State of Andhra Pradesh v. Kone Elevators India Ltd.

181 ELT 156Supreme Court of India2005#7165 most cited

What is State of Andhra Pradesh v. Kone Elevators India Ltd. authority for?

The substance of a contract is determinative, not its form, and the essence of the contract should be ascertained by considering the intention of the parties.

16

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,339 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Also referred to as

State of Andhra Pradesh v. Kone Elevators India Ltd. · substance over form · intention of parties · essence of contract · piercing the veil

Judgments citing State of Andhra Pradesh v. Kone Elevators India Ltd.

Viswamanava Samaikyata Samsat, Guntur vs. Income Tax Officer(Exemptions), Guntur

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 278/VIZ/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 May 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 278/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2014-15) M/S. Viswamanava Samikyata Vs. Income Tax Officer Samsat, Guntur. (Exemptions), Pan: Aaatv 1597 P Guntur. (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधर्थीकीओरसे/ Assessee By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate प्रत्यधर्थीकीओरसे/ Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr सुिवधईकीतधरीख/ Date Of Hearing : 02/04/2024 घोर्णधकीतधरीख/Date Of : 28/05/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 11(1)(d)Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 148

…ds as under: “The appellant submitted that the substance needs to be looked into and would form the basis for conclusion about the nature of DONATIONS. The appellant placed reliance on in the case of State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Kone Elevators India Ltd (2005) 181 ELT 156 (Supreme Court), Sundaram Finance Ltd vs. State of Kerala AIR 1966 SC 1178 the Supreme Court, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd vs. Union of India reported in 2006-TMI-309 (Supreme Court) wherein it was held “where the Apex Court held that the substance of the contract is determinative and not its form. Thus, the essence of the contract is crucial and to…