INCOME TAX OFFICER vs. VIKRAM SUJITKUMAR BHATIA
What did the Supreme Court hold?
The Supreme Court held that the amendment to Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, brought by the Finance Act, 2015, is applicable to searches conducted under Section 132 even before the amendment date.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against a High Court judgment that quashed notices under Section 153C and set aside assessment orders. The High Court held that the amended Section 153C did not apply to searches conducted before the amendment date.
What were the issues?
Whether the amended Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, applies to searches conducted prior to its amendment date.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cited by 140 judgments on BharatTax
See all citing judgments →Counted from the text of the judgments hosted here. Most recent first.
- Kashyap Kaniyalal Mehta, Mumbai v. DCIT CC-4(1), MumbaiMumbai · 2026-03-27
- Kashyap Kaniyalal Mehta, Mumbai v. DCIT CC-4(1), MumbaiMumbai · 2026-03-27
- Kashyap Kaniyalal Mehta, Mumbai v. DCIT CC-4(1), MumbaiMumbai · 2026-03-27
- Kashyap Kaniyalal Mehta, Mumbai v. DCIT CC-4(1), MumbaiMumbai · 2026-03-27
- Kashyap Kaniyalal Mehta, Mumbai v. DCIT CC-4(1), MumbaiMumbai · 2026-03-27
Cases cited in this judgment(24)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Zile Singh v. State of Haryana222 citing8 SCC 1 · 2004
- (i) Sultana Begum v. Prem Chand Jain187 citing1 SCC 373 · 1997
- 167 citing
- (ii) CIT v. Hindustan Bulk Carriers131 citing3 SCC 57 · 2003
- R.S. Raghunath v. State of Karnataka128 citing1 SCC 335 · 1992
- Builders’ Association Of India v. Union Of India113 citing2 SCC 645 · 1989
- Gursahai Saigal v. CIT112 citing48 ITR 1 · 1963 · SC · Read judgment
- Pepsico India Holdings (P.) Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT95 citing2014 SCC OnLine DEL 4155 · 2014
- 48 ITR 1 (SC) Gursahai Saigal v. CIT77 citing27 ITR 20 · 1955 · SC
- Bengal Immunity Company Limited v. State of Bihar75 citing2 SCR 603 · 1955
- State of Rajasthan v. Mangilal Pindwal49 citing5 SCC 60 · 1996
- Koteswar Vittal Kamath v. K. Rangappa Baliga & Co.43 citing1 SCC 255 · 1969
- CIT v. Calcutta Knitwears, Ludhiana35 citing6 SCC 444 · 2014 · SC · Read judgment
- Whitney v. IRC, 1926 AC 37 (HL), CIT v. Mahaliram Ramjidas31 citing8 ITR 442 · 1940
- Government of Andhra Pradesh v. Hindustan Machine Tools Ltd.23 citing2 SCC 274 · 2013
- 21 citing
- Mahim Patram Private Ltd. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.11 citing3 SCC 668 · 2007
- 1 ITR 48(SC); Commissioner of Page 25 JUDGMENT 25 Wealth Tax, Meerut v. Sharvan Kumar Swarup & Sons.8 citing6 SCC 623 · 1994
- Medium Project, (2008) 17 SCC 448: (2009) 5 SCC (Civ) 9071) 14. In P. Ramachandra Rao v. State of Karnataka6 citing4 SCC 578 · 1981
- ITR 48(SC); Commissioner of Page 25 JUDGMENT 25 Wealth Tax, Meerut v. Sharvan Kumar Swarup & Sons.5 citing1 SCC 370 · 1980
- State of Tamil Nadu v. Star Tobacco Co.5 citing3 SCC 249 · 1974
- Co.: AIR 1962 SC 256; Bank of England v. Vagliano Bros 39 LR (1891) AC 107; CIT v. Anjum M.H. Ghaswala 404 citing12 SCC 607 · 2006
- 21 NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDIA LTD. AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS3 citing5 SCC 23 · 2003
- Act, (Ispat Industries Limited v. Commissioner of Customer3 citing12 SCC 583 · 2006
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURI ICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 911 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29096 OF 2019)
Income Tax Officer …Appellant(s)
Versus Vikram Sujitkumar Bhatia …Respondent(s)
With CIVIL APPEAL NO. 912 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29109 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 913 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29115 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 914 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29116 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 915 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29118 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 916 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29119 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 911 OF 2022 CIVIL APPEAL NO. 917 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29120 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 918 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29121 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 919 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29122 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 920 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29123 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 921 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29124 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 922 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29126 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 923 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29128 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 924 OF 2022 (@ SLP (C) NO. 29129 OF 2019) CIVIL APPEAL NO. 925 OF 2022 (@
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153C
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Venish Vinodray Lalani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, MorbiITA 197/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Ajay Singh, Kota vs DCIT, Central Circle, KotaITA 495/JPR/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Dineshkumar Chhaganlal Manavadaria, Junagadh vs ITO Ward 1, JunagadhITA 837/RJT/2025[2020-21]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026