SATISH LAKMICHAND BOTHARA,PUNE vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, AURANGABAD

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1141/PUN/2017Status: DisposedITAT Pune03 March 2021AY 2012-132 pages
AI SummaryWithdrawn

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal granted permission to the assessee to withdraw the appeal. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(Appeals). The assessee later sought to withdraw the appeal as the issue was settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessee can withdraw the appeal if the issue is settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, PUNE

Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI S. S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JM

For Appellant: Shri Nitesh Khandelwal
Hearing: 03.03.2021Pronounced: 03.03.2021

आदेश / ORDER

1.

The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 2, Aurangabad dated 29.03.2017 for the assessment year 2012-13.

2.

Before us, the appellant filed a letter dated 03.03.2021 seeking permission to withdraw the appeal on the ground that the issue involved in this appeal stands settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2020. The appellant also filed copy of Form No.3 issued by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Nashik – 1.

3.

On the other hand, the ld. Department Representative had expressed no objection to permit the withdrawal of appeal.

4.

In the circumstances, we hereby grant permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in the open Court on 3rd day of March, 2021.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →