IDFC LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CO. CIRCLE - II (3),, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal allowed the assessee's claim for mark-to-market losses on current investments, reversing the orders of the AO and CIT(A). The assessee's appeal was partly allowed, while the Revenue's appeal and the assessee's rectification appeal were dismissed.
What were the facts?
The assessee claimed deductions and exemptions, including for dividend income and interest on debentures. The Assessing Officer (AO) made disallowances under Section 14A and other sections, which were partly modified by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the disallowance of expenses under Section 14A, eligibility for deductions on interest on debentures and provisions for bad debts, and the allowability of mark-to-market losses on investments.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 36(1)(vii),Section 36(1)(viia),Section 43B,Section 234D
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(8)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Woodward Governor India Pvt. Ltd.968 citing179 Taxmann 326 · 2009 · SC · Read judgment
- Redington (India) Ltd. v. Addl. CIT370 citing392 ITR 633 · 2017 · HC
- United Commercial Bank v. CIT314 citing240 ITR 355 · 1999 · SC
- CIT v. Bank of Baroda51 citing262 ITR 334 · 2003 · HC
- Tourism Finance Corporation of India Ltd. v. JCIT12 citing2 ITR 1 · 2010
- Dy CIT v. Gujarat Road and Infrastructure Co. Ltd.3 citing31 Taxmann.com 137 · 2013
- Gujarat Toll Road Investment Co. Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT3 citing125 ITD 159 · ITAT
- Lakshmi Villas Bank Ltd. v. CIT3 citing154 Taxmann 301
Heard together (2 matters)
Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘डी’ "ायपीठ, चे"ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI "ी एबी टी. वक", "ाियक सद" एवं "ी जगदीश, लेखा सद" के सम$ BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.877/Chny/2018 & 677/Chny/2020 िनधा&रण वष& /Assessment Years: 2010-11 Company Circle-II(3), Limited), Chennai. KRM Tower, 8th Floor, No.1, Harrington Road, Chetpet, Chennai – 600 031. PAN: AAACI 2663N (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No.878/Chny/2018 िनधा&रण वष& /Assessment Year: 2010-11 The Dy. Commissioner of Income IDFC Limited, Tax, (erstwhile known as Infrastructure Corporate Circle-2(2), Chetpet, Chennai – 600 031. PAN: AAACI 2663N अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Assessee by : Shri Farookh V. Irani, Advocate +,थ" की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 23.07.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 30.09.2024
ITA No.877, 878/Chny/2018 & 677/Chny/2020 :- 2 -:
आदेश /
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026