T AND T INFRA LIMITED,PUNE vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-7, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the Assessing Officer had not properly examined the terms and conditions of each project. Therefore, the issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee company claimed deduction under Section 80IA(4) for infrastructure projects. The Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction, considering the assessee to be a works contractor rather than a developer.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee qualifies as a developer of infrastructure facilities eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4) or merely a works contractor.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(12)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Alom Extrusions Ltd.1,344 citing319 ITR 306 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- Allied Motors (P) Ltd. v. CIT398 citing224 ITR 677 · 1997 · SC · Read judgment
- Bajaj Tempo Ltd. v. CIT289 citing196 ITR 188 · 1992 · SC
- CIT v. ABG Heavy Industries Ltd.229 citing322 ITR 323 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- CWT v. Officer-in-Charge (Court of Wards), Paigha93 citing105 ITR 133 · 1976 · SC
- Asstt. CIT v. Pratibha Industries Ltd.64 citing28 Taxmann.com 246 · 2013
- B.T. Patel & Sons Belgaum Constructions (P) Ltd. v. CIT52 citing34 Taxmann.com 97 · 2013 · ITAT
- 296 (Mumbai-Trib). PNC Construction Co Ltd. v. DCIT28 citing92 Taxmann.com 106 · 2018
- State of Andhra Pradesh v. Kone Elevators India Ltd.16 citing3 SCC 389 · 2005
- CIT v. Ranjit Projects Private Limited10 citing94 Taxmann.com 320 · 2018 · HC
- Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. v. State of Orissa8 citing55 STC 327 · 1989 · SC
- Mukharji, C.J. in Charan Lal Sahu v. Union of India5 citing1 SCC 613 · 1989 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R. K. PANDA & MS ASTHA CHANDRA
आदेश की प्रतितिति अग्रेतिि/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant; प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent 2.
More judgments on Section 80IA(4)
- Bombay Highway Carriers Private Limited… vs ITO Ward 5 (1), DelhiITA 6863/DEL/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed22 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central… vs Megha Engineering Infrastructures Limited…ITA 6273/DEL/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Cicago Commodities Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata vs ACIT, Circle 1(1), KolkataITA 994/KOL/2025[2018-2019]Status: Heard1 Sept 2026AY 2018-2019
- Gl Constructions Private Limited, Mumbai vs Circle 1(3)(1), MumbaiITA 2429/MUM/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Jul 2026AY 2024-25
- Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax vs M/S. Gharpure Engineering & Construction P…ITA 1042/PUN/2014[2009-10]Status: Disposed18 Jun 2026AY 2009-10
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026