CIT v. O. Abdul Razzak

20 Taxmann.com 48High Court2012#860 most cited

What is CIT v. O. Abdul Razzak authority for?

An assessee's retraction of a statement is an afterthought if the Assessing Officer demonstrates the original statement was correct and the retraction is unsupported by evidence.

121

judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.

Also referred to as

CIT v. O. Abdul Razzak · 20 taxmann.com 48 · retraction of statement · Assessing Officer · material evidence · afterthought · section 132(4) · section 143(3) · section 153C · section 37(1)

Issues it is cited on

Judgments citing CIT v. O. Abdul Razzak

CIT v. O. Abdul Razzak (20 Taxmann.com 48) — Cited in 121 Judgments | BharatTax