DEEPAK KUMAR,GHAZIABAD (U.P) vs. DY. CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE GZBD U.P, UTTAR PRADESH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT Circular mandating DIN is binding on revenue authorities and its non-compliance renders the communication, i.e., the assessment order, as never issued. Therefore, the assessment order was deemed invalid.
What were the facts?
The assessee raised an additional ground of appeal regarding the assessment order not bearing a Document Identification Number (DIN). The Revenue argued that the absence of DIN was a procedural lapse and not fatal to the assessment order, especially if no prejudice was caused to the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether an assessment order passed without a mandatory Document Identification Number (DIN) is invalid and void ab initio. Whether the absence of DIN is a mere procedural irregularity or a substantive defect that vitiates the order.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(16)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- K.P. Varghese v. ITO989 citing7 Taxmann 13 · 1981 · SC
- UCO Bank v. CIT486 citing237 ITR 889 · 1999 · SC
- Navnitlal C. Javeri v. K.K. Sen230 citing1 SCR 909 · 1965
- Keshavji Ravji and Co. v. CIT209 citing82 ITR 913 · 1971 · SC
- Varghese v. ITO, Ernakulum164 citing4 SCC 173 · 1981
- Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia v. ITO140 citing149 Taxmann.com 123 · 2023 · SC · Read judgment
- UCO Bank, Calcutta v. Commissioner of Income Tax, W.B122 citing4 SCC 599 · 1999
- CIT v. Brandix Mauritius93 citing149 Taxmann.com 238 · 2023 · HC
- 4 SCC 47475 citing4 SCC 474 · 1972
- Back Office IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India73 citing2021 SCC OnLine DEL 2742 · 2021
- Ellerman Lines Ltd. v. CIT73 citing4 SCC 565 · 1979
- Texmo Precision Casting UK Ltd. v. CIT(International Taxation)34 citing138 Taxmann.com 566 · 2022 · HC
- Prakash Lal Khandelwal v. CIT26 citing151 Taxmann.com 72 · 2023 · HC
- 154 Taxmann 14423 citing154 Taxmann 144 · HC
- CIT Chennai v. Mohd. Meeran Shahul Hameed23 citing283 Taxmann 454
- Royal India Corporation Ltd. v. DCIT23 citing154 Taxmann.com 435
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : H : NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI G.S. PANNU, HON’BLE & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMA
PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM: These are appeals preferred by the Assessee as well as the Revenue. The assessee’s appeal are against the orders dated 18.08.2021 of the Commissioner
ITAs No.1507 to 1512/Del/2021 ITAs No.1493 to 1497/Del/2021 of Income Tax (Appeal), Kanpur-4 (hereinafter referred to as the Ld. First Appellate Authority or ‘Ld. FAA’ for short) in appeals No.CIT(A)- IV/KNP/10640/2019-20, No.CIT(A)-IV/K
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Jharkhand Contractors Association Thro Its President- Pramod Kumar vs. Bharat Coking Coal LTD. Thro Its Chairman Cum Managing DirectorJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Isc Processors Private Limited vs. Superintendent,Range-Iv, Burrabazar Div, CGST And Cx, Kolkata (N) Commissionerate And AnrCalcutta · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Raashi Constructions vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Commercial TaxesKarnataka · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Bidasaria Fenster Solutions vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 13 Oct 2026
- Amit Agency vs. Commissioner, CGST And CxPatna · 13 Oct 2026