhiwani

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is on this ground is dismissed

ITA 1410/DEL/2017[2002-03]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2019AY 2002-03

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 Ita No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 Ita No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Ita No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income S/O Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, Sco 202-203, Office Of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, Huda City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Azyps0463J Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Rohtak Each Dated 30.12.2016. 2. In Ita No. 1409/Del/2017, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Effective Grounds: “1. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Has Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Without Considering That The Assessed Income After Giving Appeal Effect Of Order Of Ld. Cit(A) & Hon'Ble Itat Was Wrongly Determined On 03/03/2011 At Rs.1,58,925/- Instead Of Correct Computation At Rs.66,425/-. Even This Issue Has Not Been Considered Though Raised. 2. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts Of The Case Has Erred In Confirming The Assessment Of Income From School Without

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 ITA No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 ITA No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 ITA No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 ITA No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income S/o Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, SCO 202-203, Office of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, HUDA City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AZYPS0463J Assessee…

Ved Prakash, Haryana vs. ACIT, Bhiwani

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is on this ground is dismissed

ITA 1409/DEL/2017[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2019AY 2001-02

Bench: Sh. H. S. Sidhudr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 Ita No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 Ita No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 Ita No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 Ita No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner Of Income S/O Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, Sco 202-203, Office Of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, Huda City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Azyps0463J Assessee By : None Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.07.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 09.07.2019 Order Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar: These Are The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A), Rohtak Each Dated 30.12.2016. 2. In Ita No. 1409/Del/2017, The Assessee Has Raised The Following Effective Grounds: “1. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts & Circumstances Of The Case Has Erred In Dismissing The Appeal Without Considering That The Assessed Income After Giving Appeal Effect Of Order Of Ld. Cit(A) & Hon'Ble Itat Was Wrongly Determined On 03/03/2011 At Rs.1,58,925/- Instead Of Correct Computation At Rs.66,425/-. Even This Issue Has Not Been Considered Though Raised. 2. That The Ld. Cit(A) In The Facts Of The Case Has Erred In Confirming The Assessment Of Income From School Without

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Sh. S. S. Rana, CIT DR

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES ‘G’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. H. S. Sidhu, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member ITA No. 1409/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2001-02 ITA No. 1410/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2002-03 ITA No. 1411/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2003-04 ITA No. 1412/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2004-05 ITA No. 1413/Del/2017 : Asstt. Year : 2005-06 Ved Parkash, Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income S/o Sh. Partap Singh, Tax, SCO 202-203, Office of Paras Wali Gal, Near Bus Stand, Income Tax, HUDA City Centre, Charkhi Dadri, Haryana Bhiwani (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AZYPS0463J Assessee…

Surya Agrotech Infrastructure Ltd, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Central Circle-8, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1158/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 May 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, G.D. Agrawal, Vice G.D. Agrawal, Vice & And & Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 37Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH DELHI DELHI BENCH BENCH ’G’: NEW DELHI BENCH : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT AND AND AND , JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No 1156/Del/2019 ITA ITA No No 1156/…

Surya Agrotech Infrastructure Ltd, New Delhi vs. ACIT, Central Circle-8, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1157/DEL/2019[201`3-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 May 2019

Bench: Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, G.D. Agrawal, Vice G.D. Agrawal, Vice & And & Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 37Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH DELHI DELHI BENCH BENCH ’G’: NEW DELHI BENCH : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT AND AND AND , JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No 1156/Del/2019 ITA ITA No No 1156/…

Surya Processed Food Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs. ACIT, Central Circle-8, New Delhi

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 1156/DEL/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi07 May 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, Before Shri Before Shri G.D. Agrawal, G.D. Agrawal, Vice G.D. Agrawal, Vice & And & Ms. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamblems. Suchitra Kamble Ms. Suchitra Kamble

Section 37Section 68

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI BENCH DELHI DELHI BENCH BENCH ’G’: NEW DELHI BENCH : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, BEFORE SHRI BEFORE SHRI G.D. AGRAWAL, G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE G.D. AGRAWAL, VICE VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT PRESIDENT AND PRESIDENT AND AND AND , JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No 1156/Del/2019 ITA ITA No No 1156/…

Sajjan Kumar Agarwal, Kolkata vs. DCIT, Central Circle - 3(4), Kolkata

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1458/KOL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata15 Mar 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-(Kz) & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Section 132(1)Section 132(4)

…ge the same. He also relied on the following 15 A.Y. 2013-2014 Sajjan Kumar Agarwal judicial pronouncements in support of his contentions raised on behalf of the revenue:- (i) Rajiv Aggarwal –vs. ACIT 395 ITR 255 (Delhi); (ii) ACIT –vs.- Hukum Chand Jain [337 ITR 238]; (iii) DCIT –vs.- Ghanshyam M. Tamakluwala [217 Taxmann 37 (Gujarat)]; (iv) Kishore Kumar –vs.- CIT [234 Taxmann 771 (Supreme Court)]; (v) 214 Taxmann 221. 16. In the rejoinder, the ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that section 69A is applicable only in a case where the assessee is found to be the owner of any money, bullion, jewellery o…

