Loading High Court cases…
327 orders · Page 4 of 7
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the monetary limits stipulated in a CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellants' counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellant regarding the monetary limits prescribed by a circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
The High Court dismissed the appeal. This was based on a submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the monetary limits for filing appeals as per a CBDT circular.
The High Court noted the submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the appeal not being maintainable due to monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular. Based on this submission, the Court dismissed the appeal.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellants' counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on the submission made by the appellants' counsel regarding the monetary limits prescribed by a Circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on the submission made by the appellants' counsel regarding the monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellants regarding monetary limits prescribed by a circular from the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
The High Court dismissed the appeal. This was based on the submission by the Revenue's counsel that the appeal was not maintainable due to monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT Circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellants regarding monetary limits specified in a circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on the submission made by the appellants regarding the monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on the submission made by the Revenue's counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court noted the submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the appeal not being maintainable due to monetary limits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The High Court noted the submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the non-maintainability of the appeal due to monetary limits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The High Court noted the submission by the appellants' counsel that the appeal was not maintainable due to monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal.
The High Court accepted the submission regarding the monetary limits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellant's counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the Revenue's counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on the submission that the appeal fell outside the monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court noted that the appeal was not maintainable due to monetary limits prescribed by a circular. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on this ground.
The High Court accepted the submission regarding the monetary limits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.
The High Court noted the submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the appeal not being maintainable due to monetary limits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on this ground.
The High Court noted the submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the appeal not being maintainable due to monetary limits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on this ground.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellants regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellants' counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the Revenue's counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court noted the submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the appeal not being maintainable due to monetary limits as per a CBDT circular. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeal.
The High Court accepted the submission that the appeal was not maintainable due to monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellant's counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a circular.
The High Court accepted the submission regarding the non-maintainability of the appeal due to monetary limits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The High Court noted the submission by the appellants' counsel that the appeal was not maintainable due to monetary limits specified in a circular. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The High Court accepted the submission regarding the monetary limits. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the grounds of maintainability.
The High Court found that the Tribunal should not have evaluated substantial and voluminous material itself. Instead, the matter should have been remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration.
The High Court accepted the submission of the appellant's counsel regarding the non-maintainability of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the Revenue regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The appellants' counsel submitted that the appeal was not maintainable due to monetary limits specified in a circular. Based on this submission, the High Court dismissed the appeal.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellant's counsel regarding the monetary limits prescribed in a circular by the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
The High Court accepted the submission made by the Revenue's counsel. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed.
The High Court dismissed the appeal. This was based on a submission by the appellants' counsel regarding the monetary limits for filing appeals as per a CBDT circular.
The High Court accepted the submission of the appellants' counsel. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on the grounds of maintainability.
The High Court noted that the appeal was not maintainable due to the monetary limits prescribed by a circular. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on the submission by the appellant's counsel regarding the monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court noted the submission by the appellant's counsel regarding the appeal not being maintainable due to monetary limits as per a CBDT circular. Based on this submission, the Court dismissed the appeal.
The High Court held that the concurrent findings of the lower courts were not perverse and did not suffer from any illegality. The court found sufficient material to substantiate the conclusions drawn by the trial and appellate courts.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellant's counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular.
The High Court noted that the appeal was not maintainable due to monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT circular. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed on this ground.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the Revenue's counsel regarding monetary limits prescribed by a CBDT Circular.
The High Court dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. This was based on a submission by the appellants regarding monetary limits prescribed by a Circular of the Central Board of Direct Taxes.
The Tribunal erred in not considering the income tax returns for assessing the deceased's income and in not adding future prospects. The compensation amount was enhanced.