YUWAM EDUCATION PVT. LTD.,JAIPUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR, JAIPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that both parties agreed that the issues required verification by the AO. The assessee also claimed a lack of proper opportunity to be heard regarding expenditure disallowances. Therefore, the matter was restored to the AO for fresh inquiry.
What were the facts?
During a survey, the assessee surrendered undisclosed income of Rs. 46,68,283/-. The Assessing Officer (AO) proposed to tax this amount under Section 115BBE and also made an addition for suppressed profits based on a discrepancy between net profit at the time of survey and declared profit. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's order.
What were the issues?
Whether the surrendered income is taxable under Section 115BBE and whether the addition for suppressed profits is justified, requiring further verification.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(29)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Kale Khan Mohammad Hanif v. CIT581 citing50 ITR 1 · 1963 · SC
- Roshan Di Hatti v. CIT477 citing107 ITR 938 · 1977 · SC · Read judgment
- Govindarajulu Mudaliar v. CIT306 citing34 ITR 807 · 1958 · SC
- CIT v. Devi Prasad Vishwanath Prasad272 citing72 ITR 194 · 1969 · SC
- CIT v. Hotel Meriya139 citing332 ITR 537 · 2011 · HC
- Fakir Mohmed Haji Hasan v. CIT136 citing247 ITR 290 · 2001 · HC · Read judgment
- CIT v. O. Abdul Razzak121 citing20 Taxmann.com 48 · 2012 · HC
- CIT v. M.Ganapathi Mudaliar110 citing53 ITR 623 · 1964 · SC
- NavdeepDingra v. CIT94 citing56 Taxmann.com 67 · 2015 · HC
- Raj Hans Towers (P.) Ltd. v. CIT (86 citing230 Taxmann 567 · 2015 · HC · Read judgment
- Bachittar Singh v. CIT66 citing328 ITR 400 · 2010 · HC · Read judgment
- Commissioner of Income-tax v. MAC Public Charitable Trust55 citing144 Taxmann.com 54 · 2022 · HC
- CIT v. Bajargan Traders45 citing86 Taxmann.com 295 · 2017 · HC
- 43 (AP & Tel), Commissioner of Income-tax v. Lekh Raj Dhunna39 citing20 Taxmann.com 554 · 2012 · HC
- M/s. SVS Oils Mills v. ACIT39 citing113 Taxmann.com 388 · 2020 · HC
- CIT v. Lekh Raj Dhunna38 citing344 ITR 352 · 2012 · HC
- Param Anand Builders (P.) Ltd. v. ITO36 citing59 ITD 29 · 1996 · ITAT
- Navin Shantilal Mehta v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-32 (2) (4), Mumbai35 citing90 Taxmann.com 16 · 2018 · ITAT
- Manoharlal Kasturchand Chokshi v. ACIT30 citing61 ITD 55 · 1997 · ITAT
- Dr. S.C. Gupta v. CIT27 citing118 Taxmann 252 · 2001 · HC
- Mohmed Haji Hasan v. Commissioner of Income-tax26 citing165 CTR 111 · 2001 · HC
- CIT (2013) 355 ITR 255 157-176 16 177-191 17 Pankaj Mani Kulshreshtha v. ITO (ITAT Jaipur) (B) Case17 citing141 Taxmann.com 477 · 2022 · SC
- Suraj Bhan Oil (P.) Ltd. v. DCIT16 citing446 ITR 539 · 2022 · HC
- 236 CTR 41410 citing236 CTR 414 · 2010
- 48 Kiran Fine Jewellers Pvt. Ltd. v. DCIT Hon'ble Supreme Court10 citing288 Taxmann 635 · 2022 · SC
- Smt. Rekha Shekhawat v. PCIT8 citing218 DTR 161 · 2022 · ITAT
- Principal Commissioner of Income-tax v. Deccan Tobacco Company7 citing286 Taxmann 558 · 2022 · SC
- SVS Oil Mills v. ACIT, Non Corporate Circle-6(1), Chennai6 citing269 Taxmann 508 · 2020 · HC
- DCIT v. Adarsh Industrial Estate\nPvt. Ltd.5 citing190 ITD 878 · 2021 · ITAT
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES,”A” JAIPUR
Before: SHRI RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM & SHRI NARINDER KUMAR, JM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No.1029/JP/2024
PER: RATHOD KAMLESH JAYANTBHAI, AM
By way of the present appeal the assessee challenges the findings of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Jaipur - 4 [ for short CIT(A) ]recorded in order dated 07/06/2024 for assessment year 2016-17. That order of ld. CIT(A) has arisen because the assessee challenged assessment order dated 28.12.2018 passed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, [ for short Ac
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 115BBE
- Vishal Kumar Patel(HUF), Raipur vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), RaipurITA 595/RPR/2026[2017-18]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 875/RJT/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Neepaben Sunnybhai Motwani, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, RajkotITA 874/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026