RAVI RAJGARHIA,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 33(1), KOLKATA
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH, KOLKATA
Per Rajesh Kumar, AM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 05.01.2026 for the AY 2013-14. 2. At the outset, we note that the appeal of the assessee is barred by limitation by 07 days. At the time of hearing the counsel of the assessee explained the reasons for delay in filing the appeal. The Ld. D.R did not raise any objection in condoning the delay. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the materials available on record, we find that the delay is for bonafide and genuine reasons and , hence, we condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. Ravi Rajgarhia; A.Y. 2013-14
The issue raised in ground
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.