ACIT (CENTRAL)-1, BHOPAL, BHOPAL vs. SOM DISTILLERIES AND BREWERIES LTD., BHOPAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of ad-hoc disallowances made by the AO on travelling and conveyance expenses, following its own earlier decision. For the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) due to a discrepancy in royalty payments, the ITAT remanded the issue to the AO for fresh adjudication after conducting necessary inquiries.
What were the facts?
The assessee company, engaged in the manufacture of beer and liquor, filed returns for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15. The Assessing Officer (AO) made additions for disallowance of expenses under Section 14A and Section 40(a)(ia). The Commissioner (Appeals) deleted some additions but upheld others. Both the assessee and revenue filed appeals before the ITAT.
What were the issues?
Whether ad-hoc disallowances of expenses are sustainable without proper investigation, and whether a disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) is justified based solely on a discrepancy in figures without inquiry from the payee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(11)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Hero Cycles Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT361 citing63 Taxmann.com 308 · 2015 · SC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Jansampark Advertising & Marketing (P.) Ltd.196 citing56 Taxmann.com 286 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Anil Kumar & Co.121 citing386 ITR 702 · 2016 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. Paradise Holidays104 citing325 ITR 13 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- PCIT v. R.G. Buildwell Engineers Ltd.71 citing99 Taxmann.com 284 · 2018 · SC
- Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-1 v. Ercon Composites32 citing49 Taxmann.com 489 · 2014 · ITAT
- CIT v. Pure Pharma (P) Ltd.13 citing277 ITR 273 · 2005 · HC
- Dhakeshwari Cotton\nMills Ltd. v. CIT10 citing26 ITR 776 · SC
- CIT v. Himalaya Drug Co. (P) Ltd.7 citing234 ITR 167 · 1998 · HC
- V.B. Gadkari v. STO5 citing59 STC 362 · 1985
- (ii) CIT v. Tractor & Farm Equipments4 citing133 ITR 147 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
Per Bench:
The captioned two appeals filed by parties are as per following details:
Som Distilleries and Breweries Limited, Bhopal ITA Nos. 271/Ind/2023 (A.Y. 2013-14) & ITA No. 297/Ind/2023 (A.Y. 2014-15)
(a) ITA No. 271/Ind/2023 is an appeal by assessee against appeal-order
dated 05.06.2023 passed by Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeal)-3,
Bhopal [“CIT(A)”] which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated
2016 passed by
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Dc Security Services vs. Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shreekanth Enterprises vs. Joint Commissioner AppealsUttarakhand · 14 Oct 2026
- Sharad Ashok Agarwal vs. State Of Maharashtra Through G.P. And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026