Vodafone Essar Cellular v. ACIT

194 Taxmann 518High Court2010#2668 most cited

What is Vodafone Essar Cellular v. ACIT authority for?

Discount paid to distributors on prepaid cards constitutes 'commission' for the purpose of TDS under Section 194H. Consequently, failure to deduct TDS makes the assessee liable under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A).

44

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2016 to 2023.

Also referred to as

Vodafone Essar Cellular v. ACIT · 194 Taxmann 518 · Section 194H · Section 201(1) · Section 201(1A) · TDS on commission · discount on prepaid cards · assessee in default · Kerala High Court

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing Vodafone Essar Cellular v. ACIT

Vodafone Essar Cellular v. ACIT (194 Taxmann 518) — Cited in 44 Judgments | BharatTax