Shri Sudeep Maheshwari, Bhopal vs. The ACIT -1(1), Bhopal

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is

ITA 299/IND/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Feb 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2010-11

Section 132(4)

…n record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted the addition by observing as under: “7. The A.O. has placed his reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Chattisgarh in ACIT Vs. Hukum Chand Jain & Ors. (2011) 337 ITR 238. I have carefully gone through the said decision, I find that in the said case during the course of search, cash, gold ornaments and certain loose papers were seized and assessee could not explain the recovery of cash and jewellery and in his statement under s. 132(4), he surrendered Rs.30 lakhs as his undisclosed income for the block period. I a…

The ACIT, 1(1), Bhopal vs. Shri Sudeep Maheshwari, Bhopal

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is

ITA 524/IND/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Indore13 Feb 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri Manish Boradassessment Year: 2010-11

Section 132(4)

…n record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. The Ld. CIT(A) deleted the addition by observing as under: “7. The A.O. has placed his reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Chattisgarh in ACIT Vs. Hukum Chand Jain & Ors. (2011) 337 ITR 238. I have carefully gone through the said decision, I find that in the said case during the course of search, cash, gold ornaments and certain loose papers were seized and assessee could not explain the recovery of cash and jewellery and in his statement under s. 132(4), he surrendered Rs.30 lakhs as his undisclosed income for the block period. I a…

DCIT, New Delhi vs. Sh. Rajiv Kumar Gupta, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed and the

ITA 533/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Dec 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri N.S. Sainia.Y. : 2009-10 Smt. Sushmita Gupta, Vs. Acit, Cc-2, 100, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi New Delhi – 110 003 (Pan: Aczpg1440P) (Appellant) (Respondent) A.Y. : 2009-10 Dcit, Circle-32(1), Vs. Sh. Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Room No. 323, 3Rd Floor, 100, Sunder Nagar, Ara Centre New Delhi – 110 003 Jhandewalan Extn., (Pan: Aczpg1440P) New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & ShFor Respondent: Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR)
Section 132(4)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER A.Y. : 2009-10 SMT. SUSHMITA GUPTA, Vs. ACIT, CC-2, 100, SUNDER NAGAR, NEW DELHI NEW DELHI – 110 003 (PAN: ACZPG1440P) (Appellant) (Respondent) A.Y. : 2009-10 DCIT, CIRCLE-32(1), Vs. Sh. Rajiv Kumar Gupta, ROOM NO. 323, 3RD FLOOR, 100, SUNDER NAGAR, ARA CENTRE NEW DELHI – 110 003 JHANDEWALAN EXTN., (PAN: ACZPG1440P) NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Somil Agarwal, Adv. Department by : Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR) O R D E R PER H.S.…

Smt. Sushmita Gupta, New Delhi vs. ACIT, New Delhi

In the result, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands allowed and the

ITA 15/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Dec 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhu & Shri N.S. Sainia.Y. : 2009-10 Smt. Sushmita Gupta, Vs. Acit, Cc-2, 100, Sunder Nagar, New Delhi New Delhi – 110 003 (Pan: Aczpg1440P) (Appellant) (Respondent) A.Y. : 2009-10 Dcit, Circle-32(1), Vs. Sh. Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Room No. 323, 3Rd Floor, 100, Sunder Nagar, Ara Centre New Delhi – 110 003 Jhandewalan Extn., (Pan: Aczpg1440P) New Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & ShFor Respondent: Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR)
Section 132(4)

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH “G”: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI N.S. SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER A.Y. : 2009-10 SMT. SUSHMITA GUPTA, Vs. ACIT, CC-2, 100, SUNDER NAGAR, NEW DELHI NEW DELHI – 110 003 (PAN: ACZPG1440P) (Appellant) (Respondent) A.Y. : 2009-10 DCIT, CIRCLE-32(1), Vs. Sh. Rajiv Kumar Gupta, ROOM NO. 323, 3RD FLOOR, 100, SUNDER NAGAR, ARA CENTRE NEW DELHI – 110 003 JHANDEWALAN EXTN., (PAN: ACZPG1440P) NEW DELHI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Somil Agarwal, Adv. Department by : Sh. S.S. Rana, CIT(DR) O R D E R PER H.S.…

Ajay Malshi Dedhia, Mumbai vs. JCIT 31(1), Mumbai

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 641/MUM/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai28 Aug 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri Ramit Kocharआयकर अपीऱ सं./I.T.A. No.641/Mum/2017 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2012-13)

