ACIT v. Hukum Chand Jain
337 ITR 238High Court2011#1096 most cited
What is ACIT v. Hukum Chand Jain authority for?
Allegations of duress or coercion regarding a statement recorded under Section 132(4) are to be overruled if made after a significant lapse of time without any material evidence. Such a statement holds great evidentiary value.
101
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,470 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.
Also referred to as
ACIT v. Hukum Chand Jain · Section 132(4) statement · retracted statement · allegation of duress · allegation of coercion · evidentiary value of sworn statement · delayed retraction · lack of material evidence · statement during search · validity of statement
Also reported as
191 Taxmann 319