GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE PRIVATE LTD. vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

CIVIL APPEAL No. 7541/2010Supreme Court[2010] 10 S.C.R. 114209 September 2010Bench: 2 JudgesAuthor: S.H. KAPADIA, K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN B18 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What were the facts?

The assessee, GE India Technology Centre Private Ltd., failed to deduct tax at source (TAS) on payments made to a non-resident software supplier for imported software. The Assessing Officer (TDS) and the Commissioner (Appeals) held that the payment constituted royalty and was taxable in India, thus attracting the obligation to deduct TAS under Section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) disagreed, finding that the payment was not royalty and not taxable in India, and therefore, no TAS liability arose. The High Court, however, held that the mere act of remittance triggered the obligation to deduct TAS, without examining the merits of whether the payment was chargeable to tax in India. The matter reached the Supreme Court.

What did the Supreme Court hold?

The Supreme Court held that the High Court's interpretation that the obligation to deduct TAS arises merely upon remittance was incorrect. The Court emphasized that Section 195(1) clearly states that tax is deductible only from sums "chargeable under the provisions of the Act." This means the payment must be taxable in India, either wholly or in part. The Court clarified that Section 195(1) contemplates composite payments as well, but the obligation to deduct TAS is limited to the appropriate proportion of income chargeable under the Act. The Court distinguished the present case from the Transmission Corporation of A.P. Ltd. case, explaining that Section 195(2) is for situations where the payer doubts the proportion of income in a composite payment, not for cases where the entire payment is not chargeable to tax. Since the High Court did not decide on the merits of whether the payment constituted royalty and was taxable in India, the Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order and remitted the matter back for de novo consideration on the specific question of whether the payment was royalty and taxable in India, thus relieving the assessee of the obligation to deduct TAS if it was not chargeable.

What were the issues?

1. Whether the obligation to deduct tax at source under Section 195(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arises merely upon remittance of a sum to a non-resident, or only if such sum is chargeable to tax in India? Assessee's Contention: The assessee argued that the obligation to deduct TAS under Section 195(1) is contingent upon the payment being "chargeable under the provisions of the Act." Therefore, if the sum paid is not taxable in India, no TAS is required. They relied on the ITAT's finding that the payment was not royalty and not taxable in India. Revenue's Contention: The Revenue contended that the moment there is a remittance to a non-resident, an obligation to deduct TAS arises. The High Court's view supported this, stating that the obligation arises upon remittance. The Revenue likely implicitly argued that the payment was indeed royalty and thus chargeable to tax in India, though the judgment focuses on the High Court's interpretation of Section 195(1).

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 195(1),Section 195(2),Section 4,Section 5,Section 9,Section 40(a)(i),Section 194C,Section 194EE,Section 194F

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

A B c [2010] 10 S.C.R. 1142 GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE PRIVATE LTD. V. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. (Civil Appeal Nos. 7541-7542 of 2010) SEPTEMBER 09, 2010 [S.H. KAPADIA, CJI AND K.

5.

PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN, J.] Income Tax Act, 1961: s.195(1) - Payment to Non-resident - Liability to deduct tax at source - Held: The payer is bound to deduct tax at source (TAS) only if the tax is assessable in India - Expression "chargeable under the provisions of the Act" in 0 s.195(1) shows that the remittance has got to be of a trading receipt, the whole or part of which is liable to tax in India - On facts, software imported by Indian Company- Payment made to non-resident software supplier - Failure on part of Indian Company to deduct tax at source - Tribunal's view that the E sum paid to non-resident supplier was not royalty and the same did not give rise to any income taxable in India and, therefore, liability to deduct TAS did not arise - High Court held that the moment there is remittance, an obligation to deduct TAS arises - The view of High Court was not correct in the light of expression "chargeable under the provisions of F the Act" in s.195(1) - Since High

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

Create a free accountSign in

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 195(1)

All 52 judgments and leading authorities on Section 195(1) →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →