CIT v. Pure Pharma (P) Ltd.

270 ITR 382High Court2005#8667 most cited
13

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 292,668 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2024.

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. Pure Pharma (P) Ltd.

DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI vs. M/S. GANGES INTERNATIONALE PVT. LTD.,, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3370/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 3370/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2016-17 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Ganges International Pvt. Ltd., Income Tax, Corporate Circle 2(1), Vs. B-36, Lawrence Road, Room No. 511, 5Th Floor, Wanaparthy Industrial Area, Block, No. 121, M.G. Road, New Delhi 110 035. Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Aaacg4177F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G. Johnson, Addl. Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ved Jain, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 16.03.2021 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 09.04.2021 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 6, Chennai Dated 25.09.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2016-17. The Effective Ground Raised By The Revenue Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Deleting The Addition On Account Of Disallowance Of Commission Paid To M/S. Amikong Pte Ltd. For ₹.2,66,91,976/- & M/S. Poushali Sales Pvt. Ltd. For ₹.69,74,865/-.

For Appellant: Shri G. Johnson, Addl. CITFor Respondent: Shri Ved Jain, C.A
Section 143(3)Section 154Section 37

…v. Shree Sajjan Mills Ltd. 302 ITR (Indore)(2008)115 TTJ 145 Business Expenditure-Commission-Agreements and details of Sales Furnished-No Findings that service were not rendered- Commission deductible-Income Tax Act 1961 s.37 CIT V. Pure Pharma Pvt Ltd. (2004)270 ITR 382(MP) Business Expenditure -Appeal to High Court-Substantial question of law-Commission-Findings that amounts had been paid for business purposes-Tribunal justified in allowing deduction -No. substantial question of law-Income Tax Act, 1961, s.37) 260A. CIT V. Electric Construction Equipment Co. Ltd. ( 1990) 82 ITR 510 Reference -Business Expenditu…