SURESH FULCHAND BUMB,JALGAON vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE - 1, JALGAON

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1670/PUN/2017Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 March 2021AY 2010-112 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The tribunal granted the assessee's request to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2010-11. The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was whether the assessee should be permitted to withdraw the appeal due to settlement under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM

Hearing: 03.03.2021Pronounced: 03.03.2021

आदेश / ORDER

1.

The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) – 2, Nashik dated 05.04.2017 for the assessment year 2010-11.

2.

Before us, the appellant filed a letter dated 10.02.2021 seeking permission to withdraw the appeals on the ground that the issue involved in this appeal stands settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The appellant also filed copy of Form No.3 issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik – 1.

3.

On the other hand, the ld. Department Representative had expressed no objection to permit the withdrawal of appeal.

4.

In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 3rd day of March, 2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →