Loading High Court cases…
67 orders · Page 2 of 2
The High Court granted the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The High Court recorded the appellant's request to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs awarded.
The High Court granted permission to the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to the appellant to approach the court again if the dispute with the department under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act is not resolved.
The tribunal dismissed the appeal as withdrawn. Liberty was granted to approach the court again if the dispute with the department under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act is not resolved.
The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal. Liberty was granted to approach the court again if the dispute with the Department under the Vivad Se Vishwas Act is not resolved. No costs were awarded.
The High Court held that the Tribunal erred in reversing the CIT(A)'s order. The Court emphasized that the intention behind acquiring shares, maintaining separate accounts for investments, and considering various factors are crucial in determining whether gains are capital or business income.
The court granted the petitioners' request to withdraw their criminal miscellaneous petitions. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed as withdrawn.
The High Court upheld the Tribunal's assessment of future prospects but modified the compensation by deducting income tax, applying a higher multiplier, and increasing consortium claims. The rate of interest was not enhanced.
The High Court permitted the appeal to be withdrawn. The appeal was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to revive if the dispute is not resolved under the Vivad se Vishrvas Act.