For Appellant: Shri. Nitin M. Furia,CAFor Respondent: Shri Nishant Samaiya, DR
Section 143Section 68

…lal Jain was not produced by the assessee before the AO and a retraction made after several months does not satisfy the requirement of law . The learned CIT(A) relied upon following case laws to come to above conclusions :- a) ACIT v. Hukum Chand Jain (2011) 337 ITR 238(Chhatisgarh) b) Hiralal Maganlal & Co. v. DCIT(2005) 96 ITD 113(Mum.) c) ITO v. Devji Premji Pujara & Sons. (2013) 60 SOT 6 (Mum-trib.) Thus, the learned CIT(A) observed that the assessee was not able to prove genuineness of the loan transactions which were all accommodation entries. The assessee failed to produce these loan creditors were the…

Vaibhav Deepak Shah, Mumbai vs. Ast CIT Cen Cir 13, Mumbai

The appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4328/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jun 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & 1Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vaibhav Deepak Shah Assistant Commissioner Of 5/7, V.P. Road, Income Tax, Central Circle-13 Vs. Dadarkar House, 1St New Cgo Building, Prathistha Floor, Flat No. 9-10, Bhavan. M.K. Road Mumbai-400004. Mumbai-400020 Pan No. Bbgps2674L Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Mr. Sanjay R. Parikh, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, DR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & 1Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vaibhav Deepak Shah Assistant Commissioner of 5/7, V.P. Road, Income Tax, Central Circle-13 Vs. Dadarkar House, 1st New CGO Building, Prathistha floor, Flat No. 9-10, Bhavan. M.K. Road Mumbai-400004. Mumbai-400020 PAN No. BBGPS2674L Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 Shri…

Vaibhav Deepak Shah, Mumbai vs. Asst CIT Cen Cir 13, Mumbai

The appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4323/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & 1Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vaibhav Deepak Shah Assistant Commissioner Of 5/7, V.P. Road, Income Tax, Central Circle-13 Vs. Dadarkar House, 1St New Cgo Building, Prathistha Floor, Flat No. 9-10, Bhavan. M.K. Road Mumbai-400004. Mumbai-400020 Pan No. Bbgps2674L Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Mr. Sanjay R. Parikh, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, DR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & 1Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vaibhav Deepak Shah Assistant Commissioner of 5/7, V.P. Road, Income Tax, Central Circle-13 Vs. Dadarkar House, 1st New CGO Building, Prathistha floor, Flat No. 9-10, Bhavan. M.K. Road Mumbai-400004. Mumbai-400020 PAN No. BBGPS2674L Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 Shri…

DCIT Cen Cir 2(3), Mumbai vs. Vaibhav D Shah, Mumbai

The appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4408/MUM/2016[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jun 2018AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & 1Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vaibhav Deepak Shah Assistant Commissioner Of 5/7, V.P. Road, Income Tax, Central Circle-13 Vs. Dadarkar House, 1St New Cgo Building, Prathistha Floor, Flat No. 9-10, Bhavan. M.K. Road Mumbai-400004. Mumbai-400020 Pan No. Bbgps2674L Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Mr. Sanjay R. Parikh, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, DR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & 1Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vaibhav Deepak Shah Assistant Commissioner of 5/7, V.P. Road, Income Tax, Central Circle-13 Vs. Dadarkar House, 1st New CGO Building, Prathistha floor, Flat No. 9-10, Bhavan. M.K. Road Mumbai-400004. Mumbai-400020 PAN No. BBGPS2674L Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 Shri…

DCIT Cen Cir 2(3), Mumbai vs. Vaibhav D Shah, Mumbai

The appeals of the revenue are dismissed

ITA 4407/MUM/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai27 Jun 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri C.N. Prasad () & Shri N.K. Pradhan () Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & 1Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vaibhav Deepak Shah Assistant Commissioner Of 5/7, V.P. Road, Income Tax, Central Circle-13 Vs. Dadarkar House, 1St New Cgo Building, Prathistha Floor, Flat No. 9-10, Bhavan. M.K. Road Mumbai-400004. Mumbai-400020 Pan No. Bbgps2674L Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12

For Appellant: Mr. Sanjay R. Parikh, ARFor Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, DR
Section 131Section 133(6)Section 143(3)Section 40ASection 69C

…IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH “F” MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI C.N. PRASAD (JUDICIAL MEMBER) AND SHRI N.K. PRADHAN (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & 1Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vaibhav Deepak Shah Assistant Commissioner of 5/7, V.P. Road, Income Tax, Central Circle-13 Vs. Dadarkar House, 1st New CGO Building, Prathistha floor, Flat No. 9-10, Bhavan. M.K. Road Mumbai-400004. Mumbai-400020 PAN No. BBGPS2674L Appellant Respondent Assessment Year: 2008-09 & Assessment Year: 2009-10 & Assessment Year: 2010-11 & Assessment Year: 2011-12 Shri…

Dr. Subrata Kundu, Burdwan vs. ACIT, Cir-1, Burdwan

In the result, assessee’s appeal stands partly allowed

ITA 1815/KOL/2014[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata12 May 2017AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Waseem Ahmed & Shri S.S.Viswanethra Raviassessment Year:2010-11

Section 131Section 133ASection 144Section 145(3)Section 44A

…a qualified CA. It is settled law that assessee can retract from his statement filed at the time of survey. In holding so, we find guidance and support from the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Chattisgarh in the case of ACIT Vs. Hukum Chand Jain reported in 337 ITR 238 where it was held as under : “From the principles of law laid down in the aforesaid judgments, it may be deducted that, admission is one important piece of evidence but it cannot be said that it is conclusive. It is rebuttable. It is open to the assessee who made admission to establish that confession was involuntary and the same was extracted un…

DCIT Cen Cir 9, Mumbai vs. Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri (Delhi) P.Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 2861/MUM/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Nov 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am & Amarjit Singh, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.2250 & 2251/Mum/2013 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year: 2009-10 & 2010-11) M/S Tribhovandas Bhimji बनाम/ Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 9, Zaveri (Delhi) Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Room No.806, Ground Floor, Old C G O Annexe Bldg, Somnath Apartments, M K Road, Marine Lines, Ram Mandir Road, Mumbai-400020 Vile Parle (E), Mumbai-400057 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 69

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ “ई” म ुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, AM AND AMARJIT SINGH, JM आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.2250 and 2251/Mum/2013 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year: 2009-10 and 2010-11) M/s Tribhovandas Bhimji बनाम/ Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 9, Zaveri (Delhi) Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Room No.806, Ground Floor, Old C G O Annexe Bldg, Somnath Apartments, M K Road, Marine Lines, Ram Mandir Road, Mumbai-400020 Vile Parle (E), Mumbai-400057 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.2860 and 2861/Mum/2013…

DCIT Cen Cir 9, Mumbai vs. Tribhovandas Bhimji Zaveri (Delhi) P.Ltd, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 2860/MUM/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Nov 2015AY 2009-10

Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am & Amarjit Singh, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.2250 & 2251/Mum/2013 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year: 2009-10 & 2010-11) M/S Tribhovandas Bhimji बनाम/ Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 9, Zaveri (Delhi) Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Room No.806, Ground Floor, Old C G O Annexe Bldg, Somnath Apartments, M K Road, Marine Lines, Ram Mandir Road, Mumbai-400020 Vile Parle (E), Mumbai-400057 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 69

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ “ई” म ुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, AM AND AMARJIT SINGH, JM आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.2250 and 2251/Mum/2013 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year: 2009-10 and 2010-11) M/s Tribhovandas Bhimji बनाम/ Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 9, Zaveri (Delhi) Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Room No.806, Ground Floor, Old C G O Annexe Bldg, Somnath Apartments, M K Road, Marine Lines, Ram Mandir Road, Mumbai-400020 Vile Parle (E), Mumbai-400057 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.2860 and 2861/Mum/2013…

Tribhuvandas Bhimji Zaveri (Delhi ) P.Ltd, Mumbai vs. ACIT Cen Cir 9, Mumbai

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee for assessment year

ITA 2251/MUM/2013[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai04 Nov 2015AY 2010-11

Bench: S/Shri B.R.Baskaran, Am & Amarjit Singh, Jm आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.2250 & 2251/Mum/2013 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year: 2009-10 & 2010-11) M/S Tribhovandas Bhimji बनाम/ Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 9, Zaveri (Delhi) Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Room No.806, Ground Floor, Old C G O Annexe Bldg, Somnath Apartments, M K Road, Marine Lines, Ram Mandir Road, Mumbai-400020 Vile Parle (E), Mumbai-400057 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) ..

Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 69

…आयकर अपीऱीय अधिकरण, म ुंबई न्यायपीठ “ई” म ुंबई IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE S/SHRI B.R.BASKARAN, AM AND AMARJIT SINGH, JM आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.2250 and 2251/Mum/2013 (ननधधायण वषा / Assessment Year: 2009-10 and 2010-11) M/s Tribhovandas Bhimji बनाम/ Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 9, Zaveri (Delhi) Pvt.Ltd., Vs. Room No.806, Ground Floor, Old C G O Annexe Bldg, Somnath Apartments, M K Road, Marine Lines, Ram Mandir Road, Mumbai-400020 Vile Parle (E), Mumbai-400057 (अऩीरधथी /Appellant) (प्रत्मथी / Respondent) .. आमकय अऩीर सं./I.T.A. No.2860 and 2861/Mum/2013…