Loading ITAT cases…
254 orders · Page 5 of 6
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn due to the issues being settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn by the tribunal.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement of issues under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement of issues under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement of issues under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn based on the settlement of issues under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal held that the appeal was not maintainable due to the low tax effect as per the CBDT circular. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal held that transfer pricing adjustments are contemplated only in respect of international transactions as per Section 92 of the Act, not entity-level transactions. It also directed that VRS expenses should be treated consistently for both the assessee and comparables.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal as the matter was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal remanded the issues of CENVAT adjustment and unutilized warranty provision back to the Assessing Officer for de novo consideration. The grounds related to freight expenses were dismissed as they did not arise from the impugned order.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeal. If the Vivad Se Vishwas application is disapproved, the assessee can seek restoration of the appeal.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the Tribunal.
The tribunal granted permission to the appellants to withdraw their appeals. The appeals were subsequently dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted permission to the appellants to withdraw their appeals. The appeals were accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted permission to the appellants to withdraw their appeals. The appeals were accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal noted that the CIT(Exemption) passed the rejection order shortly after the additional documents were filed and did not consider them. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(Exemption) for fresh consideration.
The Tribunal held that the generation of surplus by an educational institution does not, by itself, negate its charitable purpose, especially when the surplus is utilized for educational objectives. The Tribunal directed the CIT(Exemption) to grant registration.
The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271B was not warranted as the tax audit report was filed along with the revised returns reflecting the actual turnover.
The Tribunal held that the penalty under Section 271B was not warranted as the tax audit report was filed along with the revised returns reflecting the actual turnover.
The Tribunal held that the penalty could not be sustained as the Assessing Officer failed to identify specific inaccurate or false information provided by the assessee. The additions were based on information filed by the assessee, and there was no finding of deliberate inaccuracy.
The tribunal granted permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeals. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal found that the CIT(Exemption) might have considered wrong heads of expenditure. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the CIT(Exemption) for a fresh consideration.
The Tribunal permitted the assessee to withdraw the appeals as the issues involved were settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. The appeals were dismissed as withdrawn.
The Tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal as it had become infructuous. The revenue representative had no objection to the withdrawal.