M/S. PANASONIC ENERGY INDIA CO.LTD,VADODARA vs. THE PR. CIT-2, BARODA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner was not justified in invoking Section 263 powers based on the premise that commission paid to a non-resident for services rendered outside India is taxable in India. The Tribunal found this premise to be legally unsustainable.
What were the facts?
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax invoked Section 263 powers to revise an assessment, holding that commission paid to a non-resident for services rendered outside India was taxable in India. The assessee argued that the assessment was completed with proper inquiry and the commission was not taxable.
What were the issues?
Whether the Principal Commissioner erred in invoking Section 263 powers when the commission paid to a non-resident for services rendered outside India was not taxable in India.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 40(a)(i),Section 195,Section 9(1)(i),Section 9(1)(vii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(15)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- GE India Technology Centre Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT663 citing7 Taxmann.com 18 · 2010 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Faizan Shoes (P.) Ltd.139 citing226 Taxmann 115 · 2014
- DIT v. Sheraton International Inc.105 citing313 ITR 267 · 2009 · HC
- 284 ITR 56474 citing284 ITR 564 · 2006 · HC
- DCIT v. Welspun Corporation Ltd.69 citing55 ITR (Trib) 405 · 2017 · ITAT
- 343 ITR 38550 citing343 ITR 385 · 2012 · HC
- CIT v. Farida Leather Co.44 citing66 Taxmann.com 321 · 2016 · HC
- CIT v. Kikani Exports (P.) Ltd.43 citing232 Taxmann 255 · 2014 · HC
- Armyesh Global v. Asstt. CIT40 citing21 Taxmann.com 130 · 2012 · ITAT
- 18 Taxmann.com 32538 citing18 Taxmann.com 325 · 2012
- UPS SCS Asia Ltd. v. Asstt. DIT, (International Taxation)37 citing50 SOT 268 · 2012 · ITAT
- 206 Taxmann 1933 citing206 Taxmann 19
- 155 Taxmann 10132 citing155 Taxmann 101 · HC
- AravindaParamila Works v. CIT24 citing237 ITR 284 · 1999 · SC
- Dampskibsselskabet AF 1912 v. Addl. DIT (International Taxation)20 citing51 DTR 148 · 2011
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AHMEDABAD “D” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Per Pramod Kumar, AM:
By way of this appeal, the assessee-appellant has challenged the correctness of the order dated 30.03.2015 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income-tax, Vadodara-2, Vadodara under Section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for the Assessment Year 2009-10. 2. The grievances raised by the assessee are as follows:- “1. The learned Principal Commissioner of the Income Tax-2, Vadodara ("the CIT”) erred in fact and in law in revising the assessment by invoking powers u/s. 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") which was completed
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Prabhudatta Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods And Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs. Joint Commissioner Of GST (Appeal), Territorial Range, BolangirOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Attitude Exim PVT. LTD., Rourkela vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Pradeep Kumar Mahapatra, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent Bhubaneswar-Iii Circle, CGST Range, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026