CIT v. O. Abdul Razzak
20 Taxmann.com 48High Court2012#860 most cited
What is CIT v. O. Abdul Razzak authority for?
An assessee's retraction of a statement is an afterthought if the Assessing Officer demonstrates the original statement was correct and the retraction is unsupported by evidence.
121
judgments rely on this decision, according to BharatTax’s citation analysis of 366,314 Indian tax judgments — from 2017 to 2026.
Also referred to as
CIT v. O. Abdul Razzak · 20 taxmann.com 48 · retraction of statement · Assessing Officer · material evidence · afterthought · section 132(4) · section 143(3) · section 153C · section 37(1)