DEERE & COMPANY,PUNE vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INT;. TAXATION, CIRCLE - 1, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that an order under Section 139(9) declaring a return invalid, especially when it jeopardizes a refund, is appealable under Section 246A(1)(a) as an order where the assessee denies liability, or under Section 246A(1)(i) as akin to an order refusing refund.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a foreign company, filed its return of income, but the CPC declared it invalid due to a difference between the income reported and Form 26AS. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal against this order, holding it not appealable under Section 246A.
What were the issues?
Whether an order passed under Section 139(9) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, declaring a return invalid, is appealable before the CIT(A) under Section 246A. The dispute also involves the validity of the Section 139(9) order itself due to discrepancies between the return and Form 26AS.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 139(9),Section 246A,Section 143(1),Section 237,Section 142(1)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH, „C‟ PUNE – VIRTUAL COURT
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL & SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपील र्थी / The Appellant; 2. The Respondent 3. प्रत्यर्थी / The CIT(A), Pune-13 4. The CIT(IT/TP), Pune 5. DR, ITAT, „C‟ Bench, Pune ग र्ड फ ईल / Guard file. 6.
आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अदिकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune Date 1. Draft dictated on 02-11-2021 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 05-11-2021 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before JM the second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by JM Second Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS Sr.PS/PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *
More judgments on Section 139(9)
- P D Memorial Religious and Educational… vs DCIT (Exemption) Circle-2, ChandigarhITA 932/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- P D Memorial Religious and Educational… vs DCIT (Exemption) Circle-2, ChandigarhITA 932/CHANDI/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Pintu Babulal Purohit, Bangalore vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 5(2)(2), BangaloreITA 136/BANG/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- Ravi Rajgarhia, Kolkata vs I.T.O., Ward - 33(1), KolkataITA 1284/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed3 Sept 2026AY 2013-2014
- Harvinder Singh, Karnal vs ITO Ward 1 Karnal, KarnalITA 3219/DEL/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed13 Aug 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026