1,346 orders · Page 12 of 27
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands made by the BBMP were ultravires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands made by the BBMP were unenforceable as they were ultra vires the Act. The Court stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the Assessing Officer's failure to consider the Supreme Court's decision in T.V. Sundaram Iyengar & Sons Ltd. regarding the taxability of waived loan principal made the assessment order erroneous. Consequently, the Commissioner was justified in invoking Section 263.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultravires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court disposed of the appeal with liberty to the revenue to revive it if it falls within exceptions of CBDT circulars. The questions of law were kept open for future adjudication.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.
The High Court held that the impugned demands were ultra vires the Act and therefore unenforceable. It stated that the legislature must enact appropriate laws to authorize such demands.