M/S. BHUMI NIRMAN PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 10(4), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee had disclosed transactions and proved the genuineness of losses. The additions related to property sale profit and losses were directed to be deleted, and the benefit of indexation was to be allowed. The Section 14A disallowance was also deleted as no exempt income was earned.
What were the facts?
The assessee declared a certain income, but the Assessing Officer (AO) added a significant amount for alleged undisclosed profit from property sale and also made a disallowance under Section 14A. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether the AO correctly treated the sale of property as undisclosed profit and disallowed expenses under Section 14A without exempt income.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(9)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Cheminvest Ltd. v. CIT1,569 citing234 Taxmann 761 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Corrtech Energy (P.) Ltd.579 citing45 Taxmann.com 116 · 2014 · HC
- Redington (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT370 citing77 Taxmann.com 257 · 2017 · HC
- PCIT v. Era Infrastructure (India) Ltd.354 citing448 ITR 674 · 2022 · HC
- PCIT v. IL&FS Energy Development Company Ltd.255 citing84 Taxmann.com 186 · 2017 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Shivam Motors (P.) Ltd.179 citing55 Taxmann.com 262 · 2015 · HC
- CIT v. Lakhani Marketing Inc.145 citing226 Taxmann 48 · 2014 · HC
- Trib.), (ii) PCIT v. Vardhman Chemtech (P.) Ltd.11 citing423 ITR 241 · 2020 · HC
- Eveready Industries India Ltd. v. PCIT9 citing114 Taxmann.com 610 · 2020
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: SRI SANJAY GARG & SRI SANJAY AWASTHI
Per Sanjay Awasthi, Accountant Member:
In this case there is a delay of 298 days in filing of this appeal, for which the appellant has filed a petition for condonation of such delay as under: “The appellant do hereby most respectfully submits before your honours that in the present case, the appellate order is dated 29.05.2023. Accordingly the last date to file the appeal was 28.07.2023. As such there appears a delay of 293 days in filing the appeal. From the e-filing portal it appe
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026