DIT v. Sheraton International Inc.

313 ITR 267High Court2009#1038 most cited

What is DIT v. Sheraton International Inc. authority for?

Payments received by a non-resident for advertising, publicity, and sales promotion services, where the use of trademarks and trade names is incidental, do not qualify as 'royalty' or 'fees for technical services' under Section 9(1)(vii) of the Income Tax Act or the India-USA DTAA.

105

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2015 to 2025.

Also referred to as

DIT v. Sheraton International Inc. · 313 ITR 267 · Section 9(1)(vii) · fees for technical services · FTS · royalty income · India-USA DTAA · advertising and sales promotion · incidental trademark use · non-resident taxation · hotel services

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing DIT v. Sheraton International Inc.

Showing 120 of 105 · Page 1 of 6