VODAFONE IDEA LTD. FORMERLY IDEA CELLULAR LTD.),INDORE vs. DCIT TDS, INDORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted divergent High Court judgments on whether discounts to distributors are commission. Since the AO and CIT(A) did not examine the specific terms of the distributor agreements and the assessee's accounting treatment, the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a telecom company, provided discounts to its distributors for prepaid products. The AO held that these discounts were in the nature of commission and thus liable for TDS under Section 194H, treating the assessee as an assessee in default. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether discounts allowed to distributors for prepaid products are in the nature of commission attracting TDS under Section 194H, and whether the AO and CIT(A) properly considered the evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(7)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Idea Cellular Ltd.155 citing189 Taxmann.com 118 · 2010 · HC
- State Lotteries & Ors. (2001) 249 ITR 186 and Ahmedabad Stamp Vendors Association v. Union of India121 citing257 ITR 202 · 2002 · HC
- Hindustan Coca Cola v. CIT73 citing402 ITR 539 · 2018 · HC
- Bharati Airtel Ltd. v. DCIT71 citing52 Taxmann.com 31 · 2014 · HC
- Vodafone Essar Cellular v. ACIT44 citing194 Taxmann 518 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- Bharati Cellular Ltd. v. ACIT24 citing12 Taxmann.com 30 · 2011 · HC
- ACIT v. Bharati Cellular Ltd.21 citing105 ITD 129 · 2007 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per Bench:
These 19 appeal
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 194H
- Mahesh Pulaveni, Adilabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 991/HYD/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
- Shobha Sudamrao Tagad, Ahmednagar vs ITO WD-1, AhmednagarITA 311/PUN/2026[2023-24]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2023-24
